1 / 31

Missing B-tracks in L1 trigger

Missing B-tracks in L1 trigger. Federica Legger. Summary. Motivations Method used L1 flow and main failures Breakdown for some representative channels Results A case study: B d  p + p - L1 failures correlation Origin of the decision tracks Status and plans. Motivations.

antoniovera
Download Presentation

Missing B-tracks in L1 trigger

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Missing B-tracks in L1 trigger Federica Legger

  2. Summary • Motivations • Method used • L1 flow and main failures • Breakdown for some representative channels • Results • A case study: Bdp+ p- • L1 failures correlation • Origin of the decision tracks • Status and plans

  3. Motivations LHCb trigger TDR (September 2003) • TDR L1 efficiencies… • or inefficiencies: why do we lose 37.3% of the events for Bdp+ p- (easy channel)?? • Some bugs corrected after TDR Post-TDR study to better understand L1 behaviour

  4. What I did…(I) • Take some representative channels, and select events which pass L0 and the offline selection ( reconstructible), but that are rejected by L1 Hadronic Muon Electro magnetic

  5. …what I did… (II) • Look for signal decay tree (MC Truth); • Consider B daughter which is more likely to trigger: • In the cases where there are more than one particle with the same probability to trigger (Bd p+p-), I consider the one with the highest Pt; • Bdp+ p- • Bs Dsk • BdF Ks • Bs J/ (m+ m-) F • Bs J/ (e+ e-) F • BdK*g

  6. …what I did (III) • Associate MC particle to L1 2D and 3D tracks; • Look what happened to signal track and see why it didn’t trigger; • Classify events according to trigger failures; • Study of L1 failures correlations in Bdp+ p-(both pions taken in account).

  7. (r,z) plane r z Match L0 m to 2D tracks (2<16) L1 flow (I) VELO hits NO 2D Reco YES 2D PV, IP2D IP2D cut .15 <IP2D< 3 mm NO NO Muon YES YES 3D Reco NO YES Track rejected 3D PV, IP3D

  8. m match to retrieve tracks for dimuon mass bonus (out of scope) Match to TT or m (Pt) If not assign default 400 MeV/c One of the two highest Pt track (PT1 and PT2) D L1 flow (II) Backward, Weird IP (-2<IP3D<5mm), IP3D cut (.15<IP3D<2mm) NO YES PT, IPS Decision track NO YES Track rejected L1 Plane cut D > L1 equivalent 4% min. bias ret. YES NO L1 YES L1 NO

  9. L1 code • TDR baseline version + some bugs fixed (PVZ @ 100mm) • No bonus system (dimuon mass, electron and g transverse energies) • No multiple PV treatment (implemented in new L1 code) TDR now PVZ PVZ

  10. L1 flow (I) Main failures VELO hits NO 2D Reco YES 2D PV, IP2D Lost@2D 1 IP2D cut .15 <IP2D< 3 mm NO NO Muon YES YES 3D Reco NO YES Lost@3D 2 Track rejected 3D PV, IP3D

  11. L1 flow (II) Lost@3D Backward, Weird IP (-2<IP3D<5mm), IP3D cut (.15<IP3D<2mm) NO YES Main failures PT, IPS Low PT Decision track 3 NO YES Track rejected L1 Plane cut D > L1 equivalent 4% min. bias ret. Small D 4 YES NO L1 YES L1 NO

  12. Bdp+ p- Bs Ds K BdF Ks Bs J/ (e+e-) F Bd K* g Main failures To be treated separately Main loss (~60%) ~10% ~10% ~15%

  13. IP2D cut Or Muon 2D track MC truth B daughter Lost@2D Correct Wrong 2. Tracks lost at 2D

  14. Bdp+ p- Bs Ds K BdF Ks Bs J/ (e+e-) F Bd K* g Absolute Relative Tracks lost at 2D Main loss ~20% OK

  15. IP3D cut IP2D cut Or Muon 2D track 3D track MC truth B daughter Lost@2D Correct Wrong Lost@3D 3. Tracks lost at 3D Correct Wrong

  16. Bdp+ p- Bs Ds K BdF Ks Bs J/ (e+e-) F Bd K* g Absolute Relative Tracks lost at 3D ~2% Main loss

  17. 2D track 3D track IP2D cut Or Muon IP3D cut MC truth B daughter Lost@2D Low PT Default Pt 400 MeV/c Measured low Pt Correct Wrong Correct Wrong Lost@3D 4. Tracks lost because of low Pt Correct Wrong

  18. Bdp+ p- Bs Ds K BdF Ks Bs J/ (e+e-) F Bd K* g Absolute Relative Tracks lost because of low PT insignificant Main loss (~10%)

  19. 3D track 2D track IP3D cut IP2D cut Or Muon MC truth 5. Tracks lost because of small D B daughter Lost@2D Low PT Default Pt 400 MeV/c Measured low Pt Correct Wrong Correct Wrong Lost@3D Small D PT1 PT2 Correct Wrong Correct Wrong Correct Wrong

  20. Tracks lost because of small D Correct > Wrong Correct < Wrong Almost 100% no measured Pt

  21. Bdp+ p- Bs Ds K BdF Ks Bs J/ (e+e-) F Bd K* g Tracks lost because of small D B track is more likely to be PT1

  22. IP2D cut Or Muon 2D track IP3D cut 3D track MC truth Summary for all channels but muons 60% 13% B daughter Lost@2D Low PT 12% 3% Default Pt 400 MeV/c Measured low Pt 37% 20% 0% 1% 12% Correct Wrong 15% Correct Wrong Lost@3D Small D 10% PT1 PT2 1% 1% 10% 2% 2% 1% Correct Wrong Correct Wrong Correct Wrong

  23. Bdp+ p- Bs Ds K BdF Ks Bs J/ (m+m-) F Bs J/ (e+e-) F Bd K* g L1 Design vs. Resolution failures (wrong+failed) (correct boxes) Best channel 50%, 50% Enhanced by bonus...

  24. Results (I) • Main failure: • IP2D cut~60%, wrong (40%) + correct (~20%) • Main loss at 3D: • failed 3D reco (~8%), worse than failed 2D reco (~3%), could also be the associator (MCParticle2L1Track) IP cut IP cut IP2D p+ IP2D e+

  25. IP cut IP cut IP3D p+ IP3D e+ Results (II) • IP3D cutnot very significative(~2%) • No decision track because Pt is too low (~10%): • no measured Pt (~100%)failed TT reco • Rejected decision tracks (~15%) : • if PTMC we would gain ~5% of the evts.

  26. The muon channel • L0 Muons (63%) go to 3D reco even if they do not pass the IP2D cut (73%) • 10% evts lost at 2D (3% wrong) • Main loss at 3D: IP3D cut (61%) • 99% were L0 muons • 13% evts wrongly rejected • These tracks could be later use for dimuon mass bonus (out of scope) • Low Pt tracks: 3% • No decision track: 18% • Worst design (71% vs. 29%) BONUS system

  27. A case study: Bd p+p- Consider the two pions to study failures correlation ! L1 failures • NO2D No 2D track • NO3D No 3D track • IP2D doesn’t pass IP2D cut and is not a m • PT1 Leading track • PT2 2nd leading track • LOWPT Not one of the two leading tracks • IP3D doesn’t pass IP3D cut

  28. A case study: Bd p+p- Main loss is IP2D cut Even if other track is PT1!!

  29. Origin of the decision tracks Bd p+p- L0 && !L1 && SEL L0 && L1 && SEL

  30. PT1 PT2 L0 && !L1 && SEL L0 && L1 && SEL

  31. Status and plans • Study completed; • Note with full results almost ready; • Write a Tool to automatically flag trigger failures and include it into new L1 code.

More Related