1 / 6

Conclusions Stockholm workshop 24.09.2009

Conclusions Stockholm workshop 24.09.2009. GRI NW Investment I1- Virtual Test/Business Simulation (“recorded and agreed at the workshop”). Contents. Conclusion - Main direction of policy advise (Other) remarks and decisions Core and reference group reform Planning.

benoit
Download Presentation

Conclusions Stockholm workshop 24.09.2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ConclusionsStockholm workshop24.09.2009 GRI NW Investment I1- Virtual Test/Business Simulation (“recorded and agreed at the workshop”)

  2. Contents • Conclusion - Main direction of policy advise • (Other) remarks and decisions • Core and reference group reform • Planning

  3. Main direction - conclusion • Projects differ (large projects require a very secure process, eg nord stream related flows in EU), • Large investment will happen because of ’nimby’ only once in 5 to 15 years. • This VT hellps even more with incremental investments; adress quick and long term wins • Clarity on tariff derivation • Periodical, centralized´, competitive bidding processes for regional demand • Insight in aggregated shipper demand (as part of investment trigger) • Improve risk sharing mechanisms at regional level via 3-fold approach: • Financial solutions (like eg described in Journal of findings) • Commitment • Shippers • Neighbouring tso’s and regulators and governments • In some rare cases, EU fund support • Qualitative arguments to support investment (studies) • SOS (security of supply) • Competition • View on readyness to take risk (market growth, flow views)

  4. Remarks and decisions • No round 3, unless policy advise requires it • 16 october decision by core group, based on core and reference group remarks • describe in JOF the caveats of round 2 • investment triggers will not become more transparent as they are • Significant lessons emerged, JOF and Manual are at large supported • Subject to discussed in workshop • National systems, need to especially improve nra-cooperation in the area of agreeing on common investment trigger in relation to integrated open seasons • Fuel price volatility - a point of attention (at high loadfactor of regional transit lines it can be up to 30% of transport price)

  5. Core group formed, reference group same Core group • Old group minus Ariane Kruijtzer (EK/NMa), Martijn van Gemert (EnergieNed/Nuon). • New members: EGT, WGT, GUD, BNetzA. Reference group • No changes.

  6. Planning • 29 September RCC/IG updates • Friday 2 october telco • 16 october model final and frozen • By 16 october first draft policy paper discussed and decided if round 3 to take place • Last week October round 3, if any • 12 november PB update presentation • November: finalize policy advise • 26 November policy advise presented to gov, etc • December; advise sent to relevant policy makers, signed by executive representatives of stakeholders (eg PB’members)

More Related