1 / 14

Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling. Mugurel Ionut Andreica Politehnica University of Bucharest Computer Science Department Romulus Andreica, Angela Andreica Commercial Academy Satu Mare. Summary. Motivation Personnel Scheduling Model

Download Presentation

Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling Mugurel Ionut Andreica Politehnica University of Bucharest Computer Science Department Romulus Andreica, Angela Andreica Commercial Academy Satu Mare

  2. Summary • Motivation • Personnel Scheduling Model • Scheduling with Personnel Ordering Restrictions • Scheduling with Increasing Optimal Employee Times • Conclusions & Future Work Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  3. Motivation • personnel scheuling objectives • maximize productivity • minimize losses • maximize profit • maximize satisfaction • minimize dissatisfaction Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  4. Personnel Scheduling Model • fixed quantity of work • arbitrarily decomposable into a sequence of activities • N employees • employee dissatisfaction=time dependent linear function • constraints • ordering constraints • time constraints Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  5. Scheduling with Personnel Ordering Restrictions (1/5) • any number of activities • take “zero” time to execute • tai=time when activity i is scheduled • dissatisfaction of employee j: ds(j,t) • ds(j,t)=wj·|t-tej| • wj=“weight” of the employee j • tej=optimal employee time (for employee j) • a(j)=the activity to which employee j is assigned • total dissatisfaction: Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  6. Scheduling with Personnel Ordering Restrictions (2/5) • we can choose • total number of activities • times when activities are executed • ordering of activties: tai<taj => i<j • assignment of employees to activities • objective: minimize total dissatisfaction • constraints • u<v => a(u)≤a(v) • ordering of employees (1,2,...,n) => employee u must be assigned to an earlier (the same) activity than (as) employee v (u<v) Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  7. Scheduling with Personnel Ordering Restrictions (3/5) • Tmax=max{tei} not too large + integer time moments => dynamic programming algorithm (O(N·Tmax)) • Dmin[i,t]=the minimum overalldissatisfaction of the employees i, i+1, …, N, if they are assigned to activities scheduled at time moments t’≥t • Dmin[N+1, t]=0 Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  8. Scheduling with Personnel Ordering Restrictions (4/5) • greedy algorithm • Tmax may be arbitrary • (integer time moments) • tasgn[i]=the time moment when a(i) is scheduled • initially, tasgn[i]=0 (for all employees) • during the algorithm’s execution • if (tasgn[i]=t) => may increase to t’>t (preserving the ordering constraints) • dinc[j]=the value by which the dissatisfaction of employee j increases if the employee is reassigned to an activity starting at time (tasgn[i]+1) • dinc[j]=wj, if tej≤tasgn[j] • dinc[j]=–wj, if tej>tasgn[j] • maintain an array incsum: Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  9. Scheduling with Personnel Ordering Restrictions (5/5) • select the minimum value of the array incsum (incsum[p]) • incsum[p]<0 • Tshift=largest negative value from the set {tasgn[q]-teq | p≤q≤N } • increase tasgn[q] (p≤q≤N) by |Tshift| • incsum[p]≥0 • the algorithm stops • easy implementation: O(N2) • tricky implementation (using the segment tree data structure): O(N·log(N)) Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  10. Scheduling with Increasing Optimal Employee Times (1/3) • same problem parameters as before, except: • te1≤te2≤…≤teN • constraints • fixed number of activities: k • schedule activities only at optimal employee times • extra parameter: • if an activity is scheduled at time tei => dei (employer’s dissatisfaction) • new objective • minimize total dissatisfaction: employees’ dissatisfaction + employer’s dissatisfaction Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  11. Scheduling with Increasing Optimal Employee Times (2/3) • dynamic programming algorithm • Dmin[i,j,0]=the minimum overall dissatisfaction if the ith activity is scheduled at time tej (and all the employees 1,2,…,j are assigned to one of the activities 1,2,..,i) • Dmin[i,j,1]=the minimum overall dissatisfaction if the ith activity is scheduled at a time moment t≤tej (and all the employees 1,2,…,j are assigned to one of the activities 1,2,..,i) Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  12. Scheduling with Increasing Optimal Employee Times (3/3) • initial values • Dmin[0,0,0]=Dmin[0,0,1]=0 • Dmin[0,j,0]=Dmin[0,j,1]=+∞ (for j>0) • the answer=Dmin[k,N,1] • naive algorithm: O(N2·k) • tricky implementation: O(N·k) • lower envelope of half-lines • double-ended queue (deque) data structure Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  13. Conclusions & Future Work • two (related) personnel scheduling problems • employee dissatisfaction -- time-dependent linear functions • complete matehmatical models + efficient algorithms for computing optimal schedules • results: mainly of theoretical interest => first step towards (more) practical situations Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

  14. Thank You ! Minimum Dissatisfaction Personnel Scheduling

More Related