1 / 33

Implementation of the EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME

Implementation of the EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME with the collaboration of S. Bouallala (ADEME), P. Coddeville (EMD), P. Laj (LaMP/CNRS). General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy. A “level” approach: levels 1 and 2 = mandatory requirements

carrieforrest
Download Presentation

Implementation of the EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation of the EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME with the collaboration of S. Bouallala (ADEME), P. Coddeville (EMD), P. Laj (LaMP/CNRS)

  2. General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy A “level” approach: • levels 1 and 2 = mandatory requirements • level 3 = a voluntary component

  3. General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy A “level” approach: • levels 1 and 2 = mandatory requirements • level 3 = a voluntary component Recommendations for each level: • a suggested number of sites • a list of parameters • a minimum time resolution • a reference methodology

  4. General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy • The French “official” EMEP network (MERA) coordinated by the ADEME (Agency for Environment and Energy Management) in place of the Ministry of Environment standard methodologies and adequate quality assurance procedures • Collaborations with other programmes and researchers

  5. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP • inorganic compounds = 8 • Ozone = 8 • heavy metals (prec) = 4 • PM (mass) = 4  A large country a lot of stations suggested

  6. REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) DONON (775 m) MORVAN (620 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m) MONTANDON (836 m) MONFRANC (810 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) IRATY (1 300 m) The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP • inorganic compounds = 8= 9 (+1) • Ozone = 8 • heavy metals (prec) = 4 • PM (mass) = 4 actual number

  7. REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) DONON (775 m) MORVAN (620 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m) MONTANDON (836 m) MONFRANC (810 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) IRATY (1 300 m) The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP • inorganic compounds = 8= 9 (+1) • Ozone = 8= 8 (+1) • heavy metals (prec) = 4 • PM (mass) = 4 actual number

  8. REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) DONON (775 m) MORVAN (620 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m) MONTANDON (836 m) MONFRANC (810 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) IRATY (1 300 m) The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP • inorganic compounds = 8= 9 (+1) • Ozone = 8= 8 (+1) • heavy metals (prec) = 4= 1 • PM (mass) = 4 actual number

  9. REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) DONON (775 m) MORVAN (620 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m) MONTANDON (836 m) MONFRANC (810 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) IRATY (1 300 m) The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Number of monitoring sites for France: suggested by EMEP • inorganic compounds = 8= 9 (+1) • Ozone = 8= 8 (+1) • heavy metals (prec) = 4 = 1 • PM (mass) = 4 = 0 actual number

  10. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring requirements:

  11. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring requirements: X 8 X 4 technical and financial difficulties

  12. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring actual situation:

  13. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs:

  14. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs:  AbSO2 replaced by Filter packs • 2 stations equiped in 2004 • measurement of (NH3+NH4+) • twice a week frequency

  15. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs:  Should be implemented in 2005 in 2 stations

  16. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs: • Not the main issue in France, low levels • Technical and cost difficulties 1 station with a 2 weeks time resolution 

  17. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 1 sites Monitoring needs: PM = 1st priority … but: • gravimetric method: difficult + expensive • need of NRT data (PM obs & forecasts on www.prevair.org) monitors 

  18. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Number of monitoring “super-sites” for France: suggested by EMEP • acid and eutro = 1 • photooxidant = 1 • heavy metals = 1 • POP = 1 • Particulate matter = 1

  19. REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) DONON (775 m) MORVAN (620 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m) MONTANDON (836 m) MONFRANC (810 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) IRATY (1 300 m) The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Number of monitoring “super-sites” for France: suggested by EMEP • acid and eutro = 1 • photooxidant = 1= 3 • heavy metals = 1 • POP = 1 • Particulate matter = 1 actual number

  20. REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) DONON (775 m) MORVAN (620 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m) MONTANDON (836 m) MONFRANC (810 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) IRATY (1 300 m) The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Number of monitoring “super-sites” for France: suggested by EMEP • acid and eutro = 1 • photooxidant = 1= 3 • heavy metals = 1= 1 • POP = 1 • Particulate matter = 1 actual number

  21. REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) DONON (775 m) MORVAN (620 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m) MONTANDON (836 m) MONFRANC (810 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) IRATY (1 300 m) The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Number of monitoring “super-sites” for France: suggested by EMEP • acid and eutro = 1 = 0 • photooxidant = 1= 3 • heavy metals = 1= 1 • POP = 1 = 0 • Particulate matter = 1 = 0 actual number

  22. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Monitoring requirements

  23. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Monitoring actual situation

  24. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Monitoring needs

  25. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites  Monitoring needs will be implemented in 2005

  26. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites  denuder-filterpack tested: • difficult to apply • expensive Monitoring needs

  27. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 2 sites Monitoring needs technical and financial difficulties 

  28. The EMEP ”level” approach: level 3 sites Parameters suggested to be monitored: • dry deposition flux of S and N species • dry deposition flux of O3 • hydrocarbons C6-C12 (C6-C9) • NOy chemistry • speciation of OC • BC measurements • particle size/number distribution • aerosol optical depth • vertical profiles of O3 and aerosols • Hg speciation • congener-specific POPs • multi-compartment POPs and Hg

  29. REVIN (390 m) LA HAGUE (133 m) DONON (775 m) MORVAN (620 m) LA TARDIERE (143 m) MONTANDON (836 m) MONFRANC (810 m) LE CASSET (1 750 m) PEYRUSSE VIEILLE (236 m) IRATY (1 300 m) The EMEP ”level” approach: level 3 sites Parameters already measured in French EMEP stations: • dry deposition flux of S and N species • dry deposition flux of O3 • hydrocarbons C6-C12 (C6-C9) • NOy chemistry • speciation of OC • BC measurements • particle size/number distribution • aerosol optical depth • vertical profiles of O3 and aerosols • Hg speciation • congener-specific POPs • multi-compartment POPs and Hg

  30. General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy The EMEP new strategy for France is extremely ambitious (many sites and super-sites) • The French “official” EMEP network(MERA) a lot is already done or will be done in a near future impossible to meet all the requirements (too much human and financial ressources) • Collaborations with other programmes and researchers

  31. General structure of the EMEP new monitoring strategy The EMEP new strategy for France is extremely ambitious (many sites and super-sites) • The French “official” EMEP network (MERA) a lot is already done or will be done in a near future impossible to meet all the requirements (too much human and financial ressources) • Collaborations with other programmes and researchers

  32. DONON (775 m) PUYS DE DOME (1465m) PIC DU MIDI (2877m) Collaborations with other programmes and researchers PAES research programme (CNRS/ADEME) • dry deposition flux of S and N species • dry deposition flux of O3 • hydrocarbons C6-C12 (C6-C9) • NOy chemistry • speciation of OC • BC measurements • particle size/number distribution • aerosol optical depth • vertical profiles of O3 and aerosols • Hg speciation • congener-specific POPs • multi-compartment POPs and Hg + O3, PM mass, meteo PAES

  33. GAW OSPAR Collaborations with other programmes and researchers French contributions to international programmes • GAW • OSPAR • ...

More Related