1 / 18

Technology in the Large Classroom

Technology in the Large Classroom. David Cordes Computer Science Department University of Alabama. Workshop Goals and Format. Goals: Understand the issues & problems inherent in a large classroom environment Be aware of how other institutions are using technology to address these problems

caitir
Download Presentation

Technology in the Large Classroom

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technology in the Large Classroom David Cordes Computer Science Department University of Alabama

  2. Workshop Goals and Format • Goals: • Understand the issues & problems inherent in a large classroom environment • Be aware of how other institutions are using technology to address these problems • Demonstrate classroom technology • Focus: • Electronic Response Systems • Format: • Interactive, group-based approach March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  3. Workshop Overview • Introductions • Problem identification • Definition of a “large classroom environment” • Problems inherent in the large classroom • Demonstration • sample “electronic response system” • Classroom changes w/electronic response system • Existing tasks and activities • New paradigms • Information dump on electronic response systems March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  4. Round-robin Please give your: Name Discipline Institution Largest course ever taught Attendees Diane Schuch-Miller, schmild@focushope.edu Chen-Nee Chuah, chuah@ece.ucdavis.edu Russ Pimmel, rpimmel@coe.eng.ua.edu Rich Freuler, Rick.Freuler@osu.edu Anwar Haque, ahaque@coe.eng.ua.edu Muhammed Sharif, msharif@coe.eng.ua.edu Sue Kemnitzer, skemnitz@nsf.gov Introductions March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  5. Task Definition • Large classroom environment • At least 100 students in the room • Instructor has presentation system of some sort • Computer and projection system • Overhead projector and transparencies • Lecture-hall style organization of the room • No tables for team/group work • Any suggested changes to this definition? March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  6. Task Identification • Goal: • Identify issues regarding classroom management that are magnified in a large class environment • Process • Think-pair-share • Think about the question individually for one minute, write down your list of issues • Share this list with a neighbor • Report out to the entire group March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  7. Problems that are compoundedin a large classroom environment • Less one-on-one time with students • Lack of personal contact • Collecting and handing papers back • Hard to gauge the progress of students • More difficult to control the environment, disruptive behavior becomes a bigger problem • Students may have perception it is not necessary to pay attention in a large class • Hard to assign a single project to the entire class • Diminished opportunities for active & cooperative learning • Harder to get student participation, but if you do, then you won’t have time to cover the material that you do • All require a lot more organization (to deal with the above issues) March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  8. Demonstration of anElectronic Response System • Classroom Performance System • http://www.einstruction.com • Basic system configuration • Individual transmitters (issued to the student) • Receiver(s) located around the classroom • Disclaimer: • Workshop is not endorsing CPS • Variety of products exist in the marketplace • Functionality is quite similar • Comments • Keep our list of “problematic issues” in mind during the demo • Will examine costs and requirements later March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  9. CPS Demonstration • Short demonstration of the system • Class rosters • Attendance • Questions/quizzes • Opinions and thoughts on a topic • Q & A regarding the system • Focus on its functionality • Will discuss cost/implementation later March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  10. Using an ERSGroup Exercise #1 • Working in a group (self-selected): • Identify a subject (topic) of interest to the group • Identify a lecture within this topic • Identify three different activities/exercises that you could use in a large classroom to check student comprehension and understanding • Report out to the rest of the workshop March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  11. Activity #1 Group Reports • Appropriate for definitions, one-step questions • Had trouble with multiple-step problems • Could ask questions per step, (what is the next step?) • Had trouble with having them give us a process (as an answer) as opposed to a concept or idea • Saw a good application when talking about their perceptions of their understanding • How well did you understand this idea • Talked about how you could capture their feelings about the issue • How do you feel about this? • Do you think this is important? March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  12. Activity #1 Group Reports • Followed the suggested format, picked a topic of statics – resolution of forces/vectors • Discussed how to use something like this as a tool in three areas • Inventory of concepts prior to beginning the lecture or presentation (where are they now) • Out in the middle of the lecture, do a ‘check-quiz’ to see what they’ve learned after 20-30 minutes • Measure what they learned at the end, could be done in a competition-based way (how many people got the answer in a specified time?) March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  13. Using an ERSGroup Exercise #2 • Working in your groups: • Same topic, same subject • Identify three different activities that you could insert into the classroom presentation that would change the behavior in the classroom (and hopefully increase thinking and learning) • Report out to the rest of the workshop March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  14. Activity #2 Group Reports • More interaction, more cooperative learning situations • Allows improved attention (keeps students involved) • Helps the attention span (cycle of learning) • Figure out what the most optimum/efficient way of teaching a concept out • Based on background or interests of the class • Figure out some base point • Do we repeat if less than N% understand? • Allows you to determine the direction the presentation goes (speed up, slow down, etc.) March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  15. Activity #2 Group Reports • Shift the control of the lecture to the students • Examples: ask them “which of the two topics we cover today do you want to emphasize?” or “do you want to see another example” • Active involvement • A combination of understanding versus perception questions will probably get more responses • Eliciting prior knowledge • Example: statistics, some students might claim they do not know it, but they do have some prior knowledge • Peer review • Other students can evaluate/score a student presentation • Motivation • Give concrete examples of how certain principles or theories is applicable before we teach it March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  16. ERS Information Dump • About 8 to 10 companies active in the area • Same basic functionality for all products • Some designed for corporate setting, others focus on education arena • Basic system package includes: • Software (PC-based) • Transmitters for the students • Receiver(s) to collect responses March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  17. ERS Information Dump (continued) • Large classrooms require multiple receivers • Can connect receivers together seamlessly • Individual transmitters vary in complexity • Low-cost/simple versus elaborate/expensive • Student-owned versus tethered to classroom • Different processes for attendance, both options work • Tethering can be an issue (esp. w/ expensive models) • Investment costs (150 person classroom) • Prices range from $4K to $40K March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

  18. ERS Vendors • Classroom Performance Systemhttp://www.einstruction.com • Fleetwood Reply Systemshttp://www.replysystems.com • Group Response Systemhttp://www.xtol.com • Interactive Horizonshttp://www.inthorizons.com • Meridia Audience Response Systemshttp://www.meridia-interactive.com • Personal Response Systemhttp://www.educue.com/Home.htm • Quick Tally Audience Response Systemhttp://www.quick-tally.com • StarNet Interactivehttp://www.mg-interactive.com March 16th – 18th, 2003 Share The Future IV ConferenceTempe, Arizona

More Related