1 / 44

DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIGHTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES

1/44. LIGHTWEIGHT STRUCTURES in CIVIL ENGINEERING Warsaw-Cz ę stochowa, 3 December, 2004. DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIGHTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES. dr inż. Ryszard Walentyński Faculty of Civil Engineering Silesian University of Technology Gliwice, Poland. 2/44.

audra-hoffman
Download Presentation

DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIGHTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1/44 LIGHTWEIGHT STRUCTURES in CIVIL ENGINEERING Warsaw-Częstochowa, 3 December, 2004 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMEDLIGHTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES dr inż. Ryszard Walentyński Faculty of Civil Engineering Silesian University of Technology Gliwice, Poland

  2. 2/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński INTRODUCTION

  3. 3/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński INTRODUCTION

  4. 4/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński TECHNOLOGY

  5. 5/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński TECHNOLOGY

  6. 6/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński TECHNOLOGY

  7. 7/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński TECHNOLOGY

  8. 8/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński TECHNOLOGY

  9. 9/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński BARRACKS

  10. 10/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński ROOFS

  11. 11/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński ROOFS

  12. 12/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński ROOFS

  13. 13/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński INSULATION

  14. 14/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Economics (>25% cheaper to traditional sol.) • Column and lateral beam free • Savings on material • Savings on building site size • Savings on time • Easy construction • Staff training ADVANTAGES

  15. 15/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Economics (>25% cheaper to traditional sol.) • Column and lateral beam free • Savings on material • Savings on building site size • Savings on time • Easy construction • Staff training ADVANTAGES

  16. 16/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Economics (>25% cheaper to traditional sol.) • Column and lateral beam free • Savings on material • Savings on building site size • Savings on time • Easy construction • Staff training ADVANTAGES

  17. 17/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Economics (>25% cheaper to traditional sol.) • Column and lateral beam free • Savings on material • Savings on building site size • Savings on time • Easy construction • Staff training ADVANTAGES

  18. 18/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Economics (>25% cheaper to traditional sol.) • Column and lateral beam free • Savings on material • Savings on building site size • Savings on time • Easy construction • Staff training ADVANTAGES

  19. 19/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Economics (>25% cheaper to traditional sol.) • Column and lateral beam free • Savings on material • Savings on building site size • Savings on time • Easy construction • Staff training ADVANTAGES

  20. 2044 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Economics (>25% cheaper to traditional sol.) • Column and lateral beam free • Savings on material • Savings on building site size • Savings on time • Easy construction • Staff training ADVANTAGES

  21. 21/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Durability • Fragility • Thermal insulation • Fire resistance DISADVANTAGES

  22. 22/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Durability • Fragility • Thermal insulation • Fire resistance DISADVANTAGES

  23. 23/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Durability • Fragility • Thermal insulation • Fire resistance DISADVANTAGES

  24. 24/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Durability • Fragility • Thermal insulation • Fire resistance DISADVANTAGES

  25. 25/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński Taking into account ADVANTAGES and DISADVANTAGES Good solution for temporary structures REASONABLE APPLICATIONS

  26. 26/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Computer program COSMIC • written according to: • American materials • American conditions • American standards COMPUTER AID

  27. 27/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Computer program COSMIC • written according to: • American materials • American conditions • American standards COMPUTER AID

  28. 28/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Computer program COSMIC • written according to: • American materials • American conditions • American standards COMPUTER AID

  29. 29/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Computer program COSMIC • written according to: • American materials • American conditions • American standards COMPUTER AID

  30. 30/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński Polish wind code PN77/B-2011 ASCE standard GUST RESPONSE FACTOR

  31. 31/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński Initial cost estimation COSMIC APPLICATION

  32. 32/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Required data: • loads • material properties • geometric characteristic COMPUTATIONAL PROBLEMS

  33. 33/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Required data: • loads • material properties • geometric characteristic COMPUTATIONAL PROBLEMS

  34. 34/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Required data: • loads • material properties • geometric characteristic COMPUTATIONAL PROBLEMS

  35. 35/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Difficulties in estimation: • tension and bending stiffnesses • load bearing capacity COMPUTATIONAL PROBLEMS

  36. 36/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński Free supported statical scheme ASSESMENT OF PROFILE PROPERTIES

  37. 37/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński Free supported statical scheme ASSESMENT OF PROFILE PROPERTIES Ark scheme

  38. 38/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Maximum span (MIC240): • advertisement – up to 36 m • Author’s judgement – 20-24 m(depending on loads and ark arrow) OTHER DESIGN PROBLEMS

  39. 39/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • Maximum span (MIC240): • advertisement – up to 36 m • Author’s judgement – 20-24 m(depending on loads and ark arrow) OTHER DESIGN PROBLEMS

  40. 40/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • hesitations based on experience • lack of academic references • proposal of experiment • $$$ FINAL REMARKS AND FURTHER WORK

  41. 41/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • hesitations based on experience • lack of academic references • proposal of experiment • $$$ FINAL REMARKS AND FURTHER WORK

  42. 42/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • hesitations based on experience • lack of academic references • proposal of experiment • $$$ FINAL REMARKS AND FURTHER WORK

  43. 43/44 DESIGN PROBLEMS OF COLD FORMED LIFGTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES R. Walentyński • hesitations based on experience • lack of academic references • proposal of experiment • $$$ FINAL REMARKS AND FURTHER WORK

  44. 44/44 LIGHTWEIGHT STRUCTURES in CIVIL ENGINEERING Warsaw-Częstochowa, 3 December, 2004 Thank you for your kind attentionDESIGN PROBLEMSOF COLD FORMEDLIGHTWEIGHT ARK STRUCTURES Ryszard Walentyński rwal@kateko.bud.polsl.gliwice.pl

More Related