1 / 18

INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop

INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop. New Orleans, August, 2005. Agenda. Integrated Risk Management Overview Risk/Capability/Gap Formula & IRM Process Risks Capabilities Gaps Discussion. Integrated Risk Management (IRM).

astanfill
Download Presentation

INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENTDecision Maker Workshop

  2. New Orleans, August, 2005

  3. Agenda Integrated Risk Management Overview Risk/Capability/Gap Formula & IRM Process Risks Capabilities Gaps Discussion

  4. Integrated Risk Management (IRM) Taking a risk-based approach, assessing our capabilities, and identifying our gaps, is instrumental in our ability to shape the emergency management and homeland security strategic planning and policy-making process. Integrated Risk Management is a process to fuse, unify, and inform the Homeland Security Enterprise. You are all a strategic part of the Homeland Security Enterprise.

  5. “Silo-ed” Approach EMA Non- Profits NGOs Fire LE Citizens Federal State Decision Makers Private Sector CEOs Health

  6. Integrated Approach EMA Emergency Partners Fire LE Citizens State and Federal Partners Local Jurisdictions Federal State Health Decision Makers Non- Profits Private Sector CEOs NGOs

  7. Homeland Security Enterprise Local Emergency Partners State and Federal Partners Jurisdictional CEO’s EMA • Participation by Decision Makers in the Homeland Security Enterprise is key to fully realizing integrated risk management. Communication & Coordination • Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) is a “whole community” approach. • Utilizes partnerships among emergency management, law enforcement, public health, local/state/federal government, private sector, nongovernmental organizations, faith-based & community-based organizations, and the public. • Federal guidance focus is on all-hazards preparedness; local HSE partners must share info regardless of threat or hazard, man-made or natural. • Foundation of IRM is understanding the Risk  Capabilities  Gaps  Decision-Making process .

  8. Risk/Capability/GapFormula Decision Maker Education and Engagement Risk Risk Capabilities Capabilities Gaps Gaps Results Recommended Actions Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding Priorities Threat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) Core Capability Assessment Gap Analysis Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding Priorities Homeland Security Enterprise Decision Maker Review & Updates

  9. Integrated Risk Management Components Capability Assessment Gap Analysis Recommended Actions Risk Assessment Enhancement • Develop likely, worse-case scenarios • Identify risk factors • Weight risk factors • Score risks • Update Risk Assessment based on new methodology and scoring risks • Use Capability Assessment to identify Gaps • Prioritize to ensure the higher priority Gaps are accurately identified • Identify Solution Areas to determine ways to close the Gaps • Finalize with written Gap Analysis • Develop Gap Closures, i.e. actions to close identified gaps • Prioritize Gap Closures based on survey results and stakeholder input • Develop Recommended Actions from Gap Closures to present to Decision Makers • Identify priority Core Capabilities based on scenarios • Develop Capability Survey based on THIRA results • Assess Capability current levels with preparedness goals based on survey results

  10. Risk Process • Develop likely, worse-case scenarios • Identify risk factors • Weight risk factors • Score risks • Update Risk Assessment based on new methodology and scoring risks

  11. Risk Results

  12. Capability Process • Identify priority Core Capabilities based on scenarios • Develop Capability Assessment Survey based on the Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) • Assess Capability current levels with preparedness goals • Identify priority Capabilities based • on survey results

  13. Capability Assessment Results

  14. Gap Process • Use Capability Assessment to identify Gaps • Prioritize to ensure the higher priority Gaps are accurately identified • Identify Solution Areas to determine ways to close the Gaps • Finalize with written Gap Analysis

  15. Gap Analysis Results/ Recommended Actions

  16. Process Review Decision Maker Education and Engagement Risk Risk Capabilities Capabilities Gaps Gaps Results Recommended Actions Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding Priorities Franklin County Threat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) Franklin County Core Capability Assessment Franklin County Gap Analysis Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding Priorities Homeland Security Enterprise Decision Maker Review & Updates

  17. Nashville, May, 2010

  18. QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION

More Related