1 / 26

Marine Hydrocarbon Seep Capture

Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. Marine Hydrocarbon Seep Capture. Feasibility and Potential Impacts Santa Barbara, California. What are “Seeps?”. Seep Environment biogeochemistry & ecology. Seeps release between 80,000 to 200,000 m 3 of gas per day

cecily
Download Presentation

Marine Hydrocarbon Seep Capture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Marine Hydrocarbon Seep Capture Feasibility and Potential Impacts Santa Barbara, California

  2. What are “Seeps?”

  3. Seep Environmentbiogeochemistry & ecology • Seeps release between 80,000 to 200,000 m3 of gas per day • Mostly methane with trace amounts of toxics • Most toxics and hydrocarbons disperse and/or biodegrade • Bacteria metabolize seep hydrocarbons

  4. Seep Environmentair quality • Primary component is methane • Contributes to global warming • Seep gas contains reactive organic gases (ROGs) • Ozone (O3) is a serious health concern ROG + NOXhv O3

  5. Significance • Capturing natural seep hydrocarbons might reduce local air pollution • Recent CA energy crisis renewed interest in capturing this seepage as a potential “green” source of natural gas

  6. Seep Tents? Source: http://seeps.geol.ucsb.edu/

  7. Research Approach • Interdisciplinary approach to evaluate a potential seep tent project’s • Impacts on water quality and marine ecology • Effects on air quality • Regulatory obstacles and requirements • Economic costs and benefits

  8. Seep Flux Varies in Space & Time

  9. Environmental Impact marine impacts • Impacts on soft bottom sediments • Recovery from disturbance is quick • Tent installation • Short-term: One-time impacts to seafloor communities • Long-term: Undetectable impacts • Pipeline • Short/Long-term: Possible ecosystem level impacts if piping is not placed sufficiently far from critical habitats (kelp beds)

  10. Environmental Impact ozone production • Magnitude of seep contribution to ozone formation varies depending on: • Climate • Levels of ROGs & NOx

  11. Environmental Impact ozone production model • Relates seep gas emissions to ozone formation (reactivity) • Estimates the change in ozone associated with seep gas capture

  12. Seep Gas Composition & Contribution to Ozone Production Volume (%)

  13. Environmental Impact ozone production model • Estimates the change in ozone associated with seep gas capture • Results • Seeps account for 5.1% of SB ozone • 1st seep tent reduces 0.8 to 0.4% of County ozone annually

  14. Regulatory Requirements processing facility Current regulatory obstacles limit development or use of onshore gas processing facility • Measure A96 requires county voter approval of onshore infrastructure for offshore projects • Coastal Act: new facilities not developed unless existing facilities used at maximum capacity • Existing facility: Ellwood Oil and Gas Processing Facility currently under-utilized, but designated as non-conforming land use

  15. Regulatory Requirements emission reduction credits • Credit worth $4,000/ton ROGs reduced • Unlikely for 2 reasons: • Difficult to prove tents would permanently reduce ROGs • Seeps are natural source of ROGs • Credits for seep tents would be an exception

  16. Cost-Benefit Analysis approach • Compare costs of seep tents to gas sales revenue and health benefits • Integrated model: • Gas price forecast • Project cost estimates • Ozone reduction • Health benefit or emission reduction credits Profit =Gas Sales Revenue- Costs+ Credits Social Value = Gas Sales Revenue - Costs + Health Benefit

  17. Cost-Benefit Analysis natural gas price forecast • Predict natural gas prices to determine project revenues • Best forecast is $2.45 per 1000 cubic feet (MCF)

  18. Cost-Benefit Analysis project costs Project costs: • Capital & design • Piping • Maintenance

  19. Cost-Benefit Analysis health benefit valuation • Monetary value of improved health from ozone reduction • Benefits-transfer approach • Best estimate = $2.1 million • Large effect on project decision • Uncertainty in ozone reduction amount, health improvement, valuation theory

  20. Cost-Benefit Analysis Model most likely scenario

  21. Cost-Benefit Analysis Model most likely scenario

  22. Cost-Benefit Analysis Model scenarios Profit =Gas Sales Revenue- Costs+ Credits Social Value = Gas Sales Revenue - Costs + Health Benefit

  23. Cost-Benefit Analysis Results Under likely project conditions, installing new seep tents NOT practical from social or entrepreneurial viewpoint

  24. Recommendations further research • More precise and complete research into • Chemistry of the Santa Barbara airshed • Marine ecology of the seep field • Use of Santa Barbara County hospital data to derive the exact relationship between illness and ozone

  25. Recommendations policy • Verify precise amount of ozone reduced by seep tents • Revise permit and credit conditions • Institute a socially responsible value for credits • Compare cost effectiveness

  26. Acknowledgements • Advisors: Christopher Costello and Natalie Mahowald • Mel Willis (Ph.D. student advisor) • Peter Cantle (SBCAPCD) • Bruce Luyendyk, Jordan Clark, Libe Washburn, James Boles(UCSB Hydrocarbon Seeps Research Group) • Tom Murphy, Doug Allard, Patricia Holden, Mike Edwards, Steve Sterner, Michelle Pasini, Jim Fredrickson, Sally Holbrook

More Related