270 likes | 432 Views
FSAE Instrumentation 1/27/09. Ryan Gunn John Lee Dan Van Winkle Ali Yilmaz. Formula SAE. Intercollegiate competition New car every year Cars designed for non-professional auto cross racer Over 120 international teams. FSAE Competition Scoring. Data Acquisition System.
E N D
FSAE Instrumentation 1/27/09 Ryan Gunn John Lee Dan Van Winkle Ali Yilmaz
Formula SAE • Intercollegiate competition • New car every year • Cars designed for non-professional auto cross racer • Over 120 international teams
Data Acquisition System • Tuning is important • Driver feedback • Quantitative baseline • Support design decision • Driver evaluation
Operational Concept • Real time data capture • Post Processing • Real time data transmission* • Simultaneous data capture and transmission* • Data analysis and reduction • New/additional power sources* *Goals
Sensor Selection • Shock Position Sensor • Accelerometer • Wheel Speed Sensor • Oil Pressure Sensor • Steering Position Sensor
DAQS Options MoTec AIM Sports National Instruments cRIO
Motec • Pros: • Ease of installation • User Friendly GUI • Cons: • High cost ($4000-$6000 for data logging unit) • Limited to Motec sensors • Locked software
AIM Sports • Pros: • Cheaper than Motec • More, cheaper sensors available than Motec • Cons: • Price (~$2000) • Locked software
NI cRIO • Pros: • No cost for DACS or sensors • Changeable LabVIEW code • Modular Customizable • Cons: • Programming
Notes • All options provided: • Weight requirement • Free tech support • Free software
Decision NI cRIO is best choice for this application Cost is a critical factor Performance/accessibility factors can be worked on
Wireless Transmission • Daniel Alford, “Light Weight, Low Cost, Automotive Data Acquisition and Telemetry System" (MS thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2005) • “The testing performed shows that the wireless networking technology does not adversely affect the data being transferred” • Standard antenna not well suited (range) • Line of sight issues are the major problem
Decision • Wireless data transmission will not initially be pursued • Data logging issues • Dependability • Time constraints
Power Consumption • cRIO-20W • Accelerometer 180 μA - 2.52 mW • Oil Pressure - 40mW • Brake Pressure – 25mW • Rotary Potentiometer – 0.7mW • Proximity Sensor – 200mW • Total ~300mW ~1.8 Amperes
Comparing Batteries • Current Battery ODYSS PC310 • Drycell • 2.87 AH/kg • 8 AH • Possible Alternatives • Li Ion • 11.4 AH/kg • Stringent charging requirements
Accomplished Tasks • Installed software tools • Established connection with the cRIO • Updated software on cRIO • Tested real-time monitoring • Tested data logging
Real-time Monitoring • Significant lag • Requires constant connection to car (Requires wireless) • Useful for testing sensors and data acquisition code • Cannot log data simultaneously (Memory issues) • A nice to have
Data Logging • Currently must be connected to computer • Switch to turn on and off • Boot file • More complex process than real-time monitoring • Allows for future analyzing of data
Instructions Created • List of all modules necessary to run software • How to connect to the cRIO