1 / 26

Experimental Investigation of Impeller-Diffuser Interaction

Experimental Investigation of Impeller-Diffuser Interaction. Rita Patel, Eric Savory and Robert Martinuzzi. Outline. Background Motivation Current Work Design of experimental rig CFD analysis Results and discussion Conclusions Future Work. Terminology. Cumpsty (1978). Impellers

amyray
Download Presentation

Experimental Investigation of Impeller-Diffuser Interaction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experimental Investigation of Impeller-Diffuser Interaction Rita Patel, Eric Savory and Robert Martinuzzi

  2. Outline • Background • Motivation • Current Work • Design of experimental rig • CFD analysis • Results and discussion • Conclusions • Future Work

  3. Terminology Cumpsty (1978)

  4. Impellers Radially ending Backswept Pre-swirl Above w/splitter blades Diffusers Vaneless Vaned Radial Wedge Discrete-passage Types of Impellers and Diffusers Pictures courtesy of Compressor Branch NASA Glenn Research Center

  5. Radial Impeller Discharge • Increasing BL on shroud-suction side due to curvature • Separation • Wake on shroud-suction side • Jet displaced to hub-pressure side Jet Wake PS SS Dean and Senoo (1960), Eckardt (1976) & Krain (1981)

  6. Diffuser Inlet • Large inlet distortions due to impeller wake • Angle and velocity fluctuations • Distortions have least effect in passage diffusers than vaned, and most in vaneless • Mixing-out of jet-wake stimulated by presence of vanes

  7. Impeller-Diffuser Interaction • Vanes • Stationary vanes produce unsteady pressure disturbances to rotating impeller, Gallus et al. (2003) • Velocity fluctuations of 17-20% in vaneless space, Krain (1981) • Cause of backflow to impeller, Cui (2003) • Decrease traveled distance of impeller discharge distortion, Ghiglione et al. (1998)

  8. Impeller-Diffuser Interaction (cont’d) • Radial Gap • Too small = increase backflow, Cumpsty and Inoue (1984) • Too large = less mixing-out of jet-wake Gallus et al. (2003)

  9. Motivation • Why study impeller-diffuser interaction when numerous studies have been done? • All configurations are different • This project will lead into the study of a tandem-bladed impeller coupled with a fishtail diffuser • Study the magnitude and effect of pressure disturbances in vaneless space • Validate previously obtained CFD results Picture courtesy of Douglas Roberts (P&WC)

  10. Current Work • Design a test facility (SCR*) that simulates a typical radial impeller exit flow field in steady state through a non-rotating cascade configuration • 5 stationary radial impeller blades • Diffuser with 5 flat plate splitters • Pipe to provide required inlet flow • Obtain LDV data of flow field *Stationary Cascade Rig

  11. Purpose of SCR • CFD • Experimental validation of results obtained on SCR • Seeding flow distribution, flow patterns, etc… • Better understanding of how to apply LDV technique to a full-scale rig • Test use of very small optical access ports • Type of seeding for this specific flow Picture courtesy of Douglas Roberts (P&WC)

  12. SCR

  13. Impeller + Diffuser Close-up of impeller

  14. Optical Access 10mm diameter 15mm diameter • Upstream Impeller Blades • Blade passages ‘hub side’

  15. Seeding Ports Six Ports

  16. SCR Specifications • Outlet Ma: 0.85 • Total length: 2.0 [m] • Total height:1.4 [m] • Similar physical dimensions of full-scale rig

  17. CFD Analysis Mesh: 1.1 million tetrahedral + 0.2 million prism element mesh • ICEM CFD 10.0 with CFX 10.0 • SST k-ω model • Boundary Conditions: • Inlet: Ptotal = 172.4 [kPa] • Ttotal = 288.15 [K] • Outlet: Pstatic = 101.3 [kPa] mexpected= 0.245 kg/s mCFX= 0.242 kg/s

  18. Mach Number Contour Plot • Impeller-diffuser only • Region of high velocity in left most passage • Obtaining close to desired Ma of 0.85 at impeller exit 50% blade height

  19. Flow Behaviour • Shock wave at trailing edge of each blade • Passage width increasing, while height decreasing • Greater shock wave in left passage as result of diffuser sidewall

  20. Flow Behaviour

  21. Blade Passages Migration of high velocity region to shroud suction-side and vice versa Flow behaviour similar in passages up to outlet

  22. Pressure Contour Plot • impeller-diffuser only • Typical blade suction/pressure behaviour • Corresponding region of low pressure in left most passage Suction side Pressure side

  23. Conclusions • From CFX results • Presence of separation in diffuser • No separation in impeller • Good flow pattern agreement between blade passages • Close agreement between theoretically calculated and CFX values at boundaries • SCR will provide a good understanding of how to apply LDV technique in a high-speed, highly-confined, compressible flow

  24. Future Work • Experimental • Measurements in SCRF • Compare with current CFD results • Computational • Track seeding particles • Apply LDV technique and CFD model on full-scale rig at P&WC

  25. Acknowledgements • Advanced Fluid Mechanics Research Group • http://www.eng.uwo.ca/research/afm/default.htm • Kevin Barker and Doug Phillips • University Machine Shop • Rofiqul Islam • University of Calgary • Suresh Kacker, Douglas Roberts, Feng Shi and Peter Townsend • Pratt and Whitney Canada

  26. Thank You Questions?

More Related