90 likes | 247 Views
Sierra Water Work Group Summit June 2014. The 2014 Water Bond Debate Getting our Fair Share….. Or Not. What’s wrong with this picture ?. 25% of State’s Area 60% + of State’s Developed Water Supply Historically +/- 1% of Dedicated Bond Funds. Water Bond Proposals.
E N D
Sierra Water Work Group SummitJune 2014 The 2014 Water Bond Debate Getting our Fair Share….. Or Not
What’s wrong with this picture? • 25% of State’s Area • 60% + of State’s Developed Water Supply • Historically +/- 1% of Dedicated Bond Funds
Water Bond Proposals • Total Sierra Nevada Share* • 2009 Bond $ 11.14b $ 119m 1% • 2014 Bond Proposals • Rendon AB 1331 $ 8b $ 99m 1.2% • Wolk SB 848 $ 6.83b $ 65m 1% • Perea AB 2686 $ 10.25 $ 94m <1% • Rendon AB 2554 $ 8.5b $ 203m 2.4% • *Sierra Nevada Conservancy and Mt. Counties Overlay
Sierra as the Source • The Sierra is largely unrecognized in policy debates as CA’s primary source of water for communities and farms. • Delta-centric nature of water discussions; majority of freshwater flowing to Delta starts here. • Very little understanding of the relationship between healthy watersheds and water supply, quality, and timing of flows.
Some Positive Steps • Language in AB 2554 recognizes the unique and important role that the Sierra-Cascade area plays and provides funding based on this importance. • Governor’s CA Water Action Plan recognizes needs of source watersheds. • Greater recognition and support from statewide organizations, in particular Trust for Public Land and The Nature Conservancy.
The Need to Invest • Unhealthy Forests and Watersheds • Overgrown forests on public lands • Mercury Contamination in many areas • Many Sierra Meadows are not functioning as natural storage • Working landscapes and natural lands in need of protection • Climate Change • Less snow, more rain • Increased temperatures mean longer, more severe fire seasons