1 / 18

Coping with di versity in sport clubs in the Brussels periphery

Coping with di versity in sport clubs in the Brussels periphery. Rudi Janssens – Eccar conference Ghent 24/11/2011. Outline. 1. Linguistic diversity : Political context versus societal multilingualism 2. Project: coping with linguistic diversity 3. Conclusions.

caitir
Download Presentation

Coping with di versity in sport clubs in the Brussels periphery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Coping withdiversity in sport clubs in the Brussels periphery Rudi Janssens – Eccar conference Ghent 24/11/2011

  2. Outline • 1. Linguisticdiversity:Political context versus societalmultilingualism • 2. Project: coping withlinguisticdiversity • 3. Conclusions

  3. 1.1. Languagepolicy: territorialism

  4. 1.2. Multilingualpopulation

  5. 1.3. Locallanguagepolicy:protectingFlemishcharacter of the region • Dutch onlylanguageaccepted in official context • Butmonolingualpoliticalidealalsoapplied to: • Linguistic landscape • Languageuse in shops • Languageuse in sportsclubs,associations..

  6. 1.4. Tension politics – sports clubs Localpolicy makers • Objective: preserve Flemishcharacter of localcommunity and localassociations • Means: - financial- access to infrastructure • Statement:Multilingualism is problem • Localsports clubs • Objective:sportsactivitieswithyoungstersfrom the region • Means:- support of localcommunity / parents- use of localinfrastructure • Statement:Sports is our core business

  7. 2.1. Research project • Research question:Cansportsclubs play a role in the linguisticintegration of youngstersinto the localcommunity? • Selection clubs: - localfootball team workingwithyoungsters (n=20)- other most important sports club (n=20) • Data: - Interviews withlocal and regionalpolicy makers, members of sportscouncils and civilservants (n=53) - Interviews withmembers of the board of the localclubs, trainers, volunteers (n=101) - Questionaireforplayers and theirparents (n=326) - Observations training

  8. 2.2. Languageuse in formal setting versus informalsituation Formal: official meeting Informal: smalltalk

  9. 2.3. Languageuseduringcompetition versus training Formal: competition Informal: training

  10. 2.4. Is there a problem with multilingualism? • ‘Yes’, according to 14.3% of the interviewees on the political level, 3.0% on sports club level • Do you consider the situation as problematic?- Strongly agree: 0%- Rather agree: 6.3%- Neutral: 10.5%- Rather disagree: 25.9%- Strongly disagree: 27.3%

  11. 2.5. General ideasabout clubs and language

  12. 2.6. Effect of multilingualism in clubs

  13. 2.7. Opportunities for ‘language stimulation? • Broad support for multilingual clubs- only 15% prefers Dutch (monolingual) clubs- for 60% opportunity to practice other languages- evolution towards multilingualism inevitable • willingness to work on language ‘stimulation’- club board: 72.5%- trainers: 67.4%- players: 57.1%

  14. 2.8. Implementation of ‘language stimulation’? • Integrate into trainers courses Organisation: Clubs National Football Association (eventually, if on broader scale) Financial support: municipality But: only minority wants real action!!!

  15. 3.1. Conclusions: Current situation • Multilingualism is a fact=> the more informal, the more multilingual • Issue due to geographical location:- municipal regulation (political issue)- vague regulation on level of club (financial issue)=> matter of board, trainers and players are often unaware

  16. 3.2. Conclusions: Vision on multilingualism • Multilingualism is additional value (personal) • The more multilingual a club is, the more its members appreciate it • Stimulates contact with other language speakers => integrationas long as Dutch is prominent as well

  17. 3.3. Conclusions: Future • Evolution towards more multilingualism • Sport central issue, language learning only an opportunity • Trainer central role: good practices • Clubs decide on it, but cannot afford to pay

  18. 3.4. Policy Recommendations • Political problem ≠ problem for clubs=> extra attention can be counterproductive=> politicians create problem in clubs • Politics can create framework without obligationsSupport for clubs who take initiatives • Indirect pressure based on local reglementations

More Related