1 / 12

The Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center (KPPC)

The Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center (KPPC). Sieglinde Kinne E2 Specialist. EPA Reg 4 P2 Roundtable Meeting June 30, 2005. www.kppc.org. KPPC’s Services, Core Competencies & Mission. Services Technical assistance Outreach & Training Applied research

blake
Download Presentation

The Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center (KPPC)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center (KPPC) Sieglinde Kinne E2 Specialist EPA Reg 4 P2 Roundtable Meeting June 30, 2005 www.kppc.org

  2. KPPC’s Services, Core Competencies & Mission • Services • Technical assistance • Outreach & Training • Applied research • Core competencies are in P2, E2 & Environmental Management Systems (EMS) • Mission: The Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center at the University of Louisville is the Commonwealth's primary resource for technical information and assistance to improve environmental performance. The Center facilitates and promotes the proactive implementation of management systems and technologies to improve the competitiveness of businesses, industries, and other organizations.

  3. KPPC’s Services • Outreach & Training • Workshops, teleconferences, CDs & manuals • Website at www.kppc.org • On-site assessments • Pollution Prevention (P2) • Energy Efficiency (E2) • Environmental Management System (EMS) • 500+ over last 10 years (including 30 EMS & 45 E2)

  4. Energy Management Program MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL POLICY GOALS MONITOR & MEASURE TARGETS ENERGY PROFILE PROJECTS ENERGY ASSESSMENT MEASURE & VERIFY

  5. E2 Program Summary for1st Two Years • 17 E2 Audits Completed • 47 Total Opportunities: • Potential Savings >2.17 Million kWh Usage & 3,800 kW demand • $900,000 Annual Savings (Up to $296,000 for facility) • Implementation Costs = $438,000 • Overall Average Payback = 6 months (Range: Immediate to 5.5 years)

  6. E2 Program Summary for1st Two Years

  7. E2 Program Summary for 2003 – 2004 • Conducted 16 energy audits • 63 Total Opportunities • Potential Savings > 7 Million kWh usage & 13,400 kW demand • Annual Savings = $700,000 • Implementation Costs = $3.2 Million • Overall Average Payback = 7 Years

  8. Energy Use Partnership Goals:TA Information & Guidance • Goal 1: Develop Proposals for Funding of E2 Projects & Energy Outreach/Education Programs • Goal 2: Identify Standardized Electronic Format for Utility Data, July 2005 • Goal 3: Perform Energy Efficiency (E2) Audits at all 3 Organizations • Objective: Perform 10 E2 Audits by July, 2005 • Objective: Identify Existing Energy Control Systems & Perform Re-commissioning to Evaluate Performance • Objective: Participate in Energy Star Portfolio Manager Program

  9. Energy Use Partnership Goals:Education/Awareness of Issues • Goal 4: Identify & Highlight Successful Energy Programs • Goal 5: Develop E2 Technology Training for Facilities Personnel, July 2005 • Goal 6: Promote Alternative Financing Mechanisms such as ESPC • Goal 7: Develop E2 Awareness Training Program for all 3 Organizations (by 2006) • Goal 8: Work with Engineering Firms to Incorporate E2 Language into New Building Specifications

  10. Case Study:Leggett and Platt, Inc • Plant used an energy intensive paint and paint pre-treat process. • Through one year of follow-through we have watched this area change dramatically in terms of energy and process chemistry. • New pre-treat does not require heated water and needs fewer water changes. • New paint cures at lower temperatures.

  11. Case Study:Ambrake • Started with installation of 1GPM flow restrictors on 8 plating lines. Savings: $93,000/yr • As part of a P2 technology diffusion project, conductivity controls are being installed on one plating line and one paint line. • While working with company, opportunities for energy savings were identified as well. JIT manufacturing offers opportunities for significant conservation in both areas. • Implementation??

  12. KPPC Contact Info Sieglinde Kinne ………… s.kinne@louisville.edu Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center (KPPC) 420 Lutz Hall University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky 40292 Phone: (502) 852-0965 Fax: (502) 852-0964 Web Site: www.kppc.org ?

More Related