1 / 9

Session Objective

Session Objective. Needs and Opportunities for Design, Monitoring and Evaluation for Peacebuilding in CARE. Highlight one approach – Theories of Change. Measuring Peacebuilding Effectiveness. Accountability Lesson Learning Challenges Links between M&E and the Policy Discourse.

cedric
Download Presentation

Session Objective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session Objective • Needs and Opportunities for Design, Monitoring and Evaluation for Peacebuilding in CARE. • Highlight one approach – Theories of Change

  2. Measuring Peacebuilding Effectiveness • Accountability • Lesson Learning • Challenges • Links between M&E and the Policy Discourse

  3. Donor Community • DFID – Value for Money • USAID – Families of TOC • EC – Lesson Learning • Trusts & Foundations

  4. Peacebuilding Design, Monitoring & Evaluation Project Theory of Change Approach (TOC)

  5. We believe that by doing x we will achieve y • If we do______ then ____ will result because ________. • If we provide training to Nepali youth in six districts on non-violent conflict resolution and we engage communities on the importance of the youth’s role in negotiated resolution then the youth will be able to resolve local conflicts in these districts because they will have the skills necessary and people will value their support.

  6. Objectives of the Project • Capacity building of peace practitioners • Create “Tools, Techniques” for reviewing, monitoring and evaluating Theories of Change (TOCs) • Lesson Learning – locally, internationally • Stronger impact of peacebuilding projects. • Donor Advocacy – M&E Effectiveness, Accountability, Responsiveness

  7. Nepal CARE International International Alert Alliance for Peace Ministry of Peace & Reconstruction Youth Action Search for Common Ground Research Teams DRC • International Alert • RFDA • Sofibef • Dynamique Synergie des Femmes (DSF) • Caucus des Femmes Uganda • CARE International • International Alert • DED/ Teso Initiative for Peace (TIP) , Justice and Peace Commission • Kabarole Research Centre (KRC) • The African PACT TAP • Makerere University, Dept of Peace & Conflict Studies • World Vision

  8. Project Feedback Mechanisms • Best practice in peacebuilding DM&E will be codified and disseminated. • Specific papers and policy briefs • Tools and techniques are to be shared with peace practitioners, donors, and development CSOs • Roundtable discussions – locally, Brussels, London • Addressing Policy for Evaluation, Transparency of funding, Coordination, and Flexibility

  9. Defining project TOC versus a prepared list • Difficulties with project defining own: indicators could be insufficient; requires additional information collection; and tension with time, capacity, etc. • Positive about defining own: contextualised, specific, lessons confusion (USAID example), avoids ticking the box, etc.

More Related