1 / 70

Delia Hasch

Delia Hasch. TMDs & friends from lepton scattering -experimental overview-. outline:. introduction: some reminders… status Sivers DF Collins DF azimuthal dependence of unpolarised xsection the ‘soon to come’ menu.

anneke
Download Presentation

Delia Hasch

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Delia Hasch TMDs & friends from lepton scattering-experimental overview- outline: • introduction: some reminders… • status Sivers DF • Collins DF • azimuthal dependence of unpolarised xsection • the ‘soon to come’ menu INT workshop on “3D parton structure of the nucleon encoded in GPDs & TMDs”,Seattle, Sept. 14-18 2009

  2. 1/7/07@ 1:09:56 am experimental prerequisites main players in the game: • longitudinally polarised d • long.+transv. polarised p • ~full hadron ID 27 GeV e+/- till 2007 • long.+transv. polarised effective d • long.+transv. polarised effective p • ~full hadron ID 190 GeV m CLAS: long. polarised effective p HallA: long.+transv. polarised effective n ≈6 GeV e- HALL A

  3. deep-inelastic scattering factorisation: Q2 1 GeV2

  4. hadron production @RHIC p0 and jet production xsection vs pT compared to theory

  5. hadron production no SIDIS xsection measurements @HERMES and CLAS  pion multiplicities compared to theory: DSS:fragmentation functions from combined NLO analysis of single-inclusive hadron production in e+e-, pp and SIDIS p+ [deFlorian,Sassot,Stratmann arXiv:0708.0769] p-

  6. hadron production no SIDIS xsection measurements @HERMES and CLAS  pion multiplicities CLAS p0 compared to HERMES and to DSS:

  7. SIDIS cross section sXY beam:target: lSL,ST

  8. SIDIS cross section

  9. leading-tw distribution functions chiral-odd pdf & FF ‘Amsterdam notation’

  10. leading-tw distribution functions on the menu today

  11. leading-tw distribution functions @leading twist, integrated over pT: ‘transversity’

  12. leading-tw distribution functions @leading twist, no pT integration: ‘Boer- Mulders’ ‘Kotzinian- Mulders’ ‘transversity’ ‘pretzelosity’ ‘Sivers’

  13. asymmetries and amplitudes + …

  14. asymmetries and amplitudes Collins moment Sivers moment  taking also into account of the unpolarised cross section

  15. spin-orbit correlations Sivers function: [Matthias Burkardt] a non-zero Sivers fct. requires non-zero orbital angular momentum !

  16. ep  hX Sivers amplitudes [PRL94(2005)] first observation of T-odd Sivers effect in SIDIS u quark dominance suggests sizable u quark orbital motion

  17. ep  hX Sivers amplitudes [arXiv:0906.3918] final data set! first observation of T-odd Sivers effect in SIDIS u quark dominance suggests sizable u quark orbital motion

  18. Sivers amplitudesforp clear rise with z rise at low Ph T plateau at high Ph T p+ dominated by u-quarks  u-quark Sivers DF < 0 [arXiv:0906.3918]

  19. rise at low Ph T plateau at high Ph T Sivers amplitudesforp clear rise with z p+ dominated by u-quarks  u-quark Sivers DF < 0 cancellation for p- : u and d quark Sivers DF of opposite sign [arXiv:0906.3918]

  20. Sivers amplitudesforp [PLB673(2009)] clear rise with z rise at low Ph T plateau at high Ph T p+ dominated by u-quarks  u-quark Sivers DF < 0 cancellation for p- : u and d quark Sivers DF of opposite sign all asymmetries on deuterium target ≈ zero! [arXiv:0906.3918]

  21. Sivers amplitudesforp proton data ? [arXiv:0906.3918]

  22. Sivers distribution for valence quarks transverse SSA of pion cross section difference: Sivers distribution for u-valence is large & <0 or Sivers distr. for d- valence >> u-valence (unlikely)

  23. ep  KX rise at low Ph T plateau at high Ph T Sivers: kaon amplitudes clear rise with z slightly positive

  24. Sivers: the “kaon challenge” p+/ K+ production dominated by scattering off u-quarks

  25. Sivers: the “kaon challenge” p+/ K+ production dominated by scattering off u-quarks • &  non-trival role of sea quarks • convolution integral in numerator depends on kT dependence of FF • differences in dependences on kinematics integrated over

  26. role of sea quarks strange sea pdf [PLB666(2008), 446] • differences biggest in region where strange sea is most different from light sea

  27. see talk by A. Prokudin fragmentation function  e+e- extracting the Sivers function use parametrisations of unpolarised fragmentation functions

  28. h q q h transverse nucleon structure transversity via Collins fragmentationfct.

  29. ep  pX Collins amplitudes p+ distinctive pattern: • p+ positive • p0 ≈zero • p- negative isospin relation for p triplet fulfilled p0 p-

  30. ep  pX Collins amplitudes p+ distinctive pattern: • p+ positive • p0 ≈zero • p- negative p0 approximation: u-quark dominance • Collins FF has favoured (up+) and unfavoured (up-) transitions of similar size and opposite sign p-

  31. ep  pX Collins amplitudes p+ proton data distinctive pattern: • p+ positive • p0 ≈zero • p- negative p0 approximation: u-quark dominance • Collins FF has favoured (up+) and unfavoured (up-) transitions of similar size and opposite sign [note sign change due to different angle definition ] p- all asymmetries on deuterium target ≈ zero!

  32. ep  hX Collins amplitudes p+ K+ amplitudes consistent with p+amplitudes as expected from u-quark dominance p0 K- of opposite sign from p- (K- is all-sea object) p-

  33. see talk by A. Prokudin e+ e- extraction of transversity from Collins asymmetries

  34. Collins amplitudes-- extras: 2D binning -- kinematic dependencies often don’t factorise  bin in as many independent variables as possible: z @`fixed’ x Ph @`fixed’ z T x @`fixed’ z z @`fixed’ Ph T

  35. Collins amplitudes-- extras: 2D binning -- kinematic dependencies often don’t factorise  bin in as many independent variables as possible:

  36. alternative probe for transversity: 2-hadrons

  37. 2-hadron production: interference fragmentation function between pions in s-wave and p-wave • only relative momentum of hadron pair relevant  integration over transverse momentum of hadron pair simplifies factorisation (collinear!) and Q2 evolution • however cross section becomes very complicated (depends on 9! variables)  sensitive to detector acceptance effects

  38. extraction of p+p- amplitudes …facilitate interpretation q integration projects out sp and pp only for full theta acceptance:

  39. extraction of p+p- amplitudes …facilitate interpretation q integration projects out sp and pp only for full theta acceptance: q acceptance is momentum dependent: full acceptance

  40. extraction of p+p- amplitudes  bin data in q in addition: • symmeterization around q=p/2: & fit

  41. p+p- amplitudes [JHEP 0806.017]

  42. h+h- amplitudes [JHEP 0806.017] [note sign change due to different angle definition]

  43. h+h- amplitudes [JHEP 0806.017] [note sign change due to different angle definition]

  44. [Bacchetta, Radici PRD74(2006)] Mpp (GeV) models for 2-hadron asymmetries

  45. [Bacchetta, Radici PRD74(2006)] Mpp (GeV) models for 2-hadron asymmetries [note sign change due to different angle definition]

  46. azimuthal dependence of the unpolarised cross section spin-orbit effect (Boer-Mulders DF): correlation between quark transverse motion and transverse spin

  47. unpolarised cross section access to intrinsic quark transverse momentum

  48. analysis challenge Monte Carlo: generated in 4p measured inside acceptance • acceptance and radiative effects generate cos(nf) moments

  49. analysis challenge Monte Carlo: generated in 4p measured inside acceptance • acceptance and radiative effects generate cos(nf) moments • 5D unfolding of detector and radiative effects:

  50. <cosf>: intrinsic quark transverse momentum • very similar result for deuterium

More Related