1 / 14

IE² Partnership Model

IE² Partnership Model. Students. Schools. Students. State. Local System. Strategic Plan. Students. Schools. Strategic Plan. Strategic Plan. Students. Strategic Plan. IE² Partnership Model. Contract Model “Charter”. Contract Model “C”. State. Local System’s

caron
Download Presentation

IE² Partnership Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IE²Partnership Model Students Schools Students State Local System Strategic Plan Students Schools Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Students Strategic Plan

  2. IE²Partnership Model Contract Model “Charter” Contract Model “C” State Local System’s Strategic Plan Contract Model “B” Local System’s Strategic Plan Local System’s Strategic Plan Local System’s Strategic Plan Local System’s Strategic Plan Local System’s Strategic Plan Contract Model “A” Contract Model “QBE”

  3. Partnership Contract ModelsAccountability/Performance/Flexibility Concept High Accountability for Georgia’s Schools:Non-Negotiable • Low Flexibility • QBE Default • High Flexibility • Charter • Contract A • Contract B • Contract C Level of Flexibility Based on Contract Model Chosen and Results Achieved/Performance

  4. Partnership Contract ModelsAccountability/Performance/Flexibility Concept Flexibility Based on Contract Model & Performance • Achievement Measures: • AYP • Graduation Rate • Promotion Rate • EOCT • SAT • AP • Percent exceeding grade-level performance on state assessments • Writing Assessments • Local system initiatives • ??? QBE Default Contract A Contract B Contract C Charter

  5. Strategic Plan Process Step 1: System writes 3-year strategic plan and chooses a contract model Step 2: Plan submitted to the appropriate state agencyStep 3: Meeting between state agency and chair of peer review panel to discuss agency recommendations, documents Step 4: State agency sends electronic plan to peer review team Step 5: Chair of peer review team has conversation with system superintendent about upcoming process Step 6: Peer review team has 1-2 day meeting at system

  6. Step 1: Develop 3-year strategic plan and choose a contract model • Uses electronic template on the web • Includes less narrative, more focused on data • Shows system baseline data, targets, and trends

  7. Step 2: Plan submitted to the appropriate state agency • State agency reviews and prepares plan for peer review process • State agency works with system to issue recommendation of plan to peer review team • State agency assigns peer review team to system for 3-year period • Members of team:Chair, local school superintendent System curriculum directorHigh performance principal Other/alternate members as neededSchool finance expertBusiness/parent representativeStaff representative (state agency) GDOE staff member

  8. Step 3: Meeting between state agency and Chair of peer review panel to discuss agency recommendations, documentsStep 4: State agency sends electronic plan to peer review teamStep 5: Chair of peer review team has conversation with superintendent about upcoming process

  9. Step 6: Peer review team has 1-2 day meeting at System • Peer review team meets for instruction/orientation • System gives presentation on plan to peer review team (include leaders of lowest and highest performing schools) • Discussion on goals, plan, and fit between plan and contract model choice • Peer review team gives their recommendation

  10. Rewards/Incentives for Meeting3-Year and Annual Targets • Recognition as “District with Distinction” in particular size level (i.e. Class A, AA, etc.) • Publication of recognition as stated above • Hold an annual “best of” conference where successful districts share their winning strategies. State pays for attendance. • Use successful districts as models for teaching videos.

  11. Consequences • Prior to consequences, ensure no extenuating circumstances prevented system from reaching targets • Convert low-performing school in system to charter school and state appoints board • System withholds some flexibility from particular school(s) • Label the district(i.e. “Probationary District”)

  12. Schedule

  13. General Concepts of Model • Education should constitute a certain percentage of the state’s budget. • Total amount of dollars will fluctuate depending on the economy. • All systems will receive the same per-pupil funding. • If a system chooses a contract model with more flexibility, they will have flexibility over how they spend their dollars. (High accountability and high flexibility)

  14. Models • Default– QBE • Charter System • Model A • Model B • Model C These have varying amounts of accountability/flexibility.

More Related