180 likes | 245 Views
GaMEP Center Review. February 13, 2002. Overview. Our Organization Five Strategic Initiatives Previous Panel’s Recommendations and Our Response GaMEP’s Performance. Ga Tech EDI: GaMEP’s Host Organization. Serving Existing Industry is an integral part of economic development
E N D
GaMEP Center Review February 13, 2002
Overview • Our Organization • Five Strategic Initiatives • Previous Panel’s Recommendations and Our Response • GaMEP’s Performance
Ga Tech EDI: GaMEP’s Host Organization • Serving Existing Industry is an integral part of economic development • Strong State support for this integrated approach
Leverage • EDI leverages its complementary resources for the benefit of all sponsors • SETAAC & EDA University Center • GPAC • FaciliTech • NASA • Big Georgia Tech • A budget vs. B budget • DOE • Economic Development Programs
Five Strategic Initiatives • Integrating the strategies of our sponsors • Increasing the recognition, advocacy and support of our brand • Strategic partners • Communications • Discretionary funding
Panel Recommendations • Be a leader in the national system • High performing center • Strong, stable state support • Strong in product development • Active and involved • Ned Ellington • Sharing our products and services • 360vu participation • Being a resource to other Centers
Panel Recommendations • Move forward rapidly with reorganization • Hired EDI Manager • Hired Center Manager • Redefined Service Regions • Hired Seven New Region Managers • Integrated Service Strategy – Shared goals • Improving our Metrics and Client Engagement processes • Improving our board structure
Panel Recommendations • Set forth a specific path for success • Great people • Common vision • Reaching high • Evaluating results • Constantly Improving
Panel Recommendations • Establish priorities for metrics • We embrace the Center in Good Standing Metrics as our measure of performance • Will add additional metrics relating to: • Impact • Visibility • Revenue
Panel Recommendations • Improve Key Processes • Work teams active in metric and client engagement processes • Results show our improvement • Improved survey response • Reduced customer dissatisfaction
Panel Recommendations • Balance our focus on market penetration, economic impact and/or revenue generation as our strategy • Larger, more significant projects • Higher impacts • Integrating our product lines, approaching our client more strategically
We Believe: • We’ve performed well • But we intend to do better • We have good systems • That we aim to continuously improve • We have great people • Who will continue to be our strength • We are a leader in the MEP network • And we’re looking to leverage this for our mutual benefit