1 / 6

Report from OB & LHCC

Ian Bird WLCG MB, 19 th March 2013. Report from OB & LHCC. OB: 8 th March. Removal of support for CMS by ASGC (no Tier 1 or Tier 2) Discussion on rethinking the pledge process/timing Try to avoid the “decreasing spiral pledge” problem Action to discuss with RSG – ideally in MB

calvin
Download Presentation

Report from OB & LHCC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ian Bird WLCG MB, 19th March 2013 Report from OB & LHCC Ian.Bird@cern.ch

  2. OB: 8th March Ian.Bird@cern.ch • Removal of support for CMS by ASGC (no Tier 1 or Tier 2) • Discussion on rethinking the pledge process/timing • Try to avoid the “decreasing spiral pledge” problem • Action to discuss with RSG – ideally in MB • Presentations on: • Concurrency forum and likely evolution • Data Preservation – outlook • Updating the computing models

  3. OB & LHCC Ian.Bird@cern.ch • Significant topic was resource requests for 2015 • Important to have the computing model updates in order for the LHCC to make supporting statements about the due diligence of efforts to be efficient • Updated estimates of 2015 needs given to RSG and summarised/discussed in OB and LHCC • Details on next slides • A few indications of countries where resources may become an issue; but not of major concern yet (but we need to see the pledges!) • We assume flat budgets – in some cases they are downwards

  4. 2013  2015 resources CPU Disk Tape 2013: pledge OR actual installed capacity if higher Ian.Bird@cern.ch

  5. Resource evolution – 1 Ian.Bird@cern.ch • For ALICE requests essentially flat for 2014/15, assuming KISTI + Mexico are available • Have introduced new processing schema, less full processing passes • Significantly improved CPU efficiency for analysis  • ATLAS: • Ongoing efforts to reduce CPU use, event sizes, memory, … • Fit within a flat budget, but assumes event sizes and CPU/event are at 2012 levels – this implies significant effort during LS1 to achieve • Plans for improvements are ambitious 

  6. Resource evolution – 2 Ian.Bird@cern.ch • CMS: • 2015 request also fits within a flat budget, as long as 2014+2015 are planned together (step from flat resources to 2015 needs exceeds flat funding) • Significant effort required to reduce potential x12 increase in need (to get back to “only” x2) due to: • Pile-up increase, change of trigger rates, going from 50-25ns (had unexpected effect on reco times) • Use Tier 1s for prompt reconstruction; do only 1 full reprocessing / year • Also commissioned large Tier 2s for MC reconstruction, using remote data access (result of data federation work in last 18 months) • LHCb: • Have sufficient CPU for LS1 needs; but limited by available disk • Potentially means cant use all CPU in 2014, then implications for 2015 (MC work gets pushed back) • Significant effort needed to reduce size of DST & no. disk copies • They have already reduced disk copies so now needs significant changes in data management to get more gains • Also working to improve software, but needs specialised effort (parallelisation, etc)

More Related