1 / 18

November 12, 2012

Gender and Representativeness on Appointed Government Boards and Commissions in Charlotte Mecklenburg. November 12, 2012. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Women’ s Summit. Background.

brede
Download Presentation

November 12, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gender and Representativeness on Appointed Government Boards and Commissions in Charlotte Mecklenburg November 12, 2012 The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Women’ s Summit

  2. Background 2008 Women’s Summit reports on gender representation on local government boards and commissions in Charlotte Mecklenburg. • Women held 46% of county appointed positions and 33% of city appointed positions • Populate less strategic/economically impactful boards • More frequently did not hold leadership positions

  3. 2009 Review of 67 city/county boards Women accounted for appointments • 45% of County Commission • 41% of City Council • 37% of Charlotte City Manager • 30% Mayoral (McCrory) 19 boards had 50%+ female membership. 13 had no female members.

  4. 2010-2012 • Analysis of participation on boards/commissions in Charlotte Mecklenburg. • Review application and appointment process. • Research best practices in application, appointment processes. • Informational sessions with City, County and Mayor’s office to share findings, discuss process recruitment and retention enhancements. • Consult with City, County and Mayor’s office on implementing and evaluating enhancements.

  5. 2012 –Board/Commission Membership • Four categories evaluated for female appointments: • Average across all Char-Meck boards – 36% • Average of boards with City and County appointments – 34% • Average of boards with City appointments - 35% • Mayoral Appointments – 39% • 42% of the boards (City and County)have less than 30% women members. • 5% have no women.

  6. Research • Member/Applicant Survey • Those who currently serve on a board/commission • Those who have recently served, but no longer are for any reason • Those who have applied, but have not been appointed. • Emailed 754 potential respondents in April 2011. • Response rate of 34.5% • Member/Applicant Focus Groups • Annual Community Survey • 400 community members

  7. Findings • Women apply and are appointed at 40%.

  8. Representativeness • Boards/Commissions are not representative of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Community: • Median age = 20 years older than median age Charlotte Mecklenburg. • Higher educational attainment, wealthier. • Racial/Ethnic diversity not represented.

  9. Race/Ethnicity

  10. Getting Appointed • White men most likely to have personal connection with person who nominated them. • White women and non-white men reported networking related to appointment. • 63% of respondents reported they did not network relative to their appointment….they were already connected via professional or social networks of decision makers. • Most consistent feedback: Receipt of applications is not acknowledged.

  11. 2010 Annual Community Survey • 61% of Charlotte Mecklenburg residents aware of citizen advisory boards. • 64% 0f women surveyed were aware of boards/commissions vs. 58% of men. • Factors in awareness: • Age: • 44% people aged 18-24 • 52% people aged 25-34 • 68%+ of people aged 35-65 and older • Education: +/-40% of people with HS/Equivalent or less • Household income • Race/ethnicity

  12. Household income

  13. Ethnicity/Race

  14. Respondents learn of boards in multiple ways, TV and the newspaper being the most frequently cited

  15. Future Directions • Address the gender balance on all boards/commissions. • Determine to what extent are the most influential boards representative of the community. • Develop strategies to increase transparency in the process and of the representativeness of boards and commissions. • Active recruitment of women and minorities.

  16. Strategies for Enhancing Representativeness • Hold information sessions where people already gather to provide information about boards/commissions. • Active engagement of candidate pool - outreach to those who have applied but not yet been appointed to boards to determine interest in other vacancies.

  17. Strategies, cont’d • Cross train board/commission members and encourage them to try something new. • Encourage women to apply. • Promote/support “Women on Board Workshops.” • Annual Women on Board Workshop: December 6, 2012 8:30-4:30 pm. UNC Charlotte Center City Building. • For more information visit: www.womenssummit.uncc.edu

  18. With thanks to: • Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation • Tracy Montross, Special Assistant to Mayor Anthony Foxx • Janice Paige, Mecklenburg County Clerk • Stephanie Kelly, Charlotte City Clerk • Sophia Hollingsworth, Citizen Involvement Coordinator • Holly Whisman, Melissa Duscha and Reid Wodicka researchers

More Related