190 likes | 420 Views
Global Imbalances and their Role in the Global Financial Crisis. By John J. Maughan. Global Imbalances - Current Accounts. Obstfeld & Rogoff 2010. Global Imbalances - History. Spanish gold and silver hoarding – chronic deficits British silver drain in Far East – gunboat diplomacy
E N D
Global Imbalances and their Role in the Global Financial Crisis By John J. Maughan
Global Imbalances - Current Accounts Obstfeld & Rogoff 2010
Global Imbalances - History • Spanish gold and silver hoarding – chronic deficits • British silver drain in Far East – gunboat diplomacy • Interwar gold standard • German balance of payments • Piecemeal devalations in 1930s
Global Imbalances – Me Bad? • “Good”imbalances • High savings for education, social security, etc. • High investment due to real productivity increases • High portfolio investment through deep and liquid financial markets • “Bad” imbalances • Domestic market distortions – high and low savings • Systemic distortions – global large surpluses, reserves
Global Imbalances and Crisis Three ways imbalances could be bad news: • “Disruptive adjustment” or protectionism • Product of common causes • Global liquidity imbalances Global financial crisis shifted concern to implications of global imbalances
Up to the Crisis: 1995-2003 • Asian financial crisis -> trade surpluses, high savings, large dollar reserves • US dot-com boom -> domestic and foreign investment, lower US savings, stronger dollar, equity gains • Commodity price boom -> higher US deficit • US dot-com bust -> monetary loosening, falling interest rates (real and policy) • Rising real estate values -> shift from equity to real estate after dot-com bust, US savings do not increase
Up to the Crisis: 2004-2008 A “new and more dangerous phase.” Four factors: • Commodity price boom -> higher US trade deficit • US expansionary monetary policy -> low policy interest rates, low inflation, high liquidity, cheap credit • China’s rise -> low inflation on goods, high savings, dollar reserves, finance cheap US credit • US financial innovation -> cheap and easy US credit, EU demand, inflated housing prices
Commodity Price Boom Obstfeld & Rogoff 2010
Cheap Credit in the US of A Obstfeld & Rogoff 2010
Cheap Credit in the US of A Obstfeld & Rogoff 2010
China’s Rise - Trade Surplus Obstfeld & Rogoff 2010
China’s Rise - Reserves Obstfeld & Rogoff 2010
US Financial Innovation Obstfeld & Rogoff 2010
Key Causal Factors 1-5 • Low global real interest rates. Effect: lower US interest rates. • Low inflation. Effect: lower US interest rates, higher credit availability, more spending on real estate. • Low US interest rates (both policy and real). Effect: inflated leverage and housing bubbles. • Rising US housing values, uninterrupted by Asian financial crisis or dot-com bust. Effect: entrenched expectations of housing appreciation, inflated housing bubble. • US dollar. Effect: upward pressures lead to cheaper foreign borrowing and expansionary monetary policy (to reduce current account deficit).
Key Causal Factor 6-10 • China et al. high savings. Effect: lower global real interest rates. (High savings rate fuelled primarily by young and old for housing and social security, respectively. See Chamon et al. 2011.) • China et al. trade surpluses. Effect: higher dollar reserves. • China & Asia incoming FDI. Effect: higher dollar reserves. • Deflation in Japan. Effect: more expansionary monetary policy to combat low inflation. • High commodity prices. Effect: increased global savings, larger global trade surplus, greater US deficit, and higher dollar reserves.
Key Blame Factors 1-4 • US expansionary monetary policy. Effect: lower US interest rates. • US poor financial regulation. Effect: higher US housing values, inflated leverage and housing bubbles. • US politics. Effect: postpone tough policy decision to reduce fiscal deficit, lower foreign borrowing, and rebalance trade. • China politics. Effect: postpone tough policy decision to rebalance economy by appreciating currency, reducing reserves, and relying more on domestic demand for growth.
Key Blame Factors 5-7 • China et al. dollar pegs or managed floats. Effect: larger trade surpluses. • China et al. dollar reserves. Effect: stronger US dollar, leading to both cheaper foreign borrowing and decreased US terms of trade, which in turn leads to further monetary loosening. • EU regulatory arbitrage. Effect: increased demand for US structured investments.
Policy Recommendations • US should increase private and public saving– former has largely been achieved. • China et al. should attempt to reduce their savings rates by relying more on domestic demand and providing social services. • Will greatly reduce global imbalances, but will be politically painful.