1 / 13

Review Zhuangzi’s Daoism

Review Zhuangzi’s Daoism. Pipes of tian as response to anti-language paradox Human debate about right dao is natural All participants are behaving naturally—natural pipes Grants claims of Mozi, Mencius & Yang But pulls 天 nature ’s normative teeth

angulo
Download Presentation

Review Zhuangzi’s Daoism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review Zhuangzi’s Daoism • Pipes of tian as response to anti-language paradox • Human debate about rightdao is natural • All participants are behaving naturally—natural pipes • Grants claims of Mozi, Mencius & Yang • But pulls 天nature’s normative teeth • Natural irrelevant as a reason for a dao

  2. Refutation of 天naturalIntuition • Mencius presupposes a 是 shithis:right • Shi the heart over other organs • Shi the sage’s heart (cultivation) over fools • Priority of 道daoguide over 天 tiannature:sky • Nature, the cosmos not a moral authority • Does not shi-feithis-not this是 非 • Care! Not ‘equal’ and not ‘don’t judge’ value • Equal is a normative judgment • Equally natural is irrelevant • Naturally judge value—always from some dao

  3. Indexicals and Relativism • The 墨辯 Later Mohist realists • World-guided language 同異similar-different • Language (v noise) is about things • However, what it is about is never fixed • Makes the point by using indexicals • Terms whose reference changes • E.g. I, you, today, here, now • Key indexical distinction is this/that是彼 • Anything can be a 'this' or a 'that'

  4. Questions Quiz: Analyze and evaluate Descartes’ argument “I think therefore I am” (Valid? Sound?)

  5. No Argument: Punning Shift • Slides from是彼this/that to是 非right/wrong • Evaluative judgments comparative • Beautiful/ugly, good/bad, large, tall, before • Hui Shi’s contribution • Language based on conventional indexicals shi-feithis-not this是非 • Each word 是this-right of a thing—or not • If language is not fixed, is it any different from twittering? • Or not?

  6. What Conclusion? • All is one? (no distinctions real) • 惠 施 (Hui shi) draws this conclusion from comparative relativism • 天 地一體 "Heaven and earth form one body • Zhuangzi rebuts it • From where do we conclude that? • All judgment is perspectival • What perspective makes them all one? • Tuesday’s warning—relativism dangerous and hard • No “everything” judgments • No absolutes from relativist premises

  7. All is One? • This is an anti-language judgment • No distinctions, no names • Zhuangzi points out a consequence of the paradox • If I make the judgment that all is one • Then that one and the judgment makes two • The two and recognition that there are two make a third • Now no one can stop the progression. • Don't make the first judgment!

  8. Ultimate Perspective?:Dao Axis道樞 • The point from which we have an infinite possibility of judgment 是非 • But no judgment is actually made • Like Laozi’s child. . . . • To make it would be to step off the axis • Start down one of the possible paths • Still we do make judgments • But always from somewhere on a dao • And on our way somewhere • In awareness that in other positions, I would make different judgment

  9. Can't (Shouldn't?) Escape From Perspectives • The Handan walk • Even if all humans agree, it doesn't make it right • Deer and fish • Even if all natural kinds agree, doesn't make it right • Maybe valuing life is not a mistake • Dream of the skull-pillow • Conclusion: no one knows anything? • No • I don't know if I have the correct distinction between knowing and not-knowing

  10. So what advice? • Truth relativism too strong • Stop making judgments? No. • All perspectives are equal? No • Hitler is just like Gandhi? No • Strong skepticism doesn't entail anything • Local strong skepticism seems wrong • Fish happiness and skill • This is mild skepticism • No argument against your perspective • Keep making judgments about others • Just awareness that there are alternatives • Hard to convince them and vice versa

  11. So what advice? (2) • Be open to alternative perspectives • Youth and flexibility • The axis and the child • Problem (?) • Do the usual • Not anti-conventional or anti-language • But only pragmatic conclusion • The usual is communicable and hence useful • The end of the matter • Skill transcendence. • Cook Ding庖 丁story • Loss of self in activity • Spontaneity, tranquility, satisfaction • Exercise of acquired skills

  12. Problems • Pull in opposite directions • Skill transcendence and openness • Openness and acceptance of convention • Skill and defect • Knowledge is limited and life is unlimited • Aiming for perfect skill is a mistake

  13. Back to the West Existentialism: Western Daoism Or Daoism: Chinese existentialism??

More Related