1 / 10

An Open, Safe Harbor

An Open, Safe Harbor. <1> The Idea <2> Discussion and Reaction. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License . Recent progress in OA suggests we are at a tipping point.

avak
Download Presentation

An Open, Safe Harbor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Open, Safe Harbor <1> The Idea <2> Discussion and Reaction This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.

  2. Recent progress in OA suggests we are at a tipping point

  3. Libraries need an OA strategy that will persuade and compel widespread Open Access adoption

  4. Commercial Publishers Oppose OA

  5. The Goal:Widespread OA Adoption

  6. The Idea: Establish an Open, Safe Harbor for Publishers who Participate in OA

  7. The Concept An initiative for deans/directors of academic/research libraries to make a public commitment: that for any publisher which agrees to put their journals in an open access platform no more than one year after the original date of publication, the library will “safe harbor” all journals from that publisher to which the library is subscribed at the time of the commitment for a specific period of time (five years).

  8. Why It Could Work • Safe harboring by libraries of serials is a known practice • Saving is easier than cancelling • Scalable and not discipline-specific • No dollar costs to the Library • Non-cancellation is valuable to publishers (especially now) • Enables leveraging

  9. Why It Could Fail • Requires some organization and critical mass • Publishers may just ignore it • A forever commitment for a five-year pledge • Five years is too long; five years is too short • A one-year embargo is too long; a one-year embargo is too short • Does not address pricing issues • Is it legal? • Pricing during the safe harbor period

  10. Over To You:Some Initial Questions • Vulnerabilities I have missed? • Is it practical – would your library sign on? • What would improve the proposal? • What’s the likelihood of success? This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.

More Related