1 / 16

The Title I, Part D Application Process

The Title I, Part D Application Process. Chandra Martin Arkansas Department of Education.

chava-mendoza
Download Presentation

The Title I, Part D Application Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TheTitle I, Part D ApplicationProcess Chandra Martin Arkansas Department of Education

  2. WHO’S AFFECTED?ONLY those school districts with delinquent facilities in their boundaries, DYS facilitiesthat receive Title I, Part D funds, and Department of Correction facilities that house inmates under the age of 18.

  3. Federal Programs Title I – Part D, Subpart 2 Delinquent Facilities 2012-2013 Bergman Arkansas Baptist Boys Ranch Fayetteville AmiCare of Fayetteville (formally Piney Ridge) Batesville North Arkansas Youth Center Green County Tech Children’s Home Inc. Springdale Youth Bridge Piney Ridge Osceola Woodridge (formally Piney Ridge) Fulton Randolph Clay Benton Carroll Baxter Boone Marion Izard Sharp Greene Lawrence Madison Washington Newton Searcy Craighead Mississippi Stone Independence County Line Western Arkansas Youth Services (WAYS) Poinsett Crawford Johnson Van Buren Cleburne Jackson Nettleton Consolidated Youth Services (CYS) Franklin Pope Cross Crittenden Conway Logan White Woodruff Sebastian Faulkner St. Francis Yell Perry Prairie Scott Lee Pulaski Lonoke Monroe Marion East Arkansas Youth Services (EAYS) Saline Garland Montgomery Phillips Polk Arkansas Hot Spring Grant Jefferson Howard Pike Clark Sevier Dallas Lincoln Mount Ida Deborah Dunston Center Cleveland Desha Forrest City Woodridge (formally Piney Ridge) Hempstead Little River Nevada Ouachita Drew Calhoun Bradley Perryville Glenhaven Youth Ranch Chicot Miller Ashley Lafayette Columbia Union Delinquent Facilities Facilities to be Monitored This Year Hot Springs Ouachita Children’s Center (OCC) Magnolia South Arkansas Youth Services (SAYS) Magnolia South Arkansas Youth Services (SAYS)

  4. Map of DYS facilities

  5. Map of DOC facilities

  6. Major Changes toTitle I, Part D Application • THE APPLICATION: • has an Earlier Deadline: July 31, 2011 • has a New Review Process: Team Review • Will be more Intense; there is a rubric • is a little Longer • More reporting on IDEA and LEP students • More reporting on transition and transitional services • BIGGEST CHANGE: Suggestions are now required!

  7. THE APPLICATION

  8. There are technically no new questions on the application! “If Applicable” is being removed from all questions. All questions must be addressed. Questions are being clarified; Where applicants had the options before, there are no options now. For example: it may have said “include individual OR master schedule”; now it says “include both individual AND master schedules”.

  9. BENEFITsOF THE CHANGES

  10. EARLIER DEADLINE • Applications can be approved earlier in school year; fund distributions can take place earlier • Gives applicants more time to utilize funding • Allows ADE to be more accountable financially to USDOE; • Gives ADE more time for monitoring

  11. NEW APPLICATION FORMAT • Provides ADE with a desk audit tool for monitoring; • Allows ADE to maintain a 100%monitoring rate even in non-monitoring year; • Causes more accountability for facility • Allows ADE to collect more accurate data • Presents a truer picture of Arkansas • Allows ADE to reach a higher level of compliance

  12. New review tool - rubric Provides a uniform way of reviewing the applications; Because it’s read by a team, not an individual, more objective reviews Makes it easy to compare applications; Provides explicit guidelines for applicants; Helps ADE ensure that all required information is collected;

  13. 1. Because it’s read by a team, not an individual, more subjective reviews.2. Alleviates some stressin the Title I, Part D office;  2 MOST IMPORTANT BENFITS

  14. THERUBRIC

  15. The Rubric • Is simple • Has checkboxes for ease of scoring • Is designed where there are no “truly” grey areas • Is designed so that the parts on the application coincide with the sections on the rubric • 3/9 sections will be completed by the Title I office prior to being scored by the readers; one section is actually a bonus section. • Has a cutoff score of 100!

  16. THE END……… PRESENTED BY: Chandra Martin Public School Program Advisor Arkansas Department of Education Four Capitol Mall - # 26 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 683-5424 chandra.martin@arkansas.gov

More Related