140 likes | 299 Views
CIC E-Publishing Venture. COC-11 Portland, Oregon April 19, 2002 Tom Peters. Chicago Illinois Indiana Iowa Michigan Michigan State. Minnesota Northwestern Ohio State Penn State Purdue Wisconsin-Madison. CIC Member Universities. The Problem.
E N D
CIC E-Publishing Venture COC-11 Portland, Oregon April 19, 2002Tom Peters
Chicago Illinois Indiana Iowa Michigan Michigan State Minnesota Northwestern Ohio State Penn State Purdue Wisconsin-Madison CIC Member Universities
The Problem • North American publishing: $25 billion industry with a 0.1 percent growth rate in 2001. • 92 university presses had $408 million in sales in 2001 (1.6 % of all North American book sales).In 1999, they had nearly $412 million in sales. • University presses publish 10-15 percent of all new book titles each year. • Marshall Poe’s assessment of the situation.
Opportunities: Why Are We Doing This? • We see mainstream opportunities for new types of scholarly communication and e-publishing. • Traditional scholarly publishing is experiencing severe fiscal constraints. • For-profit quasi-scholarly e-book aggregators are not meeting all our needs.
Why Are We Doing This? (cont.) • One strength of the CIC: infrastructure to facilitate collaboration among various campus units. • (To avoid replicating the situation where large for-profit publishers control large chunks of scholarly publishing.)
CIC E-Publishing Venture • A cooperative, consortial e-publishing prototype being developed by the libraries and presses at 11 CIC member universities. • The prototype will include approx. 55 scholarly frontlist books from the 11 presses. • The project could expand to include other types of scholarly content.
Core Assumptions • If we build it, scholars and students will come and use it. • Libraries and presses bring complementary areas of expertise. • Students and scholars want and need e-content in multiple file formats.
Core Assumptions (cont.) • E-content is related to p-content • E-sales may cannibalize p-sales • E-sales may complement p-sales • E-content may stimulate p-sales (NAP) • The relationship between e-sales and p-sales will evolve over time. • Facilitate the “will to read in print”
General Goals and Hypotheses • Sales will be primarily to libraries and consortia, but perhaps also to individuals. • One access route will be the existing CIC Virtual Electronic Library (VEL). • Recover the direct costs.
Phase 1 Goals • A working prototype for searching, distributing, and presenting scholarly e-books. • A scalable, sustainable business model for the worldwide distribution of this content. • (Can this group of presses and libraries collaborate in this manner?)
Possible Revenue Rivulets • Sales to libraries and consortia • Discounts for: • CIC member libraries • Consortia • Two-year colleges • School libraries and public libraries? • Sales to individuals • SRDP and/or POD?
Possible Revenue Rivulets • Separate Pricing for: • The entire aggregated content • Content clusters • By topic • By publisher • By type of publication • Coursepacks and other repurposing and reorganization of the content • Links to press sales catalogs and OPACs
Questions • Federation of not-for-profit scholarly e-publishing ventures? • What changes in the production process? • How should research universities undertake e-publishing? • Impact of Open Archives Initiative, Public Library of Science, Budapest Open Access Initiative, and others?
Tom PetersCommittee on Institutional Cooperation302 E. John StreetSuite 1705Champaign IL 61820tpeters@cic.uiuc.edu(217) 244-9239www.cic.uiuc.edu Contact Information