1 / 18

Review of Abnormal MCPEs

Review of Abnormal MCPEs. April 19 th through April 27 th , 2004 May 12 th , 2004 Market Operations Support Brandon Whittle. April 19 th , 2004. MCPEs NH Shadow Prices. April 19 th , 2004. No Limit Changes on NH CSC

amora
Download Presentation

Review of Abnormal MCPEs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Review of Abnormal MCPEs April 19th through April 27th, 2004 May 12th, 2004 Market Operations Support Brandon Whittle

  2. April 19th, 2004 • MCPEs • NH Shadow Prices

  3. April 19th, 2004 • No Limit Changes on NH CSC • Operator Actions consistent with procedures, no evidence of over or under constraint • Flow controlled to 85-90% of posted limit – Why? • Blue – NH Limit • Red – NH Flow

  4. April 19th, 2004 • Why were flows managed fairly conservatively? • TDSP notified ERCOT of need for lower limit due to post-contingency voltage instability • ERCOT currently does not have tools to perform real-time voltage stability testing. (Release 3) • ERCOT Operations chose to be conservative and controlled to a lower than posted limit • New procedures being discussed to change posted limit

  5. April 19th, 2004

  6. April 19th, 2004 • Contributing Factor – Load Change • 200 MW load forecast increase in ERCOT between 15:45 and 16:00 • 229 MW load forecast increase in load in Houston Zone • This causes the predicted flow across the N-H CSC to be significantly higher, requiring more BES to be cleared, thus higher prices • CSC flowcsc=

  7. April 19th, 2004

  8. April 22nd, 2004 • MCPEs • NH, SH Shadow Prices

  9. April 22nd, 2004 • Interval 14:15 West MCPE -999.01 • Extremely high Shadow Prices and MCPEs were mitigated after market clearing. Prices shown are mitigated prices which are marginal bids cleared. • All available BES is used to solve a zonal constraint if necessary, using power balance as a limit. • Due to exhaustion of available bid stacks and West Zone BES bid of -999.01

  10. April 22nd, 2004 April 22nd, 2004 • Blue – NH Limit • Red – NH Flow

  11. April 22nd, 2004 • Significant Limit change on N-H for 0700 • Related to planned outage of King to Kuykendall • NH and SH constraints active, in both cases Houston UBES is necessary to solve • N-H curtailment contributes to loading on SH constraint • Operator actions • No evidence of over constraint • Operator could have mitigated by easing into the limit change although not supported in procedures

  12. April 22nd, 2004 • New Development in Procedures • ERCOT recognized problem and proposed internal solution • Solution in Transmission and Security Desk Procedures 2.2.1 step 2.2 • Operator is to gradually reduce flows across a CSC in preparation for a limit change

  13. April 26th, 2004 • MCPEs • 1645 Interval high, no congestion

  14. April 26th, 2004 • 1606 Generation Trip • Low Frequency • Increase in Balancing Energy necessary to replace RRS deployment • Blue – ERCOT Frequency • Red – Balancing deployed

  15. April 27th, 2004 • MCPEs • Shadow Prices Northeast to North

  16. April 27th, 2004 • Blue – EN Limit • Red – EN Flow

  17. April 27th, 2004 • Operator Actions were good, let off constraint as flow decreased • Limits were lowered on NE-N due to a combination of several outages • Increase in Balancing required to meet load contributed to rise in MCPEs

  18. Recommendations • Ease into planned CSC limit changes • Requires procedure change – DONE • Post limits CSC limits in Real Time • In discussion, enhancements to made progressively • Enhance BES market to limit use of zones with negligible affect on constraint solution • Currently planned for Release 5 • Requires Protocol changes • Solutions currently being studied • Shadow Price Cap? • Virtual Bids? • Penalty Weight Change?

More Related