350 likes | 523 Views
Design and Launch of a Balloon Re-entry Vehicle for Free Fall Experimentation. Introductions. Introduction. High altitude airborne developments have presented huge advantages in the US military’s arsenal through: environmental monitoring precision navigation Communication missile warning
E N D
Design and Launch of a Balloon Re-entry Vehicle for Free Fall Experimentation
Introduction • High altitude airborne developments have presented huge advantages in the US military’s arsenal through: • environmental monitoring • precision navigation • Communication • missile warning • intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) platforms. • However conventional aircraft have a practical upper altitude limit (60000-80000 ft above the sea level) where engine efficiency greatly diminishes. • High-altitude maneuvering lighter-than-air platforms use the principle of buoyancy. These mechanisms became potential platforms for: • ISR, precision navigation • environmental monitoring • communication relays • missile warning, and weapon delivery.
Introduction Cont. • In 2005, the Wright State University High Altitude Balloon Team began its first development of high altitude mechanisms while being funded by the Ohio Space Grant Consortium. • The team, including students, staff and recent graduates, since then has had over 17 successful launches and recoveries over 100,000 feet while being funded by the National Science Foundation. • During these launches, experiments have been conducted containing: • temperature sensors • Cameras • video transmitters/recorders • actuation devices.
Ballute • “Ballute aerodynamic decelerators have been studied since early in space age (1960’s), being proposed for aerocapture in the early 1980’s” (Braun). • The Goodyear Aerospace Corporation coined the term “ballute” (a contraction of “balloon” and “parachute” which the original ballute closely resembles) for their cone balloon decelerator in 1962.
Objective Martian atmospheric entry vehicle for NASA Image: Andrews Space, INC
Design Parameters • Design parameters include but are not limited to: • A maximum weight per payload of six pounds, total of two payloads (per FAA regulations) • An altitude parachute deployment of 65,000 feet • Design of parachute to withstand a drag of 125 mph • GPS, Beacon, and APRS needed to relocate upon re-entry • Accelerometer used to record data on free-fall characteristics • All components function in a low pressure low temperature environment (1 KPa and -70 degrees Celsius
19 Mile High Club Presentation … 21 Miles ?
Design Considerations - Structural • Light • Stable • Strong • Impact Absorbent • Modular • Aerodynamic
Design Considerations – Structural • Proper Material Selection • Wood • Foam • Carbon Fiber • Proper Shape • Aerodynamic • Smooth All constraints are very related
Design Considerations - Electrical • Tracking • Command • Data Acquisition
Design Considerations – ElectricalTracking Testing • Automatic Packet Reporting System (APRS)
Final Design • Modular • Tough • Within Specs
Launch 019 • Bullute launched on May 5th from Wright State Lake Campus • Flight Prediction showed a landing near Marysville, OH
Results - Electrical • Communication Failure • Possible Reasons • Radio • Antenna Failure • Radio Battery Case Failure
Results - Electrical • Communication Failure • Possible Reasons • GPS Failure
Results - Electrical • Communication Failure • Possible Reasons • Battery Failure
Electrical Load Anaylsis • Performed to determine if batteries died during flight • Calculated total power consumption of all devices • Used V=IR to find current draw on battery pack • Hours battery could operate = Amp hour rating of battery divided by current draw on battery
Electrical Load Anaylsis • Reduced calculated run time by 50% • Accounts for cold operating environment • Main battery pack should have lasted 12.64 hours • Radio battery pack should have lasted 5-6 hours • Batteries likely did not die
Results - Flight • Flight Predictions
Results - Flight • Balloon Performance • Ascent Rate • 562.13 ft/min. • Slower than Ideal • Max Alt. • 111,302 ft • School Altitude Record!
Results - Flight • Destination Possibilities • Flooded Field • Lake (most likely)
Conclusions • Mechanical • Working Modular Design • Electrical • Communication Breakdown • Flight • 111,302 ft • Splashdown! • Most Reasonable Result
Acknoledgements • Thanks to Bruce Rahn • Thanks to our pilot & launch advisor Nick Baines • Thanks to Mark Spoltman & Josh Horn of Hartzell Propeller • Thanks to Eleanor Mantzfor sewing the parachute
Sponsors • The Ohio Space Grant Consortium • Wright State University Curriculum Development Grant • The National Science Foundation