1 / 33

Bridging the gap with all users

20th May 2003. Bridging the gap with all users. Driving interactive behaviour through usability and accessibility. Jon Dodd. What is usability & accessibility?. Lessons from bricks and mortar. What makes a good library?. Building. Librarian. Bookshelves. Ramp. Universality.

capersr
Download Presentation

Bridging the gap with all users

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 20th May 2003 Bridging the gap with all users Driving interactive behaviour through usability and accessibility Jon Dodd

  2. What is usability & accessibility? Lessons from bricks and mortar

  3. What makes a good library? Building Librarian Bookshelves Ramp

  4. Universality What makes a good website? Online Presence User Interface Information Architecture TechnicalAccessibility

  5. ‘Technical accessibility’ is not enough Usability benefits everyone Both required for a successful site

  6. Why is accessibility important? Why is accessibility Important?

  7. Reasons for accessibility • Rational (business) • Moral • Legal / obligational

  8. Rational reasons • Greater audience reach • >37 million disabled in Europe (1 in 10) • Equipment and location unpredictable • Lower support costs • 1 source of information instead of many • Easier/cheaper to change/maintain/update… • Enhanced reputation

  9. Not everyone uses one of these

  10. From handhelds

  11. …to Internet cars

  12. 1x Science Traveller International Air Mosaic Demo Sprynet AllWorld Explorer G.O. International Air Service Amaya W3C Arachne xChaos Ariadna Advanced Multimedia System Design AtomNet Change 7 AWeb AmiTrix Beonex Ben Bucksch Bobby Center for Applied Special Technology Bohemian Net Browser BohemianNet BrownIE Compunet Browse2000 1st Choice Software CAB Alexander Clauss Cello Thomas Bruce Charlie Mundial Avenue ChiBrow KCS & Associates Chimera University of Nevada Las Vegas Custom Browser LION Cyberdog Apple Computer, inc. CyberGate BlackSun Interactive Cyber Passage Sony DigiCams DigiBand DOSLynx University of Kansas DR-WebSpyder Caldera Emacs-W3 William M. Perry Emissary Attachmate FreeWebBrowser Yellow Tree Services Galahad Jean van Waterschoot goAnywhere! Mikey LeBeau Grail Corporation for National Research Initiatives GrassHopper MDI Explorer Santrim Software HandWeb Smartcode Software HexaBit Junior HexaBit Home Page Reader IBM HotJava Sun Microsystems I-comm Talent Communications I-O-D-4 - The Web Stalker Escape I-View EnReach Technology iBrowse Omnipresence International iCab Alexander Clauss & iCab Company Internet Explorer Sprynet Internet Explorer Microsoft Internet Plus Dean Software Design Internet WorkHorse MarketNet KidNet Explorer Resource Communications KidSafe Explorer Arlington Technology LIS Web Browser Lahman Internet Services Lynx Distributed Computing Group MacLynx Olivier Gutknecht MacWeb TradeWave (EINet) MacWWW (Samba) CERN MathBrowser MathSoft Microviet First Explorer Microviet Minuet University of Minnesota Mosaic National Center for Supercomputing Applications Mosaic QuarterDeck NetForKids WebData Communications Net M@anager Virtual Innovations Netomat Maciej Wisniewski NetPositive Be, Inc. NetSentry Natdat NetShark InterCon NetShift NetShift Software Nuthin' But Net PAKSoft Productions Off By One Home Page Software OmniWeb OmniGroup Opera Opera Software PowerBrowserMosaic SpryNet Mosaic Spyglass Mozilla The Mozilla Organization Multilingual Mosaic Accent Software MultiWeb Viewer MultiSource MyBrowser Softorange Navigator Netscape Communications Corporation NCompass ExCITE NeoPlanet NeoPlanet Net-Tamer Net-Tamer NetCaptor Stilesoft NetCruiser Netcom  Oracle ProStream Browser PS Group pwWebSpeak Plus The Productivity Works Pythia Appian Interactive QuickScape Quickscape Santa's Browser Branded Browser Technologies SimulBrowse Seaglass Software SiteKiosk ProVisio GmbH SlipKnot MicroMind Softerm Plus Softronics SuperHighway Browser Frontier Technologies Surfin' Annette SpyCatcher SurfMonkey MediaLive Talking Browser WeMedia Talva Document Explorer Talva Tango Multilingual Alis Technologies The Other Browser-Emailer Pixelogic UdiWWW Bernd Richter Video On Line Browser Video On Line Voyager VaporWare WannaBe David T. Pierson Web-O-Matic Digital Browser Circle Group Internet, Inc. Web SurfACE ToolPool Web-Talkit Grover Industries WebExplorer IBM WebProwler MacroByte WebRacer Software Savvy Websurfer NetManage WebTV Viewer WebTV Networks WebView South Pacific Information Services WebWhacker Blue Squirrel Wildcat Navigator Harmony International WinWEB TradeWave (EINet) WorldWideWeb (Nexus) Tim Berners-Lee Not just Internet Explorer / Netscape…..

  13. But even if they did…. • …..more than 30 versions of each • 2.0 – 6.x • Widely different adherence to standards both within and between

  14. Everyone has a right to equivalent chances Ethical http://www.eypd2003.org

  15. Remember disabled is not less able • Watch the following video clip • Blind user • Using JAWS screen reader • Using refreshable Braille output device • Filling out Inland Revenue online Self Assessment tax forms (beta site not that accessible).

  16. Disabled is not less able Hands up who can do similar things all at once? • Entering data and navigating – right hand • Feeling output (checking input) – left hand • Listening to output (checking input) – left ear • Talking on phone – right ear

  17. …they just do things differently 300 words per minute!

  18. Legal • European: • Toward a barrier - free Europe (2000) , the European Commission • September 2001, the Commission adopted a Communication on improving the accessibility of public websites • Individual country, e.g. UK • Disability Discrimination Act (1995 - UK) • Disability Rights Commission code of practice (Feb 2002 - UK) • Section 508 rehabilitation act (2001 - USA) – likely that new legislation will be similar to this • Internet test cases: • NFB v AOL (out of court settlement - Title III of the ADA) • McGuire v Australian Olympic Commission (successful suit under Commonwealth DDA 1992) • More on the way

  19. An accessiblity primer

  20. Accessibility 1 Not just ‘catering’ for the disabled • Anyone, • Anywhere, • Any equipment

  21. Accessibility 2 It has a technical aspect HTML 4.01 XHTML 1.0 XML XSLT SMIL 2.0 SAMI Flash MX VRML MathML SVG…

  22. ? Accessibility 3 Needs human intervention to give appropriate meaning “Photo of earth from space” “” “Dense clouds cover most of South America” “Information on outer space”

  23. Accessibility 4 Requires appreciation of wider issues Go to <Vital Page> by clicking the red apple

  24. Accessibility 5 ‘True accessibility’ demands good usability • Bad usability creates problems for all users but impacts on those with special needs even more.

  25. How to achieve accessibility A VERY brief introduction

  26. General accessibility themes • The web is an ‘information medium’ • Graceful transformation • Separate content (& structure) from presentation… • Understandable, navigable content… • Alternative pages/sections only as last resort…

  27. Follow the standards… • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) • Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) • Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 – WCAG 1.0 • - 13 Guidelines • 65 categorised checkpoints • http://www.w3c.org/WAI

  28. WCAG - Drawbacks Following the guidelines can be problematic: • Very technical …so can be difficult to follow • Guidelines can be vague… …or overly prescriptive • Often recommend use of technologies not yet fully supported …also now out of date

  29. WAI checkpoint priority levels • [Priority 1] A Web content developer must satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups will find it impossible to access information in the document. • [Priority 2] A Web content developer should satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups will find it difficult to access information in the document.. • [Priority 3] A Web content developer may address this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups will find it somewhat difficult to access information in the document.

  30. 5 Things to check on your site • All images have appropriate alternative text • Colour alone is not used to highlight information • Hyperlinks are appropriate – no “click here” • Pages don’t break when text size is increased • Everything can be done with the keyboard as well as the mouse …there are many more things but these should send you on your way

  31. How to really ensure accessibility • Audit your site for accessibility • Against the 65 WAI checkpoints • Can be assisted with automatic checkers (caution DO NOT rely on these alone). • Specialist audit • There are a number of consultancies, Bunnyfoot being one of them • Test your site with people with special needs • It’s a ‘sharp tool’ for improving the usability of your site for everyone

  32. Examples of good and bad accessibility • Video clips from user testing sessions.(not included in handout)

More Related