1 / 22

Rapid Needs Assessments and GIS

Rapid Needs Assessments and GIS. Goals. Describe the uses of rapid needs assessments in post-disaster settings Understand the sampling methodology used with rapid needs assessments Discuss how geographic information systems can be used with rapid needs assessment

Download Presentation

Rapid Needs Assessments and GIS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rapid Needs Assessments and GIS

  2. Goals • Describe the uses of rapid needs assessments in post-disaster settings • Understand the sampling methodology used with rapid needs assessments • Discuss how geographic information systems can be used with rapid needs assessment • Provide examples of other types of rapid surveys in public health

  3. Rapid Needs Assessments • Provide information about community needs in disaster aftermath (1) • Provide information to match emergency needs with available resources • When used with rapid mobilization of resources can reduce adverse public health consequences (2)

  4. Rapid Needs Assessments • Rapid needs assessments can: • establish the extent/possible evolution of an emergency • measure the present/potential public health impact • determine existing response capacity and identify any additional immediate needs • inform priority response actions (3)

  5. Methodology • Accurate sampling is important • World Health Organization Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) cluster sampling methodology(4) • EPI method is a 2-stage cluster sample • 1st stage - 30 clusters (geographical areas) selected • 2nd stage - 7 points (housing units) within each cluster

  6. EPI Method • Easy to implement in the field • Requires few resources • Yields reasonably valid and precise estimates

  7. Two-stage cluster sampling • Has been adapted over the years for various purposes. (6) • 1960s – tool for local health departments to assess community coverage of immunization, service coverage • 1970’s – modified and used with smallpox eradication in West Africa • 1980s – adapted by WHO for EPI program • 1990s – revised to include community volunteers, incorporate census data and random sampling of second-stage participants. Adapted by CDC for rapid needs assessments after disasters

  8. EPI Cluster Sampling Example • Hurricane Andrew, Florida, 1992 • EPI cluster-sampling method used • Clusters defined in grid of quarter-mile square areas using street maps of 2 communities hit hardest by hurricane

  9. Cluster samplingHurricane Andrew • Street map of Homestead-Florida City with super-imposed sampling frame of quarter-mile square clusters used during rapid needs assessment after Hurricane Andrew. (6)

  10. Cluster SamplingHurricane Andrew • Survey--interviews conducted at 7 housing units in each of 30 clusters • Separate surveys conducted at 3, 7, and 10 days after hurricane landfall • Surveys used to provide information to public health officials for directing and monitoring relief units (6)

  11. Modified EPI Cluster Sampling • 1996, EPI cluster sampling method modified • Added features included the ability to: • Estimate size of overall post-disaster population • Estimate numbers of persons with specific needs • Assess number of damaged/destroyed housing units

  12. Modified EPI Cluster Sampling • Disaster site divided into blocks/clusters • First stage, a sample of n clusters (n=30 as in EPI method) such that: • Clusters with more housing units are likely to be included (probability proportional to estimated number of housing units) • Second stage, equal probability of k housing units is chosen (k=30 as in EPI method): • Interview conducted at each housing unit

  13. Modified EPI Cluster Sampling • Interviewer makes multiple attempts to conduct an interview at a selected housing unit • EPI method—interviewer moves to adjacent housing unit after single interview attempt • If repeated attempts do not result in interview, a “0” is recorded for that site • Allows for collection of more information than EPI method (housing units are counted, those damaged/destroyed are noted, all persons in selected households are counted) • Data can be used to estimate size of overall disaster population

  14. Modified EPI Cluster Sampling • Adopted by CDC as the standard for conducting rapid needs assessments after disasters • First used in North Carolina after Hurricane Isabel in 2003

  15. Rapid Surveys for Community Assessments • Rapid survey method used with post-disaster needs assessments can be adapted for other community assessments • Example: Rapid survey in Hispanic area of Los Angeles to look at immunization status (9) • Example: North Carolina county health departments conducting community health assessments and assessing population vulnerabilities prior to potential catastrophic events (10)

  16. Geographic Information Systems • Geographic information systems (GIS) can be a useful tool for conducting rapid needs assessments or rapid surveys • GIS can provide a more scientific approach to second stage randomization • Random points can be selected and plotted • Interviews are conducted with a resident of the house located nearest to the random point • Reduces potential selection bias by interview teams

  17. Advantages of Using GIS • Using GIS allows use of global positioning system (GPS)-based routing • GPS • Aids team in navigation • Provides more up-to-date maps • Replaces paper maps

  18. Advantages of Using GIS • GIS can replace paper-based surveys with computer-based surveys • GIS software can be uploaded onto handheld computers for field deployment • Computer-based data entry can save time, reduce data entry errors

  19. Summary • Rapid needs assessment is an essential component of disaster relief operations (6) • Rapid needs assessments allow public health officials to quickly identify and prioritize areas of need • Methods used with rapid needs assessment can be extended to other areas of public health

  20. References • 1. Surveillance and rapid needs assessment. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/hsb/disaster/surveillance.htm. Accessed April 24, 2008. • 2.Lillibridge SR, Noji EK, Burkle FM. Disaster assessment: The emergency health evaluation of a population affected by a disaster. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:1715-1720. • 3. World Health Organization. Rapid health assessment proocols for emergencies. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1999:1. • 4. Frerichs RR. Rapid surveys. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles Web site. http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/rapidsurvey.html. Updated May 26, 2008. Accessed June 4, 2008.

  21. References •  5. Lemenshow S, Robinson D. Surveys to measure programme coverage and impact: A review of the methodology used by the Expanded Programme on Immunization. World Health Stat Q. 1985;38:65-75. • 6.Hlady WG, Quenemoen LE, Armenia-Cope RR et al. Use of a modified cluster sampling method to perform rapid needs assessment after Hurricane Andrew. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23(4):719-725. • 7. Malilay J, Flanders WD, Brogan D. A modified cluster-sampling method for post-disaster rapid assessment of needs. Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(4):399-405. • 8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rapid community health and needs assessments after Hurricanes Isabel and Charley—North Carolina, 2003—2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:840-842.

  22. References • 1. Frerichs RR, Shaheen MA. Small-community-based surveys. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:231-247. • 2. Horney J, Snider C, Gammons L, Ramsey S. Factors associated with hurricane preparedness: Results of a pre-hurricane assessment. J Natural Dis. 2008;3(2):143-149.

More Related