1 / 4

Post Mortem Review Wednesday, April 23rd

Post Mortem Review Wednesday, April 23rd. What Worked Well. Components designed to be compatible with each other Simple project design Useful sample code Helpful technical support Efficient troubleshooting. What Went Wrong. Certain microcontroller limitations not considered (eg memory)

andren
Download Presentation

Post Mortem Review Wednesday, April 23rd

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Post Mortem Review Wednesday, April 23rd University of Portland School of Engineering

  2. What Worked Well • Components designed to be compatible with each other • Simple project design • Useful sample code • Helpful technical support • Efficient troubleshooting University of Portland School of Engineering

  3. What Went Wrong • Certain microcontroller limitations not considered (eg memory) • Backup LCD • Sight unseen & not budgeted • Sample code not guaranteed to work • Depth of documentation lacking • Microcontroller • Thermometer University of Portland School of Engineering

  4. Recommendations • When stuck, contact Tech Support • Learn to troubleshoot efficiently • With software, be careful with version control • Don’t be too ambitious! University of Portland School of Engineering

More Related