1 / 25

IAGA 2010, China Changchun

IAGA 2010, China Changchun Geomagnetic field measurement and data analysis of the Cheongyang observatory in Korea. Po Gyu Park, Wan-Seop Kim. Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS). Sung-Dae Hong, Myeong-Son Yu, Se-Jong Lee.

anjolie-bradford
Download Presentation

IAGA 2010, China Changchun

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IAGA 2010, China Changchun Geomagnetic field measurement and data analysis of the Cheongyang observatory in Korea Po Gyu Park, Wan-Seop Kim Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) Sung-Dae Hong, Myeong-Son Yu, Se-Jong Lee Korea Meteorological Administration Juwan Kim Chonbuk National University

  2. I. Location and purposes • Geomagnetic Observatory in Cheongyang(CYN) : operating by KMA (CYN, 126º 51′ 28″, 36º21′ 56″, 150 m) • To measure geomagnetic field precisely • To study the possibility of forecasting of earthquake activity. • To join INTERMAGNET • CYN consisted of 4 huts is located in a mountainous area

  3. Korea 동해 Cheongyang Cheongyang (CYN)

  4. Cheongyang (CYN) CYN old temple

  5. II. Instrumentsand noise measurements • INTERMAGNET recommendations • 3-axis fluxgate magnetometer(DMI), proton magnetometer (GEM), D/I magnetometer (MinGeo) • Nonmagnetic material used for huts, measurement of magnetic properties for rocks and soil • AC magnetic field noise ( ~1 nT in 60 Hz) • DC magnetic stray field of car effect are measured (Excel car, 0.05 nT in 70 m). • Comparison between Cs-He and proton magnetometer • Absolute measurements (10 months, D=-8º, I=58º)

  6. Magnetic properties(rock) SEM analysis

  7. Rock Magn. Properties Paramagnetic !

  8. Soil Magn. Properties Soft ferromagnetic !

  9. Magnetic effect (car) • Axcell: 0.05 nT ( 70 m ) • Tico: 0.05 nT ( 50 m ) * Iron(1 T) : 1 nT (100 m )

  10. Comparison (Proton and Cs-He)

  11. III. D/I measurement -Trained by KIGAM(Dr. Lim) and KAKIOKA(Mr. Minamoto)

  12. Declination (Oct. 15 2009-Sept. 7 2010)

  13. Inclination

  14. X-base

  15. Y-base

  16. Z-base

  17. IV. Difference of vector and scalar data Vector : orthogonal (3-axis) Scalar : Dead zone

  18. Difference of vector and scalar data(1)

  19. Difference of vector and scalar data(2)

  20. V. Uncertainty (Error?) Parameter associated with the result of a measurement, that characterizes the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand (VIM2 :International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology) • ISO Guide, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements(GUM), ISO, 1995. • Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, NIST Technical Note 1297, NIST, 1993. -Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements, EURACHEM, 1995.　 -DIN 1319-4, Gundlagen der Messtechnik

  21. 5 steps in Meas. Uncer. evaluation • Modeling the measurement • Identifying uncertainty components • for each input quantity • Evaluating standard uncertainty • Type A, Type B • Sensitivity coefficient • Combining standard uncertainties • of input quantities • Coverage factor • Expanded uncertainty

  22. Uncertainty budgets table(ex.) Extended Uncertainty : coverage factor(k) x Uc * ( Confidence level 95%, k=2 ) ex) Total intensity : (49598.2 ± 0.1) nT ((Reading-0.5)±0.1) nT

  23. VI. Future work(CYN) - D/I measurement continually • Comparison (Proton and Cs-He Magn.) • Evaluation of uncertainties(MFD, D/I?) • Join in INTERMAGNET in 2011 • Time sync. for 1 s data • Contribution to Geomagnetic society

  24. Purpose of magnetic compass? A propitious site for a grave KRISS

  25. References • V. Ya. Shifrin, Po Gyu Park et al., “Experimental estimation of the accuracy of medern scalar quantum magnetometer…”, Phys. Ear. Plan. Inter. 166(2), pp.147-152(2008). • P. G. park, Y. G. Kim, V. Ya. Shifrin, "Maintenance of Magnetic Flux Density Standards on the Basis of Proton Gyromagnetic Ratio at KRISS" IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 54(2), pp.734-737(2005). • V. Ya. Shifrin, V.N.Khorev, A.Ye.Shilov and P.G.Park, “The long-term stability of an atomic magnetic resonance standard system…’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 52(2), pp.433-435(2003). • P. G. Park, Y. G. Kim, V. Ya. Shifrin, and V. N. Khorev, "Precise standard system for low dc magnetic field reproduction", Rev. Sci. Instrum., 73(8), pp.3107-3111(2002). • V. Ya. Shifrin, E. B. Alexandrov, T. I. Chikvadze, V. N. Khorev, Po Gyu Park, “Magnetic flux density standard for geomagnetometer”, Metrologia, 37(3), pp.219-227 (2000). • V. Ya. Shifrin, Po Gyu Park, V. N. Khorev, Chang Ho Choi, C. S. Kim, “A New Low-Field Determination of the Proton Gyromagnetic Ratio in Water”, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 47(3), pp.638-643(1998). • V. Ya. Shifrin, Po Gyu Park, Cheol Gi Kim, V.N. Khorev, Chang Ho Choi, “Experimental Determination of the Gyromagnetic Ratio of the He-4 Atom in Terms of that of the He-3 Nucleus”, IEEE. Trans. Meas. Instrum IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 46(2), pp. 97-100 (1997).

More Related