1 / 20

University Science Indicators 1981-2006

University Science Indicators 1981-2006. Main Menu. You can select one or more institutions in the list. Select field. The standard version holds 24 fields. The deluxe version holds 106 fields that you can chose from. Specify Analysis: level. Select time period. Select type of analysis.

brenna-english
Download Presentation

University Science Indicators 1981-2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. University Science Indicators1981-2006

  2. Main Menu You can select one or more institutions in the list

  3. Select field The standard version holds 24 fields. The deluxe version holds 106 fields that you can chose from.

  4. Specify Analysis: level

  5. Select time period

  6. Select type of analysis

  7. Type of analysis In the first example, we are selecting: Level of Analysis: Overall Institution Time Period: Cumulative 26* year period Type of Analysis: Number of Papers *Note: The USI offers a Cumulative 26 year period in the 2007 version

  8. Number of papers overall, 1981-2006

  9. Number of papers overall, 2002-2006. This shows the most recent 5 years timing option, ranked.

  10. Trend analysis The “5-year overlapping periods” option allows you to normalize the trend line and remove unusual highs or lows. Select “Overall Institution” in “5-year overlapping periods” to obtain a 26-year trend in growth of papers.

  11. 26-year growth in papers

  12. Citation impact Similarly, If we choose to analyze Citation Impact, we can do so using the 5-year overlapping periods. Citation impact = Cites/papers.

  13. Citation impact for the 2001-2006 period(Citation Impact = Cites/papers)

  14. Impact relative to the world Citation impact is more meaningful when compared to world averages. We compare average cites per paper for each of the institutions (Impact) against the average Cites per paper worldwide (Imp Base) If the Relative Impact (Rel Imp) is over 1.0, the institution’s impact is higher than average.

  15. Analysis of fields

  16. Analysis of fields

  17. Field with institution: # papers Use the “Rank” toggle button to sort the institutions by paper *Note: Only 4 institutions (CMU, BGSU, BSU, & MTSU) and 2 fields (Physics & Performing Arts) included here due to amount of information.

  18. Field within institution as % of papers within the institution Where is the research emphasis at CMU? How does it compare with your peer schools?

  19. Trend analysis of papers by field, 1981-2006

  20. Questions?

More Related