1 / 6

W/Z Planning - 2010

W/Z Planning - 2010. Monte Carlo samples 7 TeV – W, Z, top, QCD, EW (tau+DY) .. [ Ping and Wayne State ] Trigger – L1 and HLT. Good runs. Lumi segments. HLT -> PD set. [ Tata, Fan ] Data processing and samples – PD, SD and W/Z EW skim, [Efe – 2009 data ]

becka
Download Presentation

W/Z Planning - 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. W/Z Planning - 2010 • Monte Carlo samples 7 TeV – W, Z, top, QCD, EW (tau+DY) .. [ Ping and Wayne State ] • Trigger – L1 and HLT. Good runs. Lumi segments. HLT -> PD set. [ Tata, Fan ] • Data processing and samples – PD, SD and W/Z EW skim, [Efe – 2009 data ] • First data samples – skim muon candidates – QCD isolation study,…. Follow T&P for psi and upsilon. [Ping and Fan, PKU on psi polariz ] • We are interested in data processing/reducing in this context. There probably is a similar effort within the EW group. We must coordinate with them. I suppose TTU can do that. Our ultimate focus is Z asymmetry. • Muon reco – using Z T&P tools for eff, charge mis-id etc. [ Pooja ] • MET reco – evaluate different algos in data (jets ?). MET in Z events? Remove 1 muon ? [ Tata ]

  2. W/Z planning - II • QCD bkgnd [ Pooja ] • First data look at – some soft muons from b pairs and decays in flight. • Isolation variables – which to choose • Tools – template and ABCD, crosscheck • Systematics • EWK bkgnd [ Rochester ] • Monte Carlo for tau and DY – several MC to evaluate systematics • Data driven? In DY shrink |y| coverage and extrapolate – systematics. Check on U. Minn use of HF in ee

  3. W/Z Planning - III • PDF [ Lenny , Tata] • Establish 2 or more PDF, CTEQ, MRS … • Establish the “errors” on a given PDF set – e.g. the 40 CTEQ sets. • Check the tools supplied by the EW group – e.g. PDF systematics. (Renata) • Monte Carlo [ Ping, Tata , Roch ] • For W and Z aysm we need to use MC to compare to the data • RESBOS + FEWZ ? – NLO, NNLO • Draft papers – doing this exercise will indicate all the steps that need to be covered. Start with CDF/D0 as templates. [ Lenny – W, Arie – Z asym]

  4. W/Z Planning - IV • Make sure to speak at EW mu meetings • Submit the draft papers to EW mu group • Write up the AFB note in full detail [ Rochester + Renata] • Closure for 2-> 2 no ISR or FSR ( done – Dec. 2009 ) • Cuts to limit ISR (jet veto) and FSR ( Z Pt and gamma veto) • Unfolding for FSR and mass resolution • Final residual Monte Carlo correction – sets systematic errors, driven by PDF.

  5. W/Z Planning - V • Do W asym and AFB all together – sets base of SM rediscovery expertise. • Then branch out into W CI [FNAL – Fan, Ting. Lenny], DY CI [FNAL, Wayne State] and Z’ in AFB [Roch, CBPF, FNAL] • Groups should sign onto both common tasks and specific tasks • Rutgers [ e W asym, 1 PD ?] • FNAL [ 3 FNAL PD + 2 Guest PD - W, Z asym] • Rochester [ 2 PD ] • TATA [ 1 GS ] • Wayne State [ 1 PD, 1 GS ] • Purdue ? Is there a follow on after psi/upsilon ? • Texas Tech [ 1 PD + 1 GS + with time additional manpower] • Beijing ? PKU? [ 1 Guest GS ]

  6. LHC – 2010 Run, We must be Prepared !

More Related