350 likes | 607 Views
Introduction. Jack Poole, P.E. - Fire Protection EngineerGraduate from Univ. of Md., BS in FPEPoole Fire Protection
E N D
1. Welcome to the 2009 Farenhyt Distributor Conference Audio / Mass Notification Developments
Jack Poole, PE
Principal
Poole Fire Protection
3. Topics to be Covered Changes in the FP Industry
Changes in the Fire Alarm Industry
Summary of NFPA 72 – 2010 Edition Changes
Understanding Mass Notification
Why Intelligibility?
4. Why the Paradigm? September 11, 2001 was a major Driver
Forced Fire Departments to rethink the way the operate and respond to incidents
Re-evaluation by Owners and Designers of how to make buildings safer in the event of terror attack
Being more prepared for the emergency event
NFPA 1600, Disaster/Emergency Management
Plans for Evacuation & Continuity of Operations
Adequate Communication Capabilities
5. NFPA 72 – 2010 Edition Please acknowledge that the NFPA 72 changes were voted on and approved at the June 8 – 11, 2009 NFPA meeting in Chicago. Final printed copy is available from NFPA.
6. Fire Alarm Industry Changes Significant Changes to NFPA 72 - Now Called National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code
More than just fire hazards - weather, terrorist, chemical alerts & warnings
Major Changes in format and addition of 3 new chapters (from 11 chapter to 29 chapters – 15 not used)
Circuits and Pathways
Emergency Control Functions & Interfaces
Emergency Communications Systems (ECS)
7. Why the change? NFPA 72 now covers many issues in addition to Fire Alarm Systems.
Combination Systems
Video Imaging Detection
Carbon Monoxide Detection
Supervisory Service of Sprinkler Control Valves
Water Level Supervisory – 5.15.3
Water Temperature Supervisory – 5.15.4
Room Temperature Supervisory – 5.15.5
Fire Extinguisher Monitoring – 6.8.4.11
8. NFPA 72, 2010 Chapter Re-Organization 2007 edition had 11 Chapters
2010 edition will have 29 Chapters
Administrative Chapters
Support Chapters
System Chapters
Usability Chapters
9. NFPA 72 Chapters – Currently in 2007 Chapters 1 – 4 Administration, Definitions & Fundamentals
Chapter 5 – Initiating Devices
Chapter 6 – Protected Premises Fire Alarm Systems
Chapter 7 – Notification Appliances
Chapter 8 – Supervising Stations
Chapter 9 – Public Fire Alarm Reporting Systems
Chapter 10 – Inspection, Testing & Maintenance
Chapter 11 – Single & Multiple Station Alarms Household Systems
10. Administrative Chapters Chapter 1 Administration – 2007 Existing
Chapter 2 Referenced Publications – 2007 Existing
Chapter 3 Definitions – 2007 Existing
Chapter 4 Reserved
Chapter 5 Reserved
Chapter 6 Reserved
Chapter 7 Reserved
Chapter 8 Reserved
Chapter 9 Reserved
11. Support Chapters Chapter 10 Fundamentals – 2007 Chapter 4
Chapter 11 Reserved
Chapter 12 Circuits and Pathways – New
Chapter 13 Reserved
Chapter 14 Insp, Test & Maint. – 2007 Chapter 10
Chapter 15 Reserved
Chapter 16 Reserved
Chapter 17 Initiating Devices – 2007 Chapter 5
Chapter 18 Notification Appliances – 2007 Chapter 7
Chapter 19 Reserved
12. Systems Chapters Chapter 20 Reserved
Chapter 21 Emergency Control Functions – New
Chapter 22 Reserved
Chapter 23 Protected Premises Fire Alarm Systems – 2007 Chapter 6
Chapter 24 Emergency Communications Systems – 2010 originally proposed as Chapter 12
Chapter 25 Reserved
13. Systems Chapters Chapter 26 Supervising Station Alarm Systems – 2007 Chapter 8
Chapter 27 Public Emergency Alarm Reporting Systems – 2007 Chapter 9
Chapter 28 Reserved
Chapter 29 Single- and Multiple-Station Alarms and Household Fire Alarm Systems – 2007 Chapter 11
14. Usability Annex A Explanatory Material
Annex B Engineering Guide for Automatic Fire Detection
Annex C System Performance Design Guide
Annex D Speech Intelligibility
Annex E NEMA SB 30
Annex F Sample Ordinance for Adopting NFPA 72
Annex G Informational References
Annex H Cross References
15. Emergency Communication Systems – Chapter 24 Current NFPA 72 Annex E, Mass Notification Systems Replaced by Chapter 24 Emergency Communications Systems
Content from Chapter 6, Protected Premises Fire Alarm Systems
Emergency Voice Alarm Communications
Two-Way Communication Service
Chapter 24 will be a complete set of requirements for emergency communications systems – including requirements from other chapters by reference.
16. Chapter 24 - ECS 24.1 Introduction
Emergency Communications Systems (ECS) shall consist of two classifications of systems, one-way and two-way.
24.2 One-Way Emergency Communications Systems
24.2.1 In-Building Emergency Voice/Alarm Communications Systems
24.2.1.1* Section 24.2.1 shall be used in the design and application of emergency voice/alarm communications for fire alarm systems.
17. Chapter 24 - ECS 24.2.1.8 Priority.
24.2.1.8.1 When the fire alarm system has been activated, and mass notification has been given priority, an audible and visible indication shall be provided at the building fire alarm control unit.
24.2.1.8.2 The fire alarm system shall not automatically override emergency mass notification messages.
24.2.1.11* Relocation and Partial Evacuation. The requirements of 24.2.1.11 shall apply only to systems used for relocation or partial evacuation.
18. One-Way ECS In-Building EVACs Relocation of section 6.9 and other requirements
Survivability requirements to reference new chapter
Permits a mass notification control unit to take control of fire alarm notification appliances including amplifiers, speakers, and strobes
Will require a tone or voice message any time the priority is granted to the mass notification control unit
Strobes used for dual purposes shall not be marked ‘FIRE’, strobes to be blank or ‘ALERT’
19. One-Way ECS In-Building MNS Operation of MNS system is based on the emergency response plan
Intelligibility of voice messages are required to meet the requirements of Chapter 7 (notification)
Visual notification to be completed through strobes, textual, graphic or video displays
Re-labeling of existing strobes labeled fire is required to be completed in a manufacturers approved method
20. One-Way ECS Wide Area MNS High powered speaker arrays (HPSA) for large outdoor areas
Mounted at heights to prevent hearing damage to nearby persons
Are not permitted to provide mass notification to occupants inside structures or buildings
21. Changes to Notification Chapter Significant Changes to Chapter 18 (the old Chapter 7) of NFPA 72
Voice Intelligibility Designed and Measured in accordance with ISO 7240-19
Minimum indoor Intelligibility Values
AHJ has authority to change minimum values
22. Understanding Mass Notification A Mass Notification System (MNS) is a system designed to provide “real time” instructions and information to a large number of people spread out over a large complex, campus or multi-building facility in the event of an emergency.
May use inteIIigible voice communications, visible signals, text, graphics, tactile or other communications methods.
Purpose is to initiate evacuation, relocation, or to provide information on fire, weather, terrorist events, biological, chemical or nuclear emergencies to occupants.
A MNS is also an Emergency Management Tool designed to assist emergency responders to deal with real time conditions during an emergency.
23. Who needs it or is using it?
College campuses
Universities
Military bases
Corporate campuses
Large manufacturing facilities
24. What Drives it? NFPA 72 – Chapter 24 (2010)
The military market is governed by the Unified Facilities Criteria 4-021-01.
This UFC Document dictates the design, operation and interfaces required for MNS Systems on Military Bases.
The UFC Document also sets forth performance standards such as Intelligibility.
25. UFC 4-021-01 Requirements Special messaging
Local Operators Console (LOC)
Special visual signaling
Audio intelligibility
Integration to Base-Wide Systems
Digital message signs
26. Special Messaging The Unified Facilities Criteria requires up to eight (8) specific messages to meet various emergencies such as:
Fire
Severe Weather Alert
Hazardous Material Alert
Force Protection Threat
Security Breach
Bomb Threat
Natural Disaster Alert
All Clear
27. Local Operators Console The UFC requires the use of Local Operators Consoles in the facilities to allow authorized occupants to initiate messages and perform “live” paging to meet the specific emergencies. The consoles are required to have a minimum of eight switches for activating messages and a microphone.
The Army and Air Force require LOC’s to be located so no operator has to travel more than 200’ horizontally to locate and LOC.
The Navy and Marines require only one LOC per building located as specified by the AHJ
28. Special Visual Signaling The Army and Air Force require a “Clear” Strobe for Fire Alarm Events and an “Amber” Strobe for Mass Notification Events
The Navy and Marines require only a “Clear” Strobe marked “Alert” for both Fire Alarm Events and Mass Notification Events
29. Audio Intelligibility When designing to meet intelligibility requirements, it is better to use lower wattage settings and add additional speakers. Higher wattage settings will create more reverberation and distortion.
Strobes are located in accordance with ADA requirements. Amber strobes need to have candela rating de-rated 20% to allow for the light reduction of the amber lens.
Army & Air Force – CIS = 0.8
Navy & Marines – CIS = 0.7
30. Integration to Base-Wide Systems The mass notification system should be integrated with the base-wide mass notification system if one is provided.
It is preferred that the mass notification system be integrated with the building fire alarm system to operate as a combined/single unit.
31. What Drives Intelligibility? NFPA 72
Voice Communication Systems
Emergency Communication Systems
UFC 4-021-01
Military Mass Notification
32. History of Intelligibility NFPA 72 – 1996
addressed Emergency Voice/Alarm Communication, no Intelligibility Requirements for these “voice” system
NFPA 72 – 1999
addressed in Section 4-3.1.5
Section 4-3.1.5 - Emergency voice/alarm communications systems shall be capable of the reproduction of prerecorded, synthesized, or live (for example, microphone, telephone handset, and radio) messages with voice intelligibility.
NFPA 72 – 2002 & 2007
Section 7.4.1.4. (Same at 1999, Section 4-3.1.5)
A-7.4.1.4 – More details that that in A-4-3.1.5
Table 10.4.2.2 - Methods of verification of voice intelligibility should include, but not be limited to, any one of the following methods:
Standard subject-based test methods such as described in ANSI S3.2, Method for Measuring the Intelligibility of Speech Over Communications Systems
Methods and instruments that measure certain physical parameters and provide a common intelligibility scale score such as described in IEC 60849, Sound systems for emergency purposes.
33. Why Intelligibility? What is Intelligibility - The capability of being understood or comprehended (distinguishable and understandable).
In simple terms – intelligibility is an evaluation of changes that occur to speech that impact comprehension.
If you can’t understand a voice message you cannot be make aware of the emergency event or special instructions.
34. NFPA Research Foundation Intelligibility of Fire Alarm & Emergency Communication Systems Project Summary
Changing threats and use of voice systems requires end-to-end communication path that does not hamper intelligible communications between those in command and the target audience
Immediate need to assess intelligibility testing protocols and intelligible system design guidance
Goal: “test” available design guidance and recommended methods for the performance testing of voice communication intelligibility.
Acknowledging important building characteristics: occupancy type, ceiling height, surface features, etc.
35. Technical Concepts Audibility: Measured in decibels (dBA)
Intelligibility: Predicted according to “Standardized Transmission Index (STI) or “Common Intelligibility Score” (CIS)
36. Technical Concepts Important building characteristics: occupancy type, ceiling height, surface features, etc
Factors related to talker/listener transmission path:
37. Methods of Measurement Phonetically Balanced Word Scores – 256 or 1,000 words to a panel of listeners
Modified Rhyme Test – rhyme test to a panel of listeners
Speech Transmission Index – STIr (male) – Calculation of modulation transfer function (computer modeling of areas).
Speech Transmission Index for Public Address – STIPA – Use STI-PA signal and intelligibility meter.
Speech Intelligibility Index – SII – Calculation of speech to noise spectra levels with hear threshold.
38. Acceptability Criteria The intelligibility of an emergency communication system is considered acceptable if at least 90 percent of the measurement locations within each Acoustically Distinguishable Space (ADS) have a measured STI of not less than 0.45 STI (0.65 CIS) and an average STI of not less than 0.50 STI (0.70 CIS).
90% Pass Rate
Minimum of 0.45 STI (0.65 CIS)
Average of 0.50 STI (0.70 CIS)
Test System Design/Components – not input signal
39. Limitations of Test Method Areas of high ambient sound pressure levels (“noise”) may be incapable of meeting the Acceptability Criteria.
Impulse sounds made during measurements may impact measurement accuracy or cause instrument error. (Example: door or file drawer closing).
Natural variation in ambient noise levels may affect the results.
40. UL 2572 Update UL 2572 – Control and Communication Units for Mass Notification Systems
The current version of L 2572 is an “Outline of investigation” also known as a “Desk Drawer Standard”. A collection of requirements from a number of standards.
Development began on June 3, 2009 with a new Standards Technical Panel (STP).
Six working groups were appointed to work on the development. It is expected that the final published standard will be very different then the current outline of Investigation.
41. UL 2572 Update GE/EST 3 has a UL Listing, but is based on the current outline of investigation. This means that once the UL 2572 standard is published, the EST 3 will need to undergo a file review and have to be re-submitted for testing to the new (final) requirements.
The ultimate intent is to develop a draft standard that will go out for ballot per the American National Standards Institute, ANSI standard development process. The next meeting of the STP is not expected to take place before the 1st Quarter of 2010. Realistically a standard ready for vote is at least 18 to 24 months away (2nd Quarter of 2011).
42. UL 2572 Update Manufacturers will be given time to comment and ask questions and to begin to submit there equipment for testing to this standard.
The UL 2572 STP is a balanced committee that includes representatives from a broad range of interest such as DOD, GSA, user groups, NFPA, UL and manufacturers.
43. Questions
44. Thank you for attending the 2009 Farenhyt Distributor Conference! Thank You!
Jack Poole, PE
Principal
Poole Fire Protection