80 likes | 274 Views
Jordan Navarro, Franck Marsa, Jean-Francois Forzy, Myriam El-Jaafari , Jean-Michel Hoc. Objective and subjective evaluation of motor priming and warning systems applied to lateral control assistance 報告者:楊子群. Introduction. 有高於 27% 的交通意外,是因為無預期的道路偏移所造成的。
E N D
Jordan Navarro, Franck Marsa, Jean-Francois Forzy, Myriam El-Jaafari , Jean-Michel Hoc Objective and subjective evaluation of motor priming and warning systems applied to lateral control assistance 報告者:楊子群
Introduction 有高於27%的交通意外,是因為無預期的道路偏移所造成的。 This study is a follow-up to Navarro et al. (2007) forthe validation of the MP principle. Motor priming
Method-participants 受測者 4位女性 16位男性 年齡 範圍:23-52歲 平均:34歲 每位受測者每年駕駛距離介於3000-40,000公里之間。(平均19,800公里)
Method-apparatus Uses a generic cockpit with fully operational commands. 6-axes motion platform Simulation software:SCANeRCII (Oktal).
Method-Route Two-lane secondary road 3.9km.(Lane width: 3.50 m) Road signs (including speed limits and bendwarnings) straight lanes speedlimited : 80 km/h. Bendslanes speedlimited : 70 km/h.(Sharp bend:50 km/h)
Method-driving assistance devices Auditory warning (AW) Wheel vibratory warning (WVW) Seat vibratory warning (SVW) Motor priming (MP) Auditory and motor priming (AMP)
Method-Distraction task This involved participants reading a succession of words displayed on a monitor placed on the dashboard (the position usually occupied by a car radio). While driving, participants were instructed to read aloud as many words as possible without looking at the road for the period of the distraction task.