1 / 7

Differences with 8.9

Differences with 8.9. SCO Paytape Staging No 2-tier in 8.4 PTools, so must load from HR UNX server.Tables changed from ?PI_' to ?SCO_'Not based on PS delivered Payroll Interface moduleMore logical breakout of Paytape data elementsViews are delivered that provide totals (for query/report purpose

binah
Download Presentation

Differences with 8.9

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Differences with 8.9 For details of the differences with the 8.9 application Please come to the HUG HCM 8.9 Delivery Workshops during the week of May 22nd LCD session will be held on Thursday May 25th from 10:45 – 12:15 in Salon B

    2. Differences with 8.9 SCO Paytape Staging No 2-tier in 8.4 PTools, so must load from HR UNX server. Tables changed from ‘PI_’ to ‘SCO_’ Not based on PS delivered Payroll Interface module More logical breakout of Paytape data elements Views are delivered that provide totals (for query/report purposes)

    3. Differences with 8.9 Check Creation Uses PS delivered tables for better integration to Self Service New Paycheck Creation Error pages Two ‘phases’ of process Check Creation JOB – job data match (CSULCD15.SQR), before checks are created (CSULCD20.SQR) Check Finalization JOB – completes paycheck creation based on error corrections (CSULCD20.SQR), then runs Update YTD Balances (CSULCD30.SQR) Views are delivered that provide totals (for query/report purposes)

    4. Differences with 8.9 Account Code Table becomes the Combination Code Table Main key to record is now FDM_HASH TL lookups still refer to Account Code Table Account Code Table has no effdt or setid MUST use CSU modification to populate Combo Code Table Treats value as a key Synchs up Combo Code and Acct Code table SQL does not perform HASH function CMS delivers FY Rollover process

    5. Differences with 8.9 PS Delivered Department Budget Table has a new required field called SUSPENSE COMBO CODE Must enter value or cannot save record Field not used by custom LCD processes PS delivers process to update this field en masse by FY Cannot be a GL Account value that actual expenses will post to Establish value called ‘SUSPENSE’ using delivered page for Combo Code Table

    6. Differences with 8.9 CSU Labor Distribution Reporting Table Removed nVision fields from table Pending addition of a few fields as ‘phase two’ upgrade development (tbd) Anticipated delivery date of enhanced table May 2006

    7. Differences with 8.9 What’s NOT different: Basic process flow/steps Balance, Distribution, Accounting Lines tables Integration Broker functionality (technical setup is a little different)

More Related