1 / 29

Superintendent Professional Growth and Effectiveness System

Superintendent Professional Growth and Effectiveness System. Superintendent Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (SPGES). A companion system complimenting Teacher and Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness Systems

caitir
Download Presentation

Superintendent Professional Growth and Effectiveness System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Superintendent Professional Growth and Effectiveness System

  2. Superintendent Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (SPGES) • A companion system complimenting Teacher and Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness Systems • Driving a model of Professional Growth and learning for all Kentucky educators • Professional Growth and Effectiveness for Kentucky superintendents based on common clearly defined standards

  3. History of the development of Superintendent PGES • Commissioner Holliday met with Superintendent Advisory Council Spring 2013 • Discussed urgency to improve transparency and effectiveness in superintendent evaluations across Kentucky • Result – Superintendent Advisory Council (SAC) recommended the incorporation of three specific components into current evaluation process across Kentucky

  4. Superintendent Advisory Council Recommended: • Incorporate critical superintendent/board conversations into existing Kentucky superintendent evaluation systems • Upload assurances into ASSIST as evidence of critical conversations • Development of a new superintendent effectiveness system by December 2014

  5. SAC Recommendations 1 and 2 Critical conversations and the role of ASSIST

  6. Superintendent Evaluation Report for ASSIST Review and discuss with board in openmeeting(s) and document in board minutes: 1. District delivery targets – • student proficiency • college/career-readiness • graduation rates • closing achievement gaps • whether processes are in place to implement PGES for all certified staff in 2014-15

  7. Superintendent Evaluation Report for ASSIST 2. Resource/support systems -- effectiveness and efficiency of district operations • balanced operating budget • district resources leveraged to: • attain the best use • improve learning • compliance with legal policy standards • district budget and resources communicated to board

  8. Superintendent Evaluation Report for ASSIST 3. Facilities and resources • district performance on TELL survey in these areas

  9. Superintendent Evaluation Timetable • By December 20, 2013: Board and superintendent discuss three components in open meeting and complete the Superintendent Evaluation Diagnostic in ASSIST; upload board minutes documenting discussion of three components. Completed by 173 Supts. • Spring/Summer 2014: During summative evaluation in open meeting, discuss progress and performance on three components; complete Superintendent Evaluation Diagnostic in ASSIST; upload documentation.

  10. Future of Superintendent Evaluation Reportfor ASSIST • At the recommendation of the SPGES Steering Committee, the Superintendent Evaluation Report for ASSIST will become an annual component of the Comprehensive District Improvement Plan titled “Superintendent Assurances.” • This process will capture the superintendent/board conversations on an annual basis. • Training and support material development for Kentucky superintendents is now underway.

  11. Superintendent Assurances Report ASSIST Screen Shot - Draft

  12. SAC Recommendation #3 Develop a new Superintendent Evaluation tool for Kentucky Superintendents

  13. Next-Generation Superintendent Effectiveness System Steering Committee (NxGESSESC) KDE created the committee in August 2013 with the following membership: • Terri Cox-Cruey, Superintendent, Kenton County Schools • Jim Evans, Superintendent, Lee County Schools • Bob Rogers, Superintendent, Murray Independent Schools • Owens Saylor, Superintendent, Daviess County Schools • Henry Webb, Superintendent, Floyd County Schools • Wayne Young, Kentucky Association of School Administrators • Rhonda Caldwell, Kentucky Association of School Administrators • Lu Young, Fayette County Schools • Wilson Sears, Kentucky Association of School Superintendents • David Baird, Kentucky School Boards Association • Kerri Schelling, Kentucky School Boards Association • Dianne Mackey, Daviess County Local School Board Member • Jo Sabol, West Point Independent Local School Board Member • George Wilson, Green River Regional Educational Cooperative • Robert Brown, Educational Professional Standards Board • Bob King, Council on Postsecondary Education • Tommy Floyd, Chief of Staff, Kentucky Department of Education

  14. Charge to Next-Generation Superintendent Effectiveness System Steering Committee (NxGSESSC) Utilize existing work of new superintendent training process: The original design team for Kentucky Association of School Administrators (KASA) New Superintendent Training Standards and Indicators conducted crosswalk of existing Superintendent related standards: • North Carolina Standards for Superintendents (2007) • The Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning’s (McRel) School district leadership that works: the effect of superintendent leadership on student achievement(2006) • ISLLC Standards – Educational Leadership Policy Standards as adopted by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA) • The Kentucky School Boards Association’s (KSBA) Performance Planning and Review for Superintendent Evaluationand • AdvancEd’sStandards for Quality School Systems. • The resulting Pilot Kentucky Next-Generation Superintendent Effectiveness Standards represent a synthesis of those competencies and skills found across these key bodies of work organized around seven leadership performance standards.

  15. Next-Generation Superintendent Effectiveness System Steering Committee (NxGSESSC) • Charge – Create a SPGES for Kentucky Superintendent Evaluation • Committee met on the following dates: • August 15, 2013 • October 17, 2013 • December 16, 2013 • February 12, 2014 • March 17, 2014 • April 9, 2014 – KBE Reviewed the final recommendations

  16. Next-Generation Superintendent Effectiveness System Steering Committee (NxGESSESC) • Products and recommendations to KBE • Formative Superintendent Leadership Plan (SLP) document • Summative SPGES documentfor collection of reflections • Rubric for a locally developed tool/document • Next steps • Continued collaboration in planning for training with:

  17. Superintendent Leadership Plan (SLP)

  18. SLP – Document arranged in Standards and Indicators by Performance Levels • Standard – Language describes action by superintendent regarding district effectiveness in specified area – Broad category. • Indicator – Provides example behaviors demonstrated by the superintendent related to the standard above • Performance level - language by indicator to capture current progress of Superintendent

  19. SPGES Performance Levels Recommended bySteering Committee The following designations will be used to indicate the progress of a superintendent toward the seven standards and their indicators:

  20. Standards and Indicators Example -Standard 2 Instructional Leadership SLP Screen Shot

  21. Superintendent PGES Example Process • Using the SLP – Superintendent conducts self-assessment and reflects on standards and indicators vs. own performance levels • Individual board members use SLP to reflect on superintendent progress on standards and indicators vs. performance levels – also consider previous areas of emphasis on earlier evaluations with experienced superintendents • Entire board and superintendent meet to discuss individual reflection/assessment results – (Some boards may prefer that results are compiled by board chair or board attorney and then discussed with superintendent) • Board and superintendent collectively develop area(s) of emphasis for professional growth plan (PGP)

  22. Superintendent PGES example process continued… • Superintendent undertakes PGP and begins to collect and retain evidence toward area(s) of emphasis (standards) identified in PGP • Superintendent shares collected evidences with board throughout year to demonstrate efforts toward increased competencies in areas of emphasis. • According to existing district timeline for superintendent evaluations, board considers and incorporates submitted superintendent evidences into superintendent annual performance evaluation using SPGES summative document. • Board collectively determines superintendent performance levels in established areas of emphasis for annual evaluation

  23. Summative SPGES document Performance Levels: The following designations will be used to indicate the progress of a superintendent toward the seven standards and their indicators: Exemplary: Exceeds the standard Accomplished: Meets the standard Developing: Makes growth toward meeting the standard Growth Required: Area(s) required to be addressed in the Professional Growth Plan

  24. Important Concepts in SPGES • Self-Assessment • Reflect on Standards • Discussion with board formatively • Consensus on area(s) of emphasis • PGP development • Competency model through evidence • Period sharing of evidence with board • Summative cycle on evidence collected in area(s) of emphasis

  25. Explanation of Rubric for Locally-Developed Tool At a minimum, the locally developed format will: • Include a formative document (superintendent leadership plan) and a summative document • Be clearly established on and aligned to research-based, common standards (i.e., steering committee work equivalence) • Allow for a competency/growth model (i.e., steering committee work equivalence) • Include performance-based, non-numerical, superintendent performance levels (i.e., steering committee work equivalence)

  26. Explanation of Rubric for Locally-Developed Tool Continued… At a minimum, the locally developed format will: • Allow opportunities for superintendent-provided evidence in standards of emphasis • Support superintendent self-reflection and self-evaluation process • Support superintendent/board collaborative identification of standards for emphasis • Establish clear growth goals in targeted areas for superintendent evidences

  27. SPGES Timeline (anticipated): • April-June 2014 – SPGES document(s) and alignment rubric in final form • July 2014 – Letter to superintendents and board chairs on preference for SPGES or locally developed system • December 2014 – Districts to notify department choice of SPGES or locally developed system • 2014-15 – SPGES statewide pilot • 2015-16 – SPGES statewide implementation

  28. Next Steps… Continued collaboration with: • Kentucky School Boards Association • Coordination of school board member training on the process and its implementation. • Kentucky Association of School Superintendents • Ongoing professional development for existing superintendents through feedback • Kentucky Association of School Administrators • Coordination of process feedback with new superintendent training and experienced superintendent needs • Council on Postsecondary Education and Educational Professional Standards Board • Coordination on areas of emphasis based on feedback

  29. For More Information Contact: • Thomas G. Floyd, Ed. D. • Chief of StaffKentucky Department of Education500 Mero Street, 1st FloorFrankfort, KY 40601Phone: (502) 564-3141Fax: (502) 564-9321Tommy.Floyd@education.ky.gov

More Related