1 / 19

XFEL Oscillator in ERLs

XFEL Oscillator in ERLs. R. Hajima Japan Atomic Energy Agency March 4, 2010. X-ray FEL Oscillator. K-J. Kim et al., PRL (2008), PRST-AB (2009). Typical electron beam parameters for XFELO. Energy, charge, emittance, repetition are similar to ERL beams. ERL Injector Performance.

ashlyn
Download Presentation

XFEL Oscillator in ERLs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. XFEL Oscillator in ERLs R. Hajima Japan Atomic Energy Agency March 4, 2010.

  2. X-ray FEL Oscillator K-J. Kim et al., PRL (2008), PRST-AB (2009) Typical electron beam parameters for XFELO Energy, charge, emittance, repetition are similar to ERL beams. R. Hajima

  3. ERL Injector Performance Ultimate Injector design example 8 pC, 0.1 mm-mrad will be feasibly obtained. 500-kV DC gun, 3-D pulse shaping, and 10-MeV SCA. 80 pC, 0.1 mm-mrad will be obtained. 750-kV DC gun, 3-D pulse shaping, and 10-MeV SCA. R. Hajima et al. Compact ERL CDR (2008) I.V. Bazarov et al., PRST-AB (2005) 3 R. Hajima

  4. Integration of XFELO and ERL Beam dump ERL Gun FEL Gun Location Operation mode • straight section of the loop • additional branch • independent • concurrent From the ERL side, XFELO adds a new feature with minor modification ERL and XFELO provides complimentary X-rays Injector • share an ERL injector • use a FEL injector 4 R. Hajima

  5. Growth of emittance and energy spread in a loop E=5 GeV, r=25m, “half arc” = TBA x 15 coherent SR for 20pC/2ps tuning of cell-to-cell phase advance  negligible emittance growth incoherent SR FEL gain is preserved energy spread after FEL lasing Energy recovery is preserved 5 R. Hajima

  6. XFELO lasing at 5-GeV? 0.1nm XFELO with a 5-mm gap Halbach-type undulator 7 GeV, lw=1.88cm, gap=5mm, aw=1  l=0.1nm 5 GeV, lw=1.43cm, gap=5mm, aw=0.59  l=0.1nm assuming same peak current and same mode area, 1-D gain for 5 GeV beam is “0.65 x 1-D gain for 7 GeV” further gain reduction due to the emittance effect. R. Hajima 6

  7. XFELO with 5 and 7-GeV ERLs 0.3 1Å X-FELO analytical estimation of small-signal FEL gain 0.25 7 GeV 0.2 small-signal FEL gain 0.15 0.1 5 GeV 0.05 0 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 normalized emittance (mm-mrad) The above calculations are based on a Halbach-type undulator. DELTA undulator gives 1.4 times larger FEL gain. R. Hajima

  8. Velocity bunching in an ERL main linac Main Linac Injector SCA #1 SCA #3 SCA #2 Velocity bunching for a SASE-FEL injector Velocity bunching for an ERL light source Velocity bunching for an X-FELO (1) no additional component is required (2) only 2-3% SCAs are used for the velocity bunching (3) residual energy spread is smaller than magnetic compression (4) moderate emittance growth for low bunch charge L. Serafini and M. Ferrario, AIP-Porc. (2001) H. Iijima, R. Hajima, NIM-A557 (2006). R. Hajima, N. Nishimori, FEL-2009 R. Hajima

  9. Gain reduction by bandwidth mismatch K-J. Kim et al., PRL 100, 244802 (2008). growth rate of the m-th mode gain loss bandwidth mismatch cavity length detuning bandwidth of the Bragg mirrors = 12 meV 12 meV In the following calculations, we choose reflectivity and phase shift for a cavity round trip R. Hajima

  10. Example of the velocity bunching injector merger SCA #1 SCA #2 10 30 9 25 8 7 st 20 E 6 bunch length (ps) Energy (MeV) 5 15 4 10 3 velocity bunching 2 5 1 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 z (m) 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 PARMELA simulation bunch charge q = 7.7 pC velocity bunching bunching in 8 cavities injection 10.9 MeV, 1.3 ps, -85 deg. gradient Eacc = 8.5 MV/m 4 cavities 4 cavities emittance growth by chromatic aberration 2 ex sx 1.6 ey sy beam size (mm) 1.2 norm. emittance (mm-mrad) 0.8 0.4 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 10 R. Hajima z (m) z (m)

  11. Optimum design of the velocity bunching 1 ex 0.8 ey 0.6 0.4 norm. emittance (mm-mrad) 0.2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 z (m) injector merger SCA #1 SCA #2 bunch charge q = 7.7 pC velocity bunching bunching in 6 cav. + on-crest 2 cav. injection 10.9 MeV, 1.3 ps, -90 deg. gradient Eacc = 8.5 MV/m at the SCA#2 exit E = 27.7 MeV, st = 380 fs, sE = 250 keV ex = 0.16 mm-mrad, ey = 0.13 mm-mrad 10 30 9 25 8 st 7 20 E 6 Energy (MeV) bunch length (ps) 5 15 4 10 velocity bunching 3 2 5 1 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 z (m) 2 1.6 sx sy 1.2 beam size (mm) 0.8 0.4 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 11 R. Hajima z (m)

  12. Phase plot at the SCA #2 exit R. Hajima

  13. Enhancement of the FEL gain by velocity bunching 0.8 for 5-GeV, 1-Å X-FELO 0.7 0.6 with velocity bunching 7.7 pC, 0.38 ps, sE/E=5x10-5 0.5 small-signal FEL gain 0.4 0.3 0.2 without velocity bunching 20 pC, 2 ps, sE/E=10-4 0.1 0 0.25 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.15 normalized emittance (mm-mrad) Significant enhancement of the FEL gain by velocity bunching. Gain~40% is possible even with emittance growth during the bunching. R. Hajima

  14. saturation Simulation of XFELO (5 GeV with velocity bunching) After the saturation: pulse duration t=1.2 ps (FWHM) photons/pulse (intra cavity) Np = 2x1010 photons/pulse (extracted) Np = 7x108 R. Hajima

  15. ERL(HOM:6×2) TESLA(HOM:5×2) 2-Loop Design of 5-GeV ERL HOM-damped cavity high threshold current of HOM BBU allows 2-loop configuration. R. Hajima

  16. Possible Scheme for Combining ERL and XFELO • 5 GeV ERL for SR use : accelerate 2 times • 7.5 GeV recirculating linac for XFELO : accelerate 3 times Optional We can switch two operation modes by introducing an orbit bump having lrf/2= 11.5 cm. S. Sakanaka, talk at PF-ISAC (2010) R. Hajima

  17. Growth of emittance and e-spread for 3-pass 7.5-GeV 1st-loop: E=2.5 GeV, r=8.66m, 2x14-cell FODO 2nd-loop: E=5 GeV, r=25m, TBAx30-cell acceptable for FEL DsE/E = 2 x 10-5 17 R. Hajima

  18. Stability of SRF • Cornell LLRF System • Demonstrated: • Exceptional field stability at QL = 106 to 108 • Lorentz-force compensation and fast field ramp up • Piezo microphonics compensation with ~20 Hz bandwidth A/A< 2·10-5 P < 0.01 deg M. Liepe, ERL-09 energy stability << FEL gain band width This requirement is fulfilled by current LLRF technology. 18 R. Hajima

  19. Conclusions • Hard X-ray ERL can accommodate XFELO. • we can extend the frontier of X-ray beam parameters • 0.1nm-XFELO is feasibly realized at • 5-GeV ERL with velocity bunching • 7.5-GeV beam from a 2-loop 5-GeV ERL • an ERL injector is shared, no major modification is needed • XFELO can be installed either at a loop or a branch. • however, beam loss in a long narrow duct might be a problem for a XFELO in a loop • In the Japanese collaboration, XFELO is considered as a part of 5-GeV hard X-ray ERL. 19 R. Hajima

More Related