400 likes | 577 Views
MURI Team Experience in EM Penetration and Coupling. Pieces. MURI Team Experience. Wires, Apertures, Conducting Surfaces. Wire through hole in conducting screen Wire excited through aperture in conducting screen Penetration through arrays of slots
E N D
Wires, Apertures, Conducting Surfaces • Wire through hole in conducting screen • Wire excited through aperture in conducting screen • Penetration through arrays of slots • Wire-to-wire coupling through slot in screen
LIME excitation of vent slots Figure 5.16. Magnetic current induced in vent slot due to dipole-spot excitation
Penetration into and Radiation from Enclosures through Apertures • Penetration into box via slot in sidewall • Penetration through loaded aperture • Coupling to wire in slotted conducting tube • Coupling to wire in box through slot in wall • Wire in box with slots in sidewall -- EIGER
30 cm y 12 cm z x Ey 30 cm k Rectangular Aperture 20 by 3 cm Electric Field Shielding (dB): Validation of MLFMM code EMCAR Measured at Center of cavity Note that at resonance relative coupling is increased by 20dB as compared to ambient field
Transmission Through Loaded Apertures Transmission vs. Frequency Transmission vs. Incidence Angle
0.6 m - + 0.36 m 0.4 m Results Normalized output current for a 1 V source • EIGER (preliminary results) • Measurement (IEEE Trans. EMC, May 1994, pp. 144 -146)
Accurate Methods—Assurance of Accuracy • Penetration into slotted rectangular tube – 2D • Coupling to probe in nose cone of “mock” missile
Weak Penetration Study Far-zone electric field due to the probe inside mock missile with partially closed nose cone: hc= 14.6 cm, hb= 118.7 cm, a= 0.0787 cm, b= 7.875 cm, c= 0.2286 cm, d= 4.25 cm, e= 3.1 cm.
Penetration into Buildings • Penetration through composite wall – concrete with rebar “shield” • Composite transfer function
Modeling of EM Field Penetration into Buildings • Simple models for field penetrations into complex facility walls have been developed, using previously measured data Computed Transmission (dB) Measured Transmission
Modeling of EM Field Penetration into Buildings (con’t.) • Example of the transfer functions for a rebar shield alone, one and two layers of concrete (each 0.102 m thick with er = 1, mr = 1, s = 0.1 S/m), and the composite rebar/concrete shield.
Time Domain Methods, Fast Methods • Penetration through curved slots • Fast time domain integral equation (TDIE) methods–penetration into enclosures • “Low frequency” considerations of TDIE • Accommodate nonlinear loads • Finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods
Fast TDIE analysis: EMC of enclosures Rapid time domain analysis of motherboards/cards, (partial) enclosure, pins,… • Approx. 10K spatial unknowns • Broadband analysis = 2 hours
20 cm 10 cm 5 cm 15 cm 1 cm 4.5 cm 17.5 cm 25 cm 25 cm 30 cm 30 cm Fast TDIE analysis: EMC of enclosures (Cont) • Ventilation slot emissions Power (dBmW) f (GHz) Radiated power for different configurations Chassis + motherboard + cards
Fast TDIE analysis: low frequency aspects • Rapid time domain analysis of motherboards with traces, cables, gaps, etc • Approx. 3K spatial unknowns • Broadband analysis = 30 mins • Using stable TDIE schemes • Galerkin testing in time (Nedelec / Volakis) • Loop star decompositions • Contrary to FDTD: no timestep limitation (CFL >>> 1)
Excitation fmax = 1 GHz • at fmax = 0.3 m • ds at fmax = /300 /10 Fast TDIE analysis: low frequency aspects (Con’t.) Comparison of computed |S21| to the measured result* NA 30 cm 20 cm 2mm
Magnitude (kV) Voltage (kV) Current (kA) varistors Fast TDIE analysis: nonlinear circuitry • We have developed a capability for analyzing lumped nonlinear elements in within TDIE framework. Voltage on the varistor 5 m 0.02 m 0.1 m 500 500
Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Modeling • Investigation of EM fields radiated from a localized source inside a buried facility Problem Geometry3-Dimensional FDTD Model
Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) Modeling (Con’t.) Tangential E-field at earth surface at t = 65.8 ns Radiated E-field in far zone
The Exterior Problem, Fast Frequency Domain Methods • Leakage of field from exterior to interior through cracks, seams, and holes • Leakage of field from exterior to interior through antennas • Fast frequency domain methods (FD) for “massive problems”
Airborne Transmitter Lightening PEDS Ground-based or ship-board Transmitter EMI Threat to Aircraft Systems Picture from NASA-Langley External Threat Internal Threat • Coupling from other Aircraft Systems • Natural Environmental Effects • (Lightening, Static Electricity) • Man Made Sources External to the aircraft • (High Intensity Radiated Fields - HIRF) • Portable Electronic Devices (PEDS) carried by passengers
Coupling through Antennas • Antennas are ‘doors’ to coupling from external excitations into the aircraft, tanks, missiles, ships, control centers, etc. • For coupling studies, details such as wires, feed structures and loadings are crucial