1 / 4

Nuclear Infrastructure Development: Insights and Recommendations for New Entrants

This presentation provides valuable insights and recommendations derived from four break-out sessions on nuclear infrastructure development. It covers experiences, lessons learned, challenges, and recommendations for countries considering nuclear power programs. Key points address public acceptance, vendor engagement, national strategies, and the role of the IAEA in early stages.

arthurcoleman
Download Presentation

Nuclear Infrastructure Development: Insights and Recommendations for New Entrants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group: Nuclear Infrastructure Development Break-out Session1. EXPERIENCES • Have tried to avoid contact with vendors since this could be looked as if we already had a decision taken (public opinion problems). • Don’t want to have the pressure from one particular country (or technology) at this stage. TM/WS 9-12February 2010

  2. Group: Nuclear Infrastructure Development Break-out Session2. LESSONS LEARNED • If there is no serious and well developed program, vendors will not be interested in selling. • Vendors are very careful in not getting engaged in processes that are at a very early stage. • At very early stages relations through the IAEA may be a good approach. TM/WS 9-12February 2010

  3. Group: Nuclear Infrastructure Development Break-out Session 3.DIFFICULTIES/CHALANGES • Public acceptance of NPP (safety and spent fuel) is a problem. • The information publicly available is not sufficient, but approaching to vendors may be seen as a commitment. • On the other hand vendors are getting selective and looking at what extend countries have a full commitment with the program, since resources are limited. • There are supply chain problems and delivery time could be very long. • For newcomers, competing with big countries re-starting their programs may be difficult, particularly for very small countries. TM/WS 9-12February 2010

  4. Group: Nuclear Infrastructure Development Break-out Session 4.RECOMMENDATIONS • Need to have very early on programs in place for educating public about nuclear. • Countries need to realistically asses weather they do need nuclear or not before start thinking about technology. • Considerations about the long term national strategy regarding NPP has to be considered when selecting the technology. • If is clear that a country has a well developed program and a serious order is coming, vendors could develop more capacity. • Openness and transparency in the process (from both sides) is required, so vendors and countries know what is happening on the other side so can act according to it. • IAEA is a very good source of information at early stages. TM/WS 9-12February 2010

More Related