1 / 25

Confronting Codified Sexism Chile

Latin American Law. Confronting Codified Sexism Chile. Last updated 08 Nov 10. Schedule. 21-Nov Legal education in LatAm  23-Nov VIRTUAL FRIDAY 28-Nov Oquendo 30-Nov Assignment 28 (corporate law) 5-Dec Visit with Prof Oyarce (Peru) 7-Dec Visit with Prof Reyes ??? .

casper
Download Presentation

Confronting Codified Sexism Chile

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Latin American Law Confronting Codified SexismChile Last updated 08 Nov 10

  2. Schedule • 21-Nov Legal education in LatAm  • 23-Nov VIRTUAL FRIDAY • 28-Nov Oquendo • 30-Nov Assignment 28 (corporate law) • 5-Dec Visit with Prof Oyarce (Peru) • 7-Dec Visit with Prof Reyes ???

  3. Today’s topics • Sexism in Chilean civil code (1857) • Presumption against paternity – father must confess • Illegitimate children come from “depraved ways” • Reform of Chilean civil code (1998) • Pleading burden in paternity suits: “sufficient antecedents to render alleged facts plausible” • Baez Sierra: mere pleading of paternity insufficient • Espinoza Gonzalez: attaching mother’s affidavit insufficient • Presumption for mother in child custody suits • Carracedo Alvarado: “best interests of child”

  4. Value of knowing other legal systems • Model for borrowing • Gain perspective • Discover truths • Impose / power Legalized sexism?

  5. Article 271: “The alleged child’s action [to be considered natural descendant of father] must be based on a public or private instrument in which the father or the mother confesses to paternity or maternity.” Chile’s classic” sexism … How could merely carnal, dubious, and random intercourse, which can in no way guarantee the faithfulness of the degraded woman, establish legitimacy if there has been no corroboration by the father? Andres Bello (1781-1865)

  6. Some Chilean Data 1990 study (Chile) • "women should obey their husbands" M – 55% agree W – 40% agree • "men should participate more actively in housework so that women are able to work“M – 70% agree W – 92% agree • Divorce and separation rates • 0.38 divorces per 1,000 persons (cf US = 5 per 1000) • 8 separations per 1,000 persons (highest in LatAm) • Of nation's 748 judges – 48% women (1991)

  7. Reform of Bello’s code … More than 10% of Chilean babies do not have legally recognized fathers and half of children are born out of wedlock

  8. Civil Code (rev. 1998) Article 196: “The judge shall accept the complaint [regarding an investigation into paternity or maternity] only if it includes sufficient antecedents to render the alleged facts plausible.”

  9. Baez Sierra(Chile Sup Ct 2002) Birth certificate Complaint allegations Espinoza Gonzalez (Chile Sup Ct 2002) Birth certificate Document verifying father’s appearance before Juvenile Court Notarized sworn statement of mother Meet pleading standard?

  10. Obviously, such an assessment should not amount to an a priori pronouncement on the evidence that will be introduced and examined at trial; yet it should not involve the acceptance of any antecedent whatsoever or of any unfounded affirmation by the plaintiff either. According to the law, the antecedent must make plausible or acceptable the facts that underlie the complaint. In other words, it must directly bear upon the account that the plaintiff offers to support of her claim. We cannot agree that she thereby renders her complaint plausible. Otherwise, we would have to accept as plausible any complaint accompanied by this kind of document. This conclusion does not comport with the statute's mandate. Baez Sierra Espinoza Gonzales Antecedent: birth certificate and notarized sworn statement Antecedent: official copy of the birth certificate [student]

  11. Complaint [allegations] How prove paternity? Birth certificate Uniform Parternity Act NCGS 49-14 “Clear, cogent, convincing evidence” Father’s sworn confession Changed attitudes Winslow Taylor Mother’s affidavit Witness affidavit NCGS 8-50.1 “criminal/civil case … blood tests … evidence … taxed as costs” DNA tests (2005 law)

  12. NCGS Chapter 49 (Bastardy) § 49‑14.  Civil action to establish paternity. (a)        The paternity of a child born out of wedlock may be established by civil action at any time prior to such child's eighteenth birthday. (b)        Proof of paternity pursuant to this section shall be by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence. (f)         When a determination of paternity is pending in a IV‑D case, the court shall enter a temporary order for child support upon motion and showing of clear, cogent, and convincing evidence of paternity. For purposes of this subsection, the results of blood or genetic tests shall constitute clear, cogent, and convincing evidence of paternity if the tests show that the probability of the alleged parent's parentage is ninety‑seven percent (97%) or higher. If paternity is not thereafter established, then the putative father shall be reimbursed the full amount of temporary support paid under the order. (g)        Invoices for services rendered for pregnancy, childbirth, and blood or genetic testing are admissible as evidence without requiring third party foundation testimony and shall constitute prima facie evidence of the amounts incurred for the services or for testing on behalf of the child.

  13. What grade does court opinion deserve?

  14. Baez Sierra (2002) Preview: Procedural history Considerations: • Plaintiff argues • Issue: pleading standard? • Purpose of pleading standard • Dictionary definitions of code terms • Birth certificate not enough • Holding: judge could not allow action • Procedure OK: ex proprio motu • Reject cassation appeal Resolution: Reject cassation appeal

  15. Baez Sierra (2002) Preview: Procedural history Considerations: • Plaintiff argues • Issue: pleading standard? • Purpose of pleading standard • Dictionary definitions of code terms • Birth certificate not enough • Holding: judge could not allow action • Procedure OK: ex proprio motu • Reject cassation appeal Resolution: Reject cassation appeal

  16. Sources of law … Constitution Legislation Legislative history Jurisprudence Doctrine Custom Public policy

  17. Paternity andprotection of children … Constitution vs. international Treaty Jim Rodden

  18. Children from Fatherless Homes Account for: 63% of youth suicides US Dept. of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census 71% of pregnant teenagers US Dept. of Health & Human Services 90% of all homeless and runaway children 70% of juveniles in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988 85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders Center for Disease Control 80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26, 1978 71% of all high school dropouts National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers 75% Rainbows for all God`s Children 85% of all youths sitting in prisons Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections 1992 Children from Fatherless Homes Account for:

  19. Child custody –presumption, standard …

  20. Decide the case … • Alexis Angelino • 1988 – born to married parents • 1989 – goes to live with father • 1996 – mother sues for custody • 1996 – Juvenile Court accepts complaint • 2000 – Appeals Court affirms • 2001 – Juvenile Court grants custody to mother • On appeal: • Evidence of mother’s domestic violence • Psychiatric reports on mother’s mental health • Mother handed over Alexis due to her immaturity • Father has emotionally abandoned Alexis • Alexis expresses preference for father

  21. Compare to prior Chilean standard?Is this “best interests of child” standard? Art. 225 “… the mother will take personal charge of the children’s care … both parents may mutually agree to assign personal care of one or more of the children to the father … the judge may designate the other parent to care for the child, if the minor’s interest so demands in cases of abuse, neglect, or other reasonable cause.” Jim Rodden

  22. End

  23. More Chilean Data 2005 study (Corporation Humana and the University of Chile’s Institute of Public Affairs) • 87% of women felt that they suffered discrimination • 95% of women believe that women face discrimination in the labor market • 67% believed that they faced discrimination in politics [consider Michelle Bachelet]. Bianca Hudson Rich McPherson

  24. Convention on the Rights of the ChildGAL ~ SENAMEWhy is the US not signatory? Melinda Hanzel

  25. Bogota, Colombia (average temperature: 50-65 F) 4 Nov 07

More Related