1 / 48

II. History and Overview of the Virginia Stormwater Management Act

II. History and Overview of the Virginia Stormwater Management Act. General Stormwater Training Workshop. Topics. Why regulate stormwater ? Review the history of the Stormwater Act Review the impact of the Integration Bill (HB 1065)

chelsa
Download Presentation

II. History and Overview of the Virginia Stormwater Management Act

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. II. History and Overview of the Virginia Stormwater Management Act General Stormwater Training Workshop

  2. Topics • Why regulate stormwater? • Review the history of the Stormwater Act • Review the impact of the Integration Bill (HB 1065) • Review of the important elements and requirements in the law

  3. In the Beginning

  4. The Beginning of Soil (and Water) Conservation

  5. Why regulate Stormwater?

  6. Nutrients Nutrients

  7. First flush

  8. Pollution Pollution P O2 depletion Sediment N Algal bloom Shading Clean Water Shading Impacts Aquatic organisms Human health Human use and enjoyment of the environment

  9. Concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in natural waters, Stormwater and wastewater (expressed in mg/L) ** current technology Note that untreated urban stormwater runoff has about the same concentration as treated wastewater

  10. Runoff Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs) for N and P in an Urban Environment Source: CWP, 2003

  11. Urban Nutrient Loads (are fast becoming a bigger slice of the Bay pie) Year Total N Total P 1985 2% 5% 2000 9% 15% 2009 12% 22% 2030 ???? Urban and suburban runoff into the Chesapeake Bay is the only nutrient load sector where we are seeing reverse progress In load reductions-source OIG (2007)

  12. There are many sources of N and P in the urban environment

  13. Some additional sources of nitrogen in urban runoff include: • Wash-off of fertilizers • Nitrogen attached to eroded soils and streambanks • Organic matter and pet wastes on Impervious Cover

  14. Effect of Eutrophication on Waters • Increased frequency of algal blooms • Increased hypoxia and anoxia • Decline in submersed aquatic plants • Reduced water clarity • Decline in benthic life • Fish kills

  15. Nutrient Enrichment by Stormwater • Most streams have a naturally low phosphorus content (TP) • EPA’s recommendation for TP in natural streams is 0.1 mg/l • P-enriched streams have: • higher biomass • less biological diversity • more bottom algae and rock scum • lower oxygen levels

  16. Impact of development on stream quality

  17. Stream Impacts 8-10% 20% Impervious Cover > 65% In-stream erosion results in the release of nutrients into the stream. These nutrients are/were attached to soil particles and in pore spaces.

  18. Pollution of 1970s • The Federal Pollution Control Act of 1972  NPDES • Clean Water Act (1977) • NEPA (1970) • Clean Air Act (1970) • ESA (1973) • TSCA (1976) • CERCLA (1980)

  19. Governor’s Natural Resources Partnership Agenda “The Secretary of Natural Resources will work with the DEQ, DCR, CBLAD, other agencies and the public to streamline the current storm water management process. A plan and recommendations are due to the Governor by October 1, 2003 that provides for improved water quality protection and evaluates stormwater programs statewide.”

  20. Some of the Key Recommendations • Establish a more uniform statewide construction permitting program • Establish statewide stormwater requirements for projects with land disturbances of 1 acre or greater (with allowance for lower threshold in CBPA) • Empower local governments to implement stormwater management programs • Develop a statewide permit fee system • Encourage low-impact approaches and better site designs • Consolidate SWM and ESC local program reviews

  21. 2004 Legislation • Followed a year of planning meetings/negotiations among Secretary of Natural Resources, three agency heads and key program staff • Accomplished most of Partnership Agenda SWM objectives • Moved nearly all SWM responsibilities from DEQ and CBLAD to DCR, effective July 1, 2004 • DEQ retained responsibility for issuing industrial SWM permits

  22. 2004: Beginning of Stormwater Management in Virginia Since 2004 Stormwater quality and quantity management are mandatory throughout Virginia

  23. Impact of the 2004 Legislation on Clean Water Act Implementation in Virginia

  24. Implementation The Soil and Water Conservation Board passed a motion on July 21, 2005 authorizing the development of a Notice of Intended Regulatory Action (NOIRA). With significant stakeholder involvement, completed regulation revision in two separate regulatory actions • Part 13-Fees, effective February 3, 2010 • Parts 1, 2 and 3-Definitions, Technical Criteria and Local Programs, effective September 13, 2011 Included delayed implementation and grandfathered sections to establish stormwater programs.

  25. Issues encountered during the development of the 2011 Virginia Stormwater Regulations: • Highlighted inconsistencies and contradictions between the CBA, VESCL, VSMA • Difference between localities located in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and those that are not • No good guidance on training and certification

  26. House Bill 1065 (Integration Bill) Amends the Erosion and Sediment Control Law, the Stormwater Management Act and the Chesapeake Bay Act to remove inconsistencies and contradictions between the three laws.

  27. What the Integration Bill does: • Makes the definition section consistent across the three acts • Requires all counties cities and towns that are MS4s in Virginia to adopt a VSMP program • Allows non MS4 towns to adopt a program or be subject to the program of the county where the town is located

  28. What the Integration Bill does: • Requires that you have an approved E&S plan and coverage under VSMP before land disturbance can take place • Establishes a VSMP and VESCP • Eliminates the Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Board and transfers oversight of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act to the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board

  29. What the Integration Bill does not do: • It does not change any of the CBPA requirements (does not eliminate the need to comply with the act) • It does not make the CBPA applicable statewide • It does not change the area (localities) that the original CBPA applies to

  30. What the Integration Bill does not do: • Separate approved E&S plans and the Stormwater Permits are still required before starting land disturbance (more than one approval required) • There are still different permit thresholds for an E&S plan (10,000 and 2,500 sf) and a Stormwater Permit (1 acre)

  31. The SWA (after HB1065) 10.1-603.2 Definitions 10.1-603.2:01 Certified mail; subsequent mail or notices may be sent by regular mail. 10.1-603.2:1 Powers and duties of the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board 10.1-603.2:2 State permits 10.1-603.3 Establishment of Virginia stormwater management programs 10.1-603.4 Development of regulations 10.1-603.4:1 Virginia Stormwater Management Fund established 10.1-603.4:2 Education and training programs. 10.1-603.5 Annual standards and specifications for state agencies, federal entities, and other specified entities 10.1-603.6 Duties of the Department 10.1-603.7 Authorization for more stringent ordinances 10.1-603.8 Regulated activities; submission and approval of a permit application; security for performance; exemptions 10.1-603.8:1 Nutrient credit use and additional off-site options for construction activities 10.1-603.9 Description unavailable 10.1-603.10 (For contingent repeal, see Editor's note) Recovery of administrative costs 10.1-603.11 Monitoring, reports, investigations, inspections, and stop work orders 10.1-603.12 Department to review VSMPs 10.1-603.12:1 Right of entry 10.1-603.12:2 Information to be furnished 10.1-603.12:3 Private rights; liability 10.1-603.12:4 Enforcement by injunction, etc 10.1-603.12:5 Testing validity of regulations; judicial review 10.1-603.12:6 Right to hearing 10.1-603.12:7 Hearings 10.1-603.13 Appeals 10.1-603.13:1 Appeal to Court of Appeals 10.1-603.14 Penalties, injunctions, and other legal actions 10.1-603.14:1 Enforcement authority of MS4 localities 10.1-603.15 `Cooperation with federal and state agencies http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+TOC10010000006000000000000

  32. The SWA (after HB1065) (some important changes to the Act)

  33. The SWA (after HB 1065) In the Definitions (§10.1-603.2) defines: Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act land-disturbing activity as “land-disturbing activity … that result in a land disturbance equal or greater than 2,500 square feet and less than one acre in all areas of jurisdiction designates as subject to the regulations adopted pursuant to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act.”

  34. The SWA (after HB 1065) In the Definitions (§10.1-603.2) defines: Virginia Stormwater Program or VSMP as “a program approved by the Board after September 13, 2011, that has been established by a VSMP authority to manage the quality and quantity of runoff resulting from land-disturbing activities …”

  35. The SWA (after HB 1065) In the Definitions (§10.1-603.2) defines: Virginia Stormwater Program authority or VSMP authority include localities, state entities. Federal entities, and “linear project companies.”

  36. The SWA (after HB 1065) In the Definitions (§10.1-603.2) defines: Watershed … “In karst areas, the karst feature to which water drains may be considered the single outlet for the watershed.”

  37. § 10.1-603.3 Establishment of VSMPs • All Counties, Cities and MS4 Towns must adopt a VSMP by July 1, 2014 Non-MS4 Towns have an option to adopt a VSMP or be subject to the County VSMP

  38. § 10.1-603.4. Development of regulations A. The Board is authorized to adopt regulations that specify minimum technical criteria and administrative procedures for Virginia Stormwater Management Programs. (establishes fees, runoff requirements/reduction, LID, water re-use, innovative methods)

  39. § 10.1-603.4:2. Education and training programs. A. The Board shall issue certificates of competence concerning the content and application of specified subject areas of this article and accompanying regulations, including program administration, plan review, and project inspection, to personnel of VSMP authorities and to any other persons who have completed training programs or in other ways demonstrated adequate knowledge to the satisfaction of the Board. ….

  40. § 10.1-603.5. Annual standards and specifications …. A. State entities, including the Department and the Department of Transportation, and for linear projects set out in subsection B, electric, natural gas, and telephone utility companies, interstate and intrastate natural gas pipeline companies, and railroad companies shall, and federal entities and authorities created pursuant to § 15.2-5102may, annually submit a single set of standards and specifications for Department approval that describes how land-disturbing activities shall be conducted.

  41. § 10.1-603.8. Regulated activities • A person shall not conduct any land-disturbing activity until he has submitted a permit application to the VSMP authority that includes a state VSMP permit registration statement and, after July 1, 2014, a stormwater management plan, and has obtained VSMP authority approval to begin land disturbance. …. VSMP authority has 60 days for review

  42. § 10.1-603.8. Regulated activities (Exemptions) • Mining • Agriculture • Single family residences (< 2,500 sf in CBPA Areas) • Areas < 1 acre, unless in CBPA Area (E&S <10,000 sf) • Sanitary sewer and CSO discharges • Reclamation areas • Routine maintenance • Response to emergencies

  43. § 10.1-603.8:1. Nutrient Credit Use .… Provides and option to use Nutrient Credits in the same tributary to offset impacts from development. (not quantity) Conditions: • Less than 5 acre disturbance • Only for areas that require less than 10 lbs of P reduction per year • Alternatives are considered (i.e., 75% reduction is achieved on site)

  44. § 10.1-603.10. - § 10.1-603.15. • Monitoring • Inspections • Enforcement • Penalties • Hearings • Nutrient credits

  45. The Virginia Stormwater Management Program Regulations

  46. Questions?

More Related