340 likes | 502 Views
Use of Primary Care in VA and Medicare among VAMC and CBOC Patients. Chuan-Fen Liu, MPH PhD HERC Cyber Seminar September 17, 2008 . Dual Use, Continuity of Care, and Duplication of Services in VA and Medicare. Funded by VA HSR&D, IIR 04-292 Project team
E N D
Use of Primary Care in VA and Medicare among VAMC and CBOC Patients Chuan-Fen Liu, MPH PhD HERC Cyber Seminar September 17, 2008
Dual Use, Continuity of Care, and Duplication of Services in VA and Medicare • Funded by VA HSR&D, IIR 04-292 • Project team • Seattle: Chuan-Fen Liu, PhD; Michael Chapko, PhD; Chris Bryson, MD; Nancy Sharp, PhD; Mark Perkins, PharmD • Durham: Matt Maciejewski, PhD • Little Rock: John Fortney, PhD • Boston: Jim Burgess, PhD • University of Chicago: Will Manning, PhD
Outline • Background • Classification of primary care across VA and Medicare records • Goal: consistent classification of primary care • Preliminary results of comparisons of VAMC and CBOC patients in 2001 - 2004
Background • VA organizational reform • Veterans Eligibility Reform Act of 1996 • Moving from inpatient to primary care-oriented outpatient care • Establishment of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) in 1995 • Improve access to primary care • Contain cost of VA care
CBOCs • Congressional approval process • Services: primary care and mental health care (2001) • Two types: VA-staffed and contract • VA-staffed: VA providers or mixed; VA space • Contract: non-VA providers; non-VA space; capitated or fee basis • 718 CBOCs as of March 2008 • 162 contract and 556 VA-staffed CBOCs
Previous CBOC Evaluations • CBOC and VAMC comparisons • Comparable satisfaction and quality of care • CBOC patients – • More likely to be older, healthier, and new VA users • More primary care visits, but similar primary care costs • Lower odds of using specialty, mental health, ancillary and hospital services • Among users, fewer visits and lower costs in specialty, mental health, ancillary, and inpatient care • Lower total outpatient and total costs Chapko et al., Borowsky et al., Hedeen et al., Maciejewski et al., and Fortney et al., Medical Care 2002; Maciejewski et al., BMC HSR 2007
Issues with Previous Evaluations • Only examined VA experience • Were lower use and expenditure offset by higher non-VA use and expenditure?
Objective • Assess whether Medicare eligible veterans who get primary care at CBOCs have different primary care use than those who get primary care at VAMCs • Primary care use = VA or Medicare
Study Design • Retrospective cohort study • Study period: FY2000 – 2004 • Patient identification in FY2000 • Follow-up period: FY 2001 – FY 2004 • Study sample: • Medicare eligible VA primary care patients from the previous CBOC cost evaluation study • Random sample of primary care patients from 108 CBOCs and 72 VAMCs • Data sources: • Medicare claims • VA administrative datasets
Matching VA and Medicare Outpatient Services • Central challenge of identifying primary care in VA and Medicare • Data generating process • Clinical data vs. billing records • Financial incentives • Medicare doesn’t have stop codes • Goal: Classify VA and Medicare encounters as primary care or “other” in consistent way
VA providers Closed system Employed by VA Focus on treatment ICD-9 coding higher priority than CPT coding Providers code CPTs Clinic stops used to define outpatient care types Medicare providers Fee-for-service Individual practices Focus on billing payors CPT coding is priority Coders are instrumental UB-92 bill used to organize care Primary care not explicit Context of Reconciling Patient Data in Two Systems Incentives & organizational structures differ in two systems
Philosophies of Matching • Try to make VA look like Medicare • Use CPTs and match as though VA data are billing data (severely undercounts VA work) • Try to make Medicare look like VA • Classify Medicare claims into “Clinic Stops” • Create a hybrid and transform both • Pick and choose from data advantages and disadvantages in each sector
Classification of VA and Medicare Outpatient Databy Care Type
General Approach • Classify VA and Medicare outpatient encounters into “Care Type” using variables common to both systems • Primary Care • Specialty • Mental Health • Diagnostic • Combination of provider specialty and procedure (CPT-4) codes • Goal: Identify primary care with face validity and consistency
Provider Specialty Types • Primary care: • Physicians: family practice; internal medicine • Nurse practitioners: family practice; primary care; women’s health • Specialty care • Mental health • Diagnostic care
E&M Codes • Specialty care E&M codes • Performed by specialists • Performed in acute care and hospital settings • Primary Care E&M codes
Data Management • Outpatient encounter definition • Same patient, same date and same provider specialty • Omitted records for selected provider specialties • Podiatrists, dentists, etc. • Medicare claims • Need to convert Medicare claims into encounters • VA records: face-to-face encounters • Exclude phone stops or stops without provider contacts • Provider specialty • Medicare – one per record • VA – up to 3 per record • Use the first physician or nurse practitioner specialty code • Eliminate nurse, PA, intern, resident, nutritionist, or pharmacist as a provider
General Principles • If specialty provider, encounter cannot be primary care • If specialty E/M procedure or “Medicine procedure” encounter cannot be primary care
Comparisons of Primary Care Use among VAMC and CBOC Patients
Variable Definitions • VAMC/CBOC primary care user defined based on the majority of primary care visits in each year • Primary care user status in each year: • Dual users: at least one primary care visit in VA and one in Medicare • VA-only • Medicare only • Non-user • Number of VA, Medicare and total primary care visits in 2001 – 2004
Data Analysis • Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model with negative binomial distribution and log link with exchangeble correlation • Adjusted for sampling weights from the original CBOC study
Patient Characteristics *p<0.05; ***p<0.001
Unadjusted Primary Care Visits ***p<0.001
Multivariate Results of Primary Care Use Adjusted for patient characteristics ***p<0.001
Summary • CBOC patients were more likely than VAMC patients to use primary care services in Medicare • Similar time trends between CBOC and VAMC patients • The proportion of VA only primary care users decreased • Dual use stayed stable • Medicare only increased over time • Compared to VAMC patients, CBOC patients had • Fewer VA primary care visits • More Medicare primary care visits • Fewer total primary care visits, including both VA and Medicare
Limitations • Not a random sample of VA primary care users: original sample is primary care users in large CBOCs & VAMCs in 2000 • Imperfect classification of primary care visits across VA and Medicare systems with hybrid algorithm • No Medicaid data on non-elderly Medicare-eligible vets
Conclusions • Among Medicare eligible veterans: • CBOC patients use less VA primary care than VAMC patients • CBOC patients use more Medicare primary care • Difference between CBOC and VAMC patients in total primary care use decreases when Medicare use is included • Continuity of care, chronic disease management and performance assessment may be impacted by dual use of VA and Medicare primary care services, particularly for CBOC users.
Highlights of the Project • Determinants of primary care reliance in VA • Comparisons of continuity of primary care among VA-only primary care users, Medicare only primary care users and dual users • Duplication of services among dual users