200 likes | 376 Views
LCLS Week. LCLS Project Management Update M. Reichanadter / SLAC. LCLS Performance – Aug05. LCLS TEC Planned Spending / Month. LCLS currently spending and performing ~$3M/mo but planning at ~$5M/mo. Leads to variances unless we can perform. Is this a true work plan?.
E N D
LCLS Week LCLS Project Management Update M. Reichanadter / SLAC
LCLS TEC Planned Spending / Month • LCLS currently spending and performing ~$3M/mo but planning at ~$5M/mo. • Leads to variances unless we can perform. • Is this a true work plan?
LCLS Cost and Schedule Performance • Biggest SV (In, UN) appear to be due to an inaccurate plan not a schedule delay. • LCLS TEC in the Yellow in Aug05 (5 months after baseline) • Use the 6-mo look-ahead
LCLS Cost and Schedule Performance • Biggest SV (In, UN) appear to be due to an inaccurate plan not a schedule delay. • LCLS TEC in the Yellow in Aug05 (5 months after baseline) • Use the 6-mo look-ahead
Injector SPA Injector will be ~70% complete in Jan06
Linac SPA Big spikes. Procurement payments? Are Managers planning a 6-month look-ahead? PMCS experts are at your disposal
LCLS Summary Schedule – Aug05 • Highlights • Schedule Float • Mar05 213 days • CP - Und B.O. - Und Inst to 1st Light • Sep05 - 177 days • CP - Und B.O. – Und Del - Und Inst to 1st Light • This needs to be fixed ASAP. • FY05 Shutdown • ~1 month • FY06 shutdown • ~ 4 months • FFTB Shutdown • Jul06 • LCLS may request advancing this date
LCLS L1 – L2 Milestone Performance LCLS showing good milestone performance @ L2 in FY05
LCLS L3 Milestone Performance – FY05 LCLS showing good milestone performance @ L3 in FY05
LCLS L3 Milestone Performance – FY06 FY06 will be a key year for LCLS. Boost Phase
Contingency Allocation to Date 77 BCR’s is high 5 months after baseline • CF: Interim work on CF + T2 increase, MMF and S20. CM/GC and 30% estimate overruns will require significant additional contingency. • UN: Undulator materials • Apr05 rebaseline covered schedule variances in Injector-Linac.
LCLS Contingency Performance Contingency allocation has been reasonable to date. CM/GC + 30% CF estimate will make large draws on contingency in Oct05. Need to hold the line on contingency until Mar06 (CF construction bids).
Richard M. BoyceDeputy to the Chief Engineer • Role/Responsibility; • Technical integration and coordination of LCLS deliverables; • includes space and logistics planning and coordination of deliverables to SLAC from its partner laboratories. • Serve as the Project Office point of contact for technical, integration and installation reviews for the LCLS project. Concur with System Manager’s review agenda, scope, minutes and/or any actions. • In close collaboration with the Quality Assurance Manager, the DCE will coordinate Engineering Specification Documentation and ensure that uniform standards are applied across the project. • Serve as a LCLS liaison to the SSRL division (other divisions?). • Member of the LCLS Project Office and Change Control Board. • Carrying out the LCLS Chief Engineer functions when the LCLS Chief Engineer is unavailable .
LCLS Staffing • 112.0 FTE’s (Sep05) • Staffing nearly complete • Still a few more to go • Does not include additional staff under contract • Jacobs • PMCS – AIM • Consultants • CM/GC (Oct05) FY05 funding @ SLAC Award Title I • Good News: LCLS has staffed up at the planned rate. • Are they all working on the right things? • SV says perhaps not Treading water. CR or full-funding?
Davis – Bacon Approval Thanks to Richard M for working this issue!
LCLS Technical Specifications Status • LCLS Specs • Jul05 • PRD’s @ 37% • ICD’s @ 5% • 67% is a big improvement but still more to go • ESD’s particularly IN, LN, and UN need more effort. • Physics support being added to Photon System
Near-term LCLS challenges • LCLS is the execution phase of the project. Plans have been made, costs estimated, project approved … now it’s time to execute. • FY05-FY06 critical time (boost phase) of the project. Performance (solve problems, make decisions) is key. • Follow the P3 plan (Use the 6-month look ahead as a roadmap) • Less BCR’s and effort replanning your work each month. • Watch staffing levels (cost variances). Are the teams working on the plan? • Continue to document PRD’s, ICD’s ESD’s, & RDS’s. Mature design reduces risk. • Use the Risk Registry pro-actively to manage your work (not just a DOE requirement) • Prepare for start of LCLS Construction (CD-3b) • T2 CF is critical path for construction start • CM/GC on-board (Good news!) • PSAD will require effort from all groups • System Engineering and Integration • Start with ICD’s, PRD’s, ESD’s are the starting point • RMB and DM will maintain uniformity and high-quality across the LCLS • Need sustained effort on design reviews to mature design, track progress and identify integration issues. • Great Job so far! • MMF/S20/S24/FFTB under construction • Undulators under fabrication • Overall milestone performance is good • Shutdown going reasonably well so far • T2 >30%, CM/GC on-board • ISMS compliant. Be safe!