1 / 18

GA Joint Steering Committee

GA Joint Steering Committee. Evolving GA Safety to a Data-Driven & Proactive Process. GA Joint Steering Committee. Evolve GA JSC to a CAST like Model Voluntary commitments Consensus decision-making Data driven risk management Implementation-focused The GA JSC is a means to…

cece
Download Presentation

GA Joint Steering Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GA Joint Steering Committee Evolving GA Safety to a Data-Driven & Proactive Process

  2. GA Joint Steering Committee • Evolve GA JSC to a CAST like Model • Voluntary commitments • Consensus decision-making • Data driven risk management • Implementation-focused • The GA JSC is a means to… Focus Limited Government/Industry Resources to Data Driven Risks and Solutions

  3. What is the CAST model? • Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) • Work began in 1997 after two significant accidents in 1996 (TWA 800 & ValuJet 592) • CAST focus was set by: • White House Commission on Aviation Safety • The National Civil Aviation Review Commission (NCARC) • Opportunity for industry and government to focus resources on one primary aviation safety initiative

  4. General Aviation Joint Steering Committee (GAJSC) Steering Committee Co-Chairs: Bruce Landsberg (AOPA/ASF) Tony Fazio (FAA/AVP) Government - FAA (AFS, AIR, ATO & ARP) - NASA (Research) - NWS Industry - GAMA, EAA, NBAA, NATA, & SAMA • Strategic guidance • Management/Approval of Safety Plan • Provide direction • Membership Outreach • Provides linkage to ASIAS • Identify future areas of study/risk • Charter safety studies • Provide guidance and direction • Draw data from various areas • Develop a prioritized Safety Plan • Develop metrics to measure effectiveness of safety solutions Safety Analysis Team Co-chairs: Corey Stephens (FAA) Jens Hennig(GAMA) Members: FAA, NTSB, AOPA, FSF, UAA, CGAR, FAAST, NAFI, Insurance, Academia, SAFE Working Groups (To include SMEs from various general aviation segments, depending on study) • Data analyses • Safety enhancement • Mitigation development

  5. What is the GA JSC Dataset & the GA Pareto? • GAJSC Accident Data Set Requirements • Report Status: Final • Highest Degree Injury: Fatal • Event Type: Accident • Aircraft Type: Airplane • Flight Conduct Codes: • Part 91 • Part 135, Unscheduled • Part 137 • Public Use • Unknown

  6. GAJSC Pareto CY2001-CY2011Source: NTSB Aviation Accident/Incident Database.Note: 66% and 5% of fatal accidents have been finalized for 2010 and 2011 respectively RECIPROCATING NON-HOMEBUILT 1600 TURBINE HOMEBUILT 2010 PARETO TOTAL 1400 LOC-I – Loss of Control Inflight CFIT – Controlled Flight Into Terrain 1200 SCF-PP – System Component Failure-Powerplant LALT – Low Altitude Operations 1000 UNK – Unknown or Undetermined OTHR– Other FUEL – Fuel Related 800 SCF-NP – System Component Failure-Non-Powerplant MAC – Midair Collisions WSTRW – Windshear or Thunderstorm 600 400 200 0 LOC-I CFIT SCF-PP LALT OTHR UNK FUEL SCF-NP MAC WSTRW

  7. GA JSC Working Group (WG) Process • WGs to be formed based on risk (example: Loss of Control - LOC) • Broad-based teams (20-30 specialists /team) • Teams can be divided by aircraft or operation type (example: turbine, reciprocating and homebuilt reciprocating/turbine) • Detailed event sequence - problem identification from US accidents and incidents

  8. GA JSC Working Group Process • WGs to develop mitigations based on problems found and build Detailed Implementations Plans (DIPs) • DIPs will describe each mitigation and explain steps to implementation • Groups are identified for leadership and metrics are developed • DIPs then go to the SAT for resource/benefit evaluation

  9. GA JSC SAT Process • SAT identifies the most effective solutions derived from all accident categories • Considers effectiveness vs. resources • Tests solutions against other fatal accidents • Creates draft master strategic safety plan • Plan is submitted to GA JSC for approval

  10. GA JSC SAT Process • Once plan is approved, industry and government begin implementation • SAT will track implementation schedules and levels (are mitigations on time and at levels we were expecting) • SAT will work to track effectiveness of the mitigations in place • SAT will identify and recommend areas for future study/mitigation

  11. GA JSC LOC Working Group

  12. SE-1 - AOA – New Designs SE-2 - AOA – Existing Fleet SE-3 - ADM SE-5 - Transition Training SE-6 - LODA SE-7 - Simple Procedures SE-8 – Training (SE-4 & 8) SE-9 - SOP Pt91 positioning legs, FRAT & SMS SE-10 - Stab App & Landing Training & Guidance SE-12 - Remote Airfield Cameras SE-13 - WX Technologies SE 14 - Engine Monitoring SE-15 - RX Medication Effects SE 16 - Medical Records SE-17 - Improve Communication between AMEs and Pilots SE-21 - Risk Based Review SE-22 - GA FOQA SE-23 - EAB Flight Test SE-24 - Single Pilot CRM SE-25 - Reducing Regulatory Roadblocks for New Technologies SE-26 - Part 23 Re-org SE-27 - Part 21 Review GA JSC Approved Safety Enhancements

  13. REACTIVE PROACTIVE Two Paths Toward Improving Safety… GA Safety • Accident Investigation • Historical Accident Analysis/Review • Flight Operations Quality Assurance • Pilot Reporting • SMS

  14. GA JSC: Forensic and Proactive Work • GA JSC will conduct forensic analysis of accidents – “reactive” • Detailed analysis of past fatal accidents • Mitigations developed and tracked • Universities have helped develop methodologies • As the forensic work is being completed, the “proactive” work can begin (ASIAS) • Government and Industry initiative on data sharing & analysis • Discover safety concerns before accidents or incidents occur • Will lead to timely mitigation and prevention • FDM work by AVP & CGAR universities will play an important part in this work

  15. A collaborative Government and Industry initiative on datasharing & analysisto proactively discover safety concerns before accidentsor incidents occur, leading to timely mitigationand prevention. What isASIAS…. 15

  16. Data Sources Supporting ASIAS Studies • ASAP • FOQA • ATSAP • Manufacturers data • Avionics data • Traffic Management Reroutes and Delays • Airport Configuration and Operations • Sector and Route Structure • Procedures • Surveillance Data forEn Route, Terminal and Airport ATC Information Proprietary Data Safety Data • Aviation Safety Reporting System • Runway Incursion • Surface Incident • Operational Error / Operational Deviation • Pilot Deviation • Vehicle or Pedestrian Deviation • National Transportation Safety Board • FAA Accident/Incident Data System • FAA Service Difficulty Reports Other Information • Bureau of Transportation Statistics • Weather / Winds

  17. Summary: GA JSC, SAT & WGs Moving Forward • History shows focused action and introduction of new capabilities have led to accident risk reductions • Joint industry and government teams working together to a common goal can further enhance the safety of our very safe aviation system • Full implementation will require a coordinated effort between industry and government • The GA JSC is moving forward to meet the challenge

  18. Questions?

More Related