1 / 11

November 14, 2012 US-Canada Northern Oil and Gas Research Forum Anchorage, Alaska

Building Sustainable Communities in the Arctic: the Resources and Sustainability in the Arctic Project. November 14, 2012 US-Canada Northern Oil and Gas Research Forum Anchorage, Alaska . Lee Huskey University of Alaska Anchorage. ReSDA ?.

arin
Download Presentation

November 14, 2012 US-Canada Northern Oil and Gas Research Forum Anchorage, Alaska

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Building Sustainable Communities in the Arctic: the Resources and Sustainability in the Arctic Project November 14, 2012 US-Canada Northern Oil and Gas Research Forum Anchorage, Alaska Lee Huskey University of Alaska Anchorage

  2. ReSDA? Largest social science research project ever proposed for the Circumpolar North currently involves 51 researchers at 29 universities in 9 countries The primary objective of the research will be to develop innovative approaches to using natural resources to improve the well-being of northern communities while preserving the region’s unique ecosystem. Focus on questions of finding out how to maximize benefits of resource development to northern regions and communities and minimize the social, economic, cultural, and environmental costs.

  3. International Team of Researchers

  4. Why ReSDA? • The need for research useful to communities: Increased economic activity in the Arctic and limited, scattered, social science research. • Antecedents: Social Economy Research Network for Northern Canada and its community partners (Northern Research Institute in Yukon, Aurora Research Institute in NWT, Nunavut Research Institute in Iqaluit, Makivik, Labrador Institute, Arctic Co-ops) • Antecedents: University of the Arctic workshops, ESF Boreas program, Alaska OCS Studies Program • Funded by Canada Social Science and Humanities Research Council

  5. Initial Projects: Gap Analysis • What do we know about the effects of resource development on the north? Where do we go from there? • Main themes: • History of Resource Development • Impacts of development on Northern communities • Measuring impacts • Resource Revenue regimes • Impacts assessment • Regional economic development • Community well being and development • Community-Industry relations • Impact Benefit Agreements • Comprehensive land claims and protection of livelihoods • Traditional knowledge and resource development • Resources and Environmental Issues • Climate change

  6. Initial Project: IRC Social Indicators • Purpose: develop a set of measurable, reliable and accessible indicators to monitor socio-economic conditions in the Inuvialuit Region with an emphasis on tracing impacts of resource development • Partners: ReSDA, ASI, Inuvialuit Regional Corporation (IRC), NWT Bureau of Statistics • Precedents: NWT Diamond mine socio-economic agreement, OCS Social Indicators, Arctic Social Indicators • IRC Data Base: Early collaboration with NWT Bureau of Statistics (data back to 1991).

  7. Why Social Indicators? • “Find a small number of tractable indicators that can be used in tracking changes in key elements in the Arctic over time.” • Track changes in well-being over time and compare. Look at impact of particular events on social welfare. • Arctic Social Indicators domains: fate control, cultural integrity, contact with nature, material well-being, education, and demographic health.

  8. IRC Project • Database for long period (1991) • Recent resource development activity • Desire of IRC to understand effects of resource development. • Problem with the availability and timeliness of data, especially at the community level.

  9. Inuvialuit Region Trends 1986-2010 • Material well-being • Unemployment – unchanged • Participation rate • Professional employment • Income support payments • Ownership rate • Households in core need • Education • Population with high school diploma • Social • Lone parent families • Crime • Teen birth • Mobility • Traditional activities • Hunt & Fish • County food, % • Speak Language • Positive • Negative

  10. Inuvialuit Region Baseline Analysis • Regional Comparisons: • Internal differences: drastic gap between Inuvik and other communities • IR better than other NWT regions: unemployment, engagement in traditional activities, land claim status and fate control • IR close to average: incomes, dependency on government transfers, consumption of county food, education • IR worse: language retention (23%), Aboriginal leadership, population dynamics (out-migration) • Compared to other Inuit communities (in Nunavut): • Generally good in material well-being • Very low in language retention, low on consumption of traditional food, fate control

  11. Contact Information • ReSDAhttp://dl1.yukoncollege.yk.ca/resda • Social Indicators project andrey.petrov@uni.edu • IRC data base www.inuvialuitindicators.com • ReSDA project leader: Chris Southcott, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario

More Related