300 likes | 484 Views
The SANRU Program of ECC & IMA World Health. SANRU is currently assisting 115 health zones in DRC with support from various agencies and partners. Origins of the SANRU Program were the well known USAID funded SANRU Projects. SANRU I 1980-86 50 health zones 10 Million
E N D
SANRU is currently assisting 115 health zones in DRC with support from various agencies and partners.
Origins of the SANRU Program were the well known USAID funded SANRU Projects SANRU I 1980-86 50 health zones 10 Million SANRU II 1986-1991 100 health zones 40 Million SANRU III 2000-2006 56 health zones 28 Million
SANRU III Project was built on partnerships with U.S. faith-based partners (Catholic and Protestant) during a time of conflict and division in the DRC SANRU III Assistance to 56 HZs (2000-2006) 5 year 28 Million USD 56 Health Zones
In 2006 following the release of the ‘Fragile States Policy’ Project AXxes replaced the SANRU III project 3 year 42 Million USD 57 Health zones 5 year 28 Million USD 56 Health Zones
Three Components of Project AXxes for HZ Development: A: Increaseaccessto… integrated PHC B: Increase capacity of Health Zones & referral system C:Reinforce nationalprograms& provincial/district offices
1. Povertyand (in)access to care Photo: Lodja.June 2008/Mulongo
2. Infrastructure (or lack of) Photo: ECC/AXxes 2008
3. Decreasing means of commercial transport Photo Goma Apr 08/cnn.com
4. Constraints of importing goods Photo: Route de Matadi Apr.08/Clemmer
5. Weak Government Support to Health Zones Photo: General Hospital, South Kivu 2004/Clemmer
6. Chronic Insecurity Photo Mission Hospital Occupied by armed elements:. South Kivu. Apr 02/Cemmer
7. Uncoordinated donor coordination Photo: Moanza Health Zone: Apr 06/Clemmer
8. Resurging Epidemics Photo: Ebola.Outbreak.Ground Zero. Mweka.Oct 07/Clemmer
9. Retention of trained personnel Photo: ITM Sona Bata. 2004/Clemmer
Trends Observed • Geographic shift of USAID assistance (from 8 provinces to 4 with focus on south + eastern DRC) • Decrease in support to co-managed HZ partnerships (33% in AXxes vs. 70% for SANRU II) • Decreased leveraging with US-based partners historically linked to some health zones. • Possible fragmentation of Appui Global with vertical projects and multiple funding streams.
2) Re-establish assistance to 30 former SANRU III HZs currently without a development partner
3) Expand to 20 (or more) additional HZs with US-based partners to leverage and coordinate additional aid. 4) Support Geographic Equity in Appui Global & Integrated Projects