1 / 14

September 2012 –Partners Meeting Introduction

September 2012 –Partners Meeting Introduction. Managing workforce change: Strengthening public services social dialogue in an era of austerity . Actions (1/02/12 – 28/02/13). Meeting with EU representatives (Feb 2012) National stakeholder meetings (Summer 2012) - Country case studies

bailey
Download Presentation

September 2012 –Partners Meeting Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. September 2012 –Partners Meeting Introduction Managing workforce change: Strengthening public services social dialogue in an era of austerity

  2. Actions (1/02/12 – 28/02/13) • Meeting with EU representatives (Feb 2012) • National stakeholder meetings (Summer 2012)- Country case studies • National reports (September 2012) • Comparative Report (Draft: December 2012) • Conference: Friday 22nd Feb 2013 (Friday 1st Feb 2013) • Final Reporting: February 2013

  3. Objectives of the Day • Present/discuss draft national reports: - revising national reports - engagement with questions/model • Comparative national report • Conference – timing/approach/attendance • Longer term issues: - publications - conference participation- future research plans

  4. Research Questions • Examine changes in employment, terms and conditions, patterns of work organisation since 2008/9 • How have austerity measures been designed and implemented? • How have different national/sectoral institutions of involvement influenced the process and outcomes of austerity? • Initial Propositions: A) stronger institutions = more acceptable IR change B) austerity overwhelms scope for consensual change

  5. Framework to analyse austerity measures and the role of social dialogue Social Dialogue Legal rules & bargaining structures Budgets Politics Technology Pay freeze/job loss/service redesign Drivers of Austerity Austerity Measures outcomes Economic Social Political Voice Political and economic characteristics size/scope of public services Source: adapted from Dornelas et al 2011

  6. Initial Findings Austerity • The crisis ‘austerity’ as a driver of change? - in some cases, but strong caveats ... timelags- reinforcement of previous reforms • Variation between countries:- severity of deficit/debt- political ideology- legacy of earlier reforms – appetite/need for reform • Other drivers: - demography - technology?

  7. Measures • Wage freezes: - freeze of pay scales • Wage cuts: - targeted at higher earners (not CZ)- pension reforms • Employment reductions:- via non-replacement ratios – attrition (FR/IT)- redundancies/severance (UK) • Work organisation:- temporary employment

  8. Social Dialogue National Level • Little input from employers/unions in formulation - legitimacy: direct public appeals/fiscal rules • Hollowing out of national industrial relations?- legislative/budgetary instruments dominate - wage freezes/cuts severely limit ‘bargaining’- shift towards single-employer level • Sectoral level – generally similar trends?

  9. Social Dialogue Employer level LG • Central control exercised via financial envelopes • Scope for employer choice:- severity of cuts - role of differing institutional rules- union approach cooperative/confrontational- type of services provided • Employer policy:- performance management, outsourcing productivity deals

  10. Outcomes • Wage moderation and reductions • Employment reductions • Social dialogue is weak at national level - more of a role at LG level – ritual? • Mobilisation:- stronger in FR, UK (less dialogue)...limited results • unintended consequences – morale, staff shortages

  11. Conclusions 1 • Austerity: a factor of many • Social dialogue: a return to unilateralism? - LG Employer level – concession bargaining/imposition • Actors: - Unions – weakened & being delegitimised? - Employers - tougher stance

  12. Conclusions 2 • Variations between countries: - severity of pressure/cuts (FR/IT, NL); govt ideology (Fr/UK) - within local government as well as between countries • Quantitative: break with past – cuts • Qualitative: reforms more path dependent

More Related