1 / 30

802.11 Nov 2009 Closing Plenary Motions

This document contains all the motions brought during the November 2009 closing plenary of the 802.11 group. It includes scheduling concerns, letter ballots, editorial work, and working group recirculation ballots.

athelma
Download Presentation

802.11 Nov 2009 Closing Plenary Motions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802.11 Nov 2009 Closing Plenary Motions Authors: Date: 2009-11-20 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  2. Abstract This document is a composite of all 802.11 sub-group motions that are for information, or may be brought at the November 2009 closing plenary. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  3. WG telecons Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  4. Teleconferences Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  5. TGmb Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  6. Scheduling is Hard! • Letter ballots should not close on major holidays • Significant vacation activity in December Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  7. Recap of TGmb Letter Ballot Debate • 15 days is not enough • ~ 700 comment resolutions, including several global style changes • 802.11w-2009 has been rolled in (~ 100 pages) • Significant editorial work before beginning ballot • ~ 200 comment resolutions approved at this meeting • Start date of ballot is not yet clear • Scheduling goals • End before January 2009 interim meeting • Avoid holidays and holiday vacations • TG proposed motion • Specified an end date so that early completion of editorial work led to more ballot time • Targeted at a 4-week ballot time • Motion revised at CAC to include a minimum ballot length Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  8. Motion – TGmb letter ballot Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D1.0,Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 2.0 incorporating these resolutions and, Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot to start as soon as possible, ending on Friday, January 8, 2010 asking the question "Should P802.11REVmb D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?" [ Informative Note: TGmb anticipates the start of the ballot period will be approximately December 11, leading to a 4-week ballot period. ] • Moved by Matthew Gast on behalf of TGmb • (TGmb motion: Moved by Adrian Stephens, seconded by Harry Worstell; result: 9 yes / 0 no / 0 abstain) • Moved: <name>, Seconded: <name>, Result: y-n-a] Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  9. Motion – TGmb letter ballot Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the first working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D1.0,Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 2.0 incorporating these resolutions and, Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot • to start as soon as possible • to last at least 20 days • ending, if possible, on Friday, January 8, 2010 asking the question "Should P802.11REVmb D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?" • Moved by Matthew Gast , Seconded Clint Chaplin • Result: 41,0,1, passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  10. TGs Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  11. Scheduling is Hard! • Letter ballots should not close on major holidays • Significant vacation activity in December Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  12. Motion: • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#147 on P802.11s Draft 3.0 as contained in document 11-09/471r23, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” • Moved by Theodorus Denteneer on behalf of TGs • TGs vote: • Moved: Guido Hiertz Seconded: Dan Harkins Result: y: 9-n: 0-a: 0 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  13. Motion: • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#147 on P802.11s Draft 3.0 as contained in document 11-09/471r23, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot of at least 15 days asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” • Moved by Theodorus Denteneer, seconded Dorothy Stanley • TGs vote: • Moved: Guido Hiertz Seconded: Dan Harkins Result: y: 9-n: 0-a: 0 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  14. Motion: • Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB#147 on P802.11s Draft 3.0 as contained in document 11-09/471r23, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a Working Group Recirculation Ballot of at least 15 days, with a target close date of Jan 8th 2010, asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” • Moved by Theodorus Denteneer, seconded Dorothy Stanley • Result: 41,0,2, passes • TGs vote: • Moved: Guido Hiertz Seconded: Dan Harkins Result: y: 9-n: 0-a: 0 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  15. TGaa Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  16. Motion-7 Move to approve document 09/926r5 as the guiding document describing the work that needs to be done in 802.11aa and 802.1Qat Moved: Ganesh Venkatesan on behalf of TGaa Passes without objection In TGaa: Moved: Alex Ashley Seconded: Graham Smith Vote: 6-0-3 Motion passes Slide 16 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  17. TVWS SG Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  18. Motion #1 • Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, • Request that the PAR and the Five Criteria contained in 11-09/934r8 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom. • Moved by Richard Kennedy • Seconded by Peter Ecclesine • Result: 43,0,3 passes • In the SG: • Moved by Peter Ecclesine, seconded by Carl Kain • Result: unanimous (19 members in the room) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  19. Motion #2 • Move to extend the TVWS SG to the end of the March plenary • Moved by: Richard Kennedy on behalf of the TVWS SG • Seconded by: Peter Ecclesine • Vote: 47,0,0, passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  20. JTC1 AHC Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  21. JTC1 ad hoc approved a liaison to SC6 relating to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123 • Motion • The IEEE 802.11 JTC1 ad hoc recommends to the IEEE 802.11 WG and IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in 11-09-1254r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter provides a response to some of the material liaised to the IEEE staff in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123. The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. It should also be CC’ed to the individuals and organisations addressed by the e-mail that notified IEEE staff about ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123. IEEE staff should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes • Moved: David Hunter • Seconded: Jerry Thrasher • Result 11/0/0 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  22. 802.11 WG will consider a liaison to SC6 relating to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123 • Motion • The IEEE 802.11 JTC1 ad hoc and IEEE 802.11 WG recommends to the IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in 11-09-1254r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter provides a response to some of the material liaised to the IEEE staff in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123. The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. It should also be CC’ed to the individuals and organisations addressed by the e-mail that notified IEEE staff about ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC6 N 14123. IEEE staff should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes • Moved: Andrew Myles • Seconded: Peter Ecclesine • Result: 42,0,1, passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  23. JTC1 ad hoc approved a liaison to SC6 relating to plans to use the PSDO • Motion • The IEEE 802.11 JTC1 ad hoc recommends to the IEEE 802.11 WG and IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in 11-09-1273r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter documents recent and planned future activities in the IEEE 802.11 Working Group, flags an intention to submit certain documents to ISO/IEC using the PDSO process, and offers JTC1 and SC6 National Bodies the opportunity to submit comments into the Sponsor Ballot process. The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. The IEEE 802.11 Working Group Chair should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes. • Moved: Dan Harkins • Seconded: Jim Raab • Result 12/0/0 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  24. 802.11 WG will consider a liaison to SC6 relating to plans to use the PSDO • Motion • The IEEE 802.11 JTC1 ad hoc and IEEE 802.11 WG recommends to IEEE 802 ExCom that the letter contained in 11-09-1273r1 be liaised to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6. This letter documents recent and planned future activities in the IEEE 802.11 Working Group, flags an intention to submit certain documents to ISO/IEC using the PDSO process, and offers JTC1 and SC6 National Bodies the opportunity to submit comments into the Sponsor Ballot process. The letter should be sent to the SC6 Secretariat. The IEEE 802.11 Working Group Chair should be authorised to make any necessary editorial changes. • Moved: Andrew Myles • Seconded: Ian Sherlock • Result: 41,0,1, passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  25. QoS MAN SG New Business Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  26. Motion to approve QOSMAN PAR comment resolutions Move to accept the QOSMAN PAR comment resolutions in document https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/09/11-09-1241-03-00qm-qosman-par-comment-resolutions.xls. • Moved: Michael Montemurro • Seconded: Jon Rosdahl • Vote: 41,0,1 passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  27. PAR and 5C Approval Believing that the QoSMAN PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, Request that the QoSMAN PAR and the Five Criteria contained in document 11-09-0942-08-00qm-qosman-par-nescom-form-plus-5cs.doc be forwarded to the 802.11 WG for approval of the full Working Group. • Moved: Michael Montemurro • Second: Jon Rosdahl • Vote: 43,0,1, passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  28. QoSMAN SG Extension Request the IEEE 802 LMSC to extend the 802.11 QoSMAN Study Group. Moved by: Michael Montemurro Second: Jon Rosdahl Vote: 39,0,1, passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  29. TTA Liaison Request Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  30. Proposed 802.11 Motion • The IEEE 802.11 Working Group requests that the 802 EC maintain a liaison with TTA in support of ANNEX B 'Technical Cooperation Agreement' of the TTA/IEEE-SA MOU conditional upon the MOU being signed. • Moved: Peter Ecclesine • Seconded: Michael Montemurro • Result: 39,0,1, passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

More Related