1 / 21

Understanding BRAC 2005 Military-Related Economic Development

2. Outline. Process UpdateRegional BRAC Recommendations

becca
Download Presentation

Understanding BRAC 2005 Military-Related Economic Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Understanding BRAC 2005 & Military-Related Economic Development August 17, 2005

    2. 2 Outline Process Update Regional BRAC Recommendations & Impact Military Related Economic Development

    3. 3 BRAC 2005 Objectives Rationalize Infrastructure with Defense Strategy Realign – The Future Force is “Joint” Revitalize Secretary Rumsfeld laid out his objectives over a year ago. The 3 “R’s” are Rationalize, Realign and Revitalize. We need to position our installation infrastructure to better support future Defense Strategy. The Cold War is over; we are more expeditionary and Joint. We plan to fight Joint, support Joint, and train Joint. Therefore we must also station Joint. Finally a big part of the effort will require investment in new facilities on gaining installations. This is an opportunity to revitalize some of the infrastructure. Remember the focus is on capacity – not on the number of installations. We’re not talking about going from 425 major installations to 305. We’re talking labor hour reductions at depots, test hours and acreage at ranges, work years at laboratories, acute care occupancy rates at hospitals, available airfield operations and ramp space at airfields etc. For T&E we need to retain at least one of each type of topography and climatology. Secretary Rumsfeld laid out his objectives over a year ago. The 3 “R’s” are Rationalize, Realign and Revitalize. We need to position our installation infrastructure to better support future Defense Strategy. The Cold War is over; we are more expeditionary and Joint. We plan to fight Joint, support Joint, and train Joint. Therefore we must also station Joint. Finally a big part of the effort will require investment in new facilities on gaining installations. This is an opportunity to revitalize some of the infrastructure. Remember the focus is on capacity – not on the number of installations. We’re not talking about going from 425 major installations to 305. We’re talking labor hour reductions at depots, test hours and acreage at ranges, work years at laboratories, acute care occupancy rates at hospitals, available airfield operations and ramp space at airfields etc. For T&E we need to retain at least one of each type of topography and climatology.

    4. 4 BRAC 2005 Timeline As I said in the introduction, we are already well along in the process. DoD published the draft evaluation criteria in the Federal Register on 23 December 2003 and must allow a 30 day public comment period. By law, the final criteria must be established by 16 February 2004. Along with the FY2005 budget submission, DoD will forward to Congress a number of documents that will serve as a basis for the 2005 BRAC analyses. These include a threat analysis; detailed force structure plan, an inventory of current infrastructure, and a SecDef certification that annual net savings can be achieved through BRAC. DoD and the Services will then take the rest of 2004 and the first half of FY 2005 to gather their data, analyze their infrastructure, and develop and coordinate their lists. In the past the Army pretty much did their thing, the Navy did theirs, the Air Force theirs, and DoD theirs and at the end, collected the disparate products and submitted them together. There really was four different BRAC processes. This time around, there still is likely to be differences between the Services processes, but coordination will be a much bigger and likely more difficult task because DoD is forcing the “Joint” issue.As I said in the introduction, we are already well along in the process. DoD published the draft evaluation criteria in the Federal Register on 23 December 2003 and must allow a 30 day public comment period. By law, the final criteria must be established by 16 February 2004. Along with the FY2005 budget submission, DoD will forward to Congress a number of documents that will serve as a basis for the 2005 BRAC analyses. These include a threat analysis; detailed force structure plan, an inventory of current infrastructure, and a SecDef certification that annual net savings can be achieved through BRAC. DoD and the Services will then take the rest of 2004 and the first half of FY 2005 to gather their data, analyze their infrastructure, and develop and coordinate their lists. In the past the Army pretty much did their thing, the Navy did theirs, the Air Force theirs, and DoD theirs and at the end, collected the disparate products and submitted them together. There really was four different BRAC processes. This time around, there still is likely to be differences between the Services processes, but coordination will be a much bigger and likely more difficult task because DoD is forcing the “Joint” issue.

    5. 5 Regional Hearings 17 Regional Hearings 15 June – Fairbanks, AK 17 June – Portland, OR 20 June – St Louis, MO 21 June – Rapid City, SD 23 June – Grand Forks, ND 24 June – Clovis, NM 27 June – Buffalo, NY 28 June – Charlotte, NC 30 June – Atlanta, GA 6 July – Boston, MA 7 July – Washington, DC 7 July – Arlington, VA 8 July – Baltimore, MD 11 July – San Antonio, TX 12 July – New Orleans, LA 14 July – Los Angeles, CA

    6. 6 Recent Actions 1 July 2005 GAO Report Issued Generally Supportive of BRAC Recommendations Skeptical Regarding Savings Commission Letter to DoD Requests Explanations for Not Closing: MCRD San Diego NS Pearl Harbor NAS Brunswick Navy Broadway Complex – San Diego Galena FOB, AK Pope AFB, NC Grand Forks AFB, ND Requests Explanations for Other Issues: Realignment of Navy Master Jet Base (NAS Oceana; Moody AFB; Cannon AFB Air National Guard Consultations Defense Finance & Accounting Service Closures Professional Development Education Joint Medical Command Headquarters

    7. 7 Recent Actions (Con’t) 18 July -- Open Hearing (Washington, DC) DoD Testimony 19 July -- Open Hearing (Washington, DC) Vote on Additions to the List for Consideration NAS Brunswick Broadway Complex – San Diego NAS Oceana Pope AFB Galena FOB DFAS Buckley Annex, CO; Columbus, OH; Indianapolis, IN Professional Development Education Naval Post Graduate School, Monterey, CA Defense Language Institute Monterey, CA Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB, OH

    8. 8 Recent Actions (Con’t) Joint Medical Command Bureau of Navy Medicine Potomac Annex, DC Air Force Medical Command Bolling AFB, DC TRICARE Management Activity, Leased Space Offices of the Surgeons General – Military Departments, Leased Space Office of the Secretary of Defense, Health Affairs, Leased Space MCRD San Diego NSY Pearl Harbor Moody AFB Grand Forks AFB

    9. 9 Recent Actions – Site Visits 26 July – 8 August -- Additional Site Visits 26 Jul – Hawthorne, NV / NSY Portsmouth / NAS Brunswick 27 Jul – Red River AD / NSB New London 28 Jul – Joint Medical (Washington, DC, Virginia, Maryland) 29 Jul – Detroit Arsenal / Battlecreek / Kellogg AGS / Galena FOL 1 Aug – Sheppard AFB / NAS Oceana 2 Aug – Pope AFB / DFAS Columbus / PDE-AFIT Ohio 3 Aug – DFAS Indianapolis / Anniston AD 4 Aug – DFAS Buckley Annex 5 Aug – Broadway Complex San Diego, CA 8 Aug – Monterey, CA

    10. 10 Recent Actions - Hearings 22 July – 27 August – Additional Hearings 22 Jul – New Orleans, LA (LA, MS, FL) 4 Aug – Washington, DC (VA) 8 Aug -- Monterey, CA (AK, CA, CO) 10 Aug – Washington, DC (IN, ME, NC, OH, VA, DC) 11 Aug – Washington, DC (Environmental Stewardship / Homeland Security / Air National Guard) 20 Aug – NAS Oceana Alternatives (Cecil Field, FL) 24 Aug – Crystal City, VA (Open Deliberative Meeting) 25 Aug – Crystal City, VA (Open Deliberative Meeting) 26 Aug – Crystal City, VA (Open Deliberative Meeting) 27 Aug – Crystal City, VA (Open Deliberative Meeting)

    11. 11 Actions Next Up 20 August – Special Hearing for NAS Oceana Alternatives 24 -27 August – Open Deliberative Hearings in Crystal City, VA 29 August – 7 September -- Final Deliberations / Report Preparation Thursday, 8 September – Recommendations to the President If Returned: Final Recommendations to President by Thursday, 20 October Friday, 23 September – Decisions to Congress If Returned: Final Decisions to Congress by Monday, 7 November Congress has 45 Legislative Days to Pass a Joint Resolution to Reject the List in its Entirety or it Becomes Law and the Decisions Proceed to Implementation Joint Resolution is Subject to Presidential Veto

    12. 12 BRAC Funding $13,520B Budgeted for BRAC 2005 in FY2006 Pres Bud Request FY07 Budget Build: ~$20B Real Cost: Some Projections > $40B

    13. 13 Major Army Milestones

    14. 14 Things to Keep an Eye On Congress Still Has the Power to Make Changes to the Process Influence Over Execution of Recommendations Through Appropriations Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) Linked to BRAC Some Priorities May Change Force Structure Could Change Overseas Basing Commission Expressed Concerns About the Pace of Return From Overseas Budget BRAC Costs Are Likely to Exceed Estimates There Will Be Competing Priorities Over Six Years A New Administration Will Oversee Most of the Actual Execution US National Security Strategy A Lot Can Change in Six Years!

    15. 15 Recommendations Fort Bliss Departing to Ft Sill: Air Defense Center & School 6th ADA Bde 31st ADA Bde Arriving from Fort Hood: 1 BCT (Heavy) Aviation Units Arriving from Fort Sill: 1 Fires Bde Arriving from Germany: HQ, 1st Armored Division 3 BCT (Heavy) Echelon Above Division Units Arriving from Korea: Echelon Above Division Units

    16. 16 Recommendations Major Concerns Housing Schools 19,891 net gain for the region19,891 net gain for the region

    17. 17 Recommendations White Sands Missile Range Departing Army Research Lab

    18. 18 Recommendations Holloman Air Force Base Disestablishing High Onset Gravitational Force Centrifuge Departing Physiological Training Unit

    19. 19 Keys to Keeping the Franchise Maintain an Environment Conducive to Continued Military Presence Greatest Asset is Unrestricted Mud-to-Space Maneuver Area & Climate Suppress Encroachment Prevent Incompatible Property Uses Guard Against Electromagnetic Spectrum Issues Preserve the Environment Maintain & Protect Expeditionary Assets & Facilities Stay Cost Competitive Minimize Local Cost of Living Minimize Installation Operational Costs Nurture Positive Impacts Maintain Safe, Healthy Neighborhoods Foster Affordable Quality Housing Maintain Great Schools for Everyone Provide Recreational & Cultural Opportunities Provide Employment Opportunities for Family Members

    20. 20 Army Goals Readiness World-Class Training Personal Small Unit Collective Live Fire Well Maintained Equipment Fully Mission Capable Up to Date Exercised Often Stability Personal & Family Housing, Schools, Social Support Network, Professional Experience, Advancement Opportunities

    21. 21 The Military “M’s” Missions Joint Combat Operations Traditional Non-Traditional Homeland Defense Air & Missile Defense Support to Civil Agencies Training Unit Live Fire Sergeants Major Academy Air & Missile Defense Ctr & School? Test Developmental Testing Operational Testing Maneuver Ground, Air, & Space Ranges Joint National Training Capability Training Technology

    22. 22 Levers for Continued Military Success Education Primary & Secondary Schooling Vocational Post-Secondary (esp. Engineers) Leadership Health Lifestyle Family Care Border Health Graduate Medical Education Transportation Rail Air Road

More Related