390 likes | 618 Views
1; movies. Topography of a fast spreading ridge (EPR). Topography of a slow spreading ridge (south atlantic). 2; topography. Melt beneath a fast-spreading ridge (East Pacific Rise). Ophiolites. 3; classic ophiolites. Oman ophiolite. Pillow lavas. Sheeted Dikes. Layered Gabbros.
E N D
Melt beneath a fast-spreading ridge (East Pacific Rise)
Stokes law Vs is the particles' settling velocity (vertically downwards if ρp > ρf, upwards if ρp < ρf) g is the acceleration due to gravity, ρp is the density of the particles, and ρf is the density of the fluid
Banded harzburgite Impregnated dunnite
Dynamic models of mantle convection Plumes coming up Plates going down Rapid, small-cell convection on Io
Why does the mantle melt to produce hot spot magmas? • Isentropic decompression melting • Fluxing by volatiles • Heating of the lithosphere by a hot plume • Unconventional heat sources
Simple variations on the decompression melting theme • Variations in potential temperature -- hotter mantle produces deeper melting, more magma • Variations in the thickness of the lithosphere -- controls the depth at which melting terminates • Fractional vs. batch melting • All of these can vary from hot spot to hot spot and within a single volcano, producing distinctive chemical signatures
Temperature variations near head of plume 3D Model by Ribe and Christensen
Why does the mantle melt to produce hot spot magmas? • Isentropic decompression melting • Fluxing by volatiles • Heating of the lithosphere by a hot plume • Unconventional heat sources
Why does the mantle melt to produce hot spot magmas? • Isentropic decompression melting • Fluxing by volatiles • Heating of the lithosphere by a hot plume • Unconventional heat sources
HSDP drilling in 1993 and 1999 into the flank of Mauna Kea volcano • >95% recovery, to a total depth of 3.1 km below sea level • Penetration through ~1 km of subaerial lavas, ~2 km of submarine deposits, both hyaloclastites and pillows
hyaloclastite formation -- “prograding delta” volcano growth
Trace elements and isotopic ratios are generally correlated with variations in SiO2 content (Kurz et al, 2003)
What if the length scales of compositional heterogeneities are small?